ASUS R9 290X DirectCU II - Watercooling EK FC-R9-290X vs. Aircooling

Published by Hiwa Pouri on 04.03.14
Page:
« 1 2 (3) 4 5 6 ... 16 »

3DMark - Fire Strike



Stock Clocks Points Index
Aircooling ASUS R9 290X DirectCU II (GPU 1050 / Mem 1350MHz) 9'714 100.00 %
Watercooling ASUS R9 290X DirectCU II (GPU 1050 / Mem 1350MHz) 9'789 100.77 %
  More is better


Overclocking Points Index
Aircooling ASUS R9 290X DirectCU II (GPU 1150 / Mem 1500 MHz) 10'301 106.02 %
Watercooling ASUS R9 290X DirectCU II (GPU 1200 / Mem 1500 MHz) 10'843 111.62 %
  More is better


3DMark - Fire Strike Extreme

Stock Clocks Points Index
Aircooling ASUS R9 290X DirectCU II (GPU 1050 / Mem 1350MHz) 5'010 100.00 %
Watercooling ASUS R9 290X DirectCU II (GPU 1050 / Mem 1350MHz) 5'028 100.36 %
  More is better


Overclocking Points Index
Aircooling ASUS R9 290X DirectCU II (GPU 1150 / Mem 1500 MHz) 5'331 106.41 %
Watercooling ASUS R9 290X DirectCU II (GPU 1200 / Mem 1500 MHz) 5'646 112.69 %
  More is better



Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 10 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 11 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 12 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 4 Page 13 - Power Consumption
Page 6 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - Temperatures
Page 7 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Index
Page 8 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Conclusion



  Items by the same author View this article in PDF format Print article

Navigate through the articles
ASUS R9 280X DirectCU II - Watercooling EK FC-R9-280X vs. Aircooling Next article
comments powered by Disqus

ASUS R9 290X DirectCU II - Watercooling EK FC-R9-290X vs. Aircooling - Graphics cards > Aircooling vs. Watercooling - Reviews - ocaholic