PowerColor R9 285 TurboDuo OC Review

Published by Marc Büchel on 29.10.14
Page:
« 1 ... 5 6 7 (8) 9 10 11 ... 20 »



BattleField 4



High Preset, 1920x1080 (1080p) Average FPS %
Gigabyte G1 Gaming GeForce GTX 980 90.81 138.83 %
MSI GTX 980 Gaming 4G 89.87 137.39 %
ASUS Strix OC Edition GeForce GTX 980 88.74 135.67 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 980 86.86 132.79 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti 81.38 124.42 %
ASUS Radeon R9 290X Matrix Platinum 73.40 112.22 %
AMD Radeon R9 290X 71.74 109.68 %
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN 71.03 108.59 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 970 67.59 103.33 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 65.41 100.00 %
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC 62.98 96.28 %
AMD Radeon R9 290 60.23 92.08 %
AMD Radeon R9 280X 52.74 80.63 %
PowerColor Radeon R9 285 TurboDuo 49.53 75.75 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 48.55 74.22 %
More is better


High Preset, 2560x1440 (1440p) Average FPS %
MSI GTX 980 Gaming 4G 59.88 141.43 %
Gigabyte G1 Gaming GeForce GTX 980 59.62 140.81 %
ASUS Strix OC Edition GeForce GTX 980 57.55 135.92 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 980 56.69 133.89 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti 53.85 127.18 %
ASUS Radeon R9 290X Matrix Platinum 48.22 113.89 %
AMD Radeon R9 290X 47.12 111.29 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 970 46.80 110.53 %
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN 45.24 106.85 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 42.34 100.00 %
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC 42.06 99.34 %
AMD Radeon R9 290 39.63 93.60 %
AMD Radeon R9 280X 33.73 79.66 %
PowerColor Radeon R9 285 TurboDuo 28.59 67.52 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 27.22 64.29 %
More is better


High Preset, 3840x2160 (2160p) Average FPS %
Gigabyte G1 Gaming GeForce GTX 980 33.19 158.27 %
MSI GTX 980 Gaming 4G 32.68 155.84 %
ASUS Strix OC Edition GeForce GTX 980 31.88 152.03 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 980 30.44 145.16 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti 26.51 126.42 %
ASUS Radeon R9 290X Matrix Platinum 25.05 119.46 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 970 25.03 119.36 %
AMD Radeon R9 290X 24.75 118.03 %
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC 23.92 114.07 %
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN 23.86 113.78 %
AMD Radeon R9 290 23.81 113.54 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 20.97 100.00 %
AMD Radeon R9 280X 16.90 80.59 %
PowerColor Radeon R9 285 TurboDuo 13.85 68.05 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 9.88 47.11 %
More is better


Battlefield 4 Settings

1080p 1440p 2160p
  • Graphics Quality: Custom
  • Texture Quality: Ultra
  • Texture Filtering: Ultra
  • Lighting Quality: Ultra
  • FX Quality: Ultra
  • Post Process Quality: Ultra
  • Mesh Quality: Ultra
  • Terrain Quality: Ultra
  • Terrain Decoration: Ultra
  • Antialiasing Deferred: 4x MSAA
  • Antialiasing Post: High
  • Ambient Occlusion: HBAO
  • Graphics Quality: Custom
  • Texture Quality: Ultra
  • Texture Filtering: Ultra
  • Lighting Quality: Ultra
  • FX Quality: Ultra
  • Post Process Quality: Ultra
  • Mesh Quality: Ultra
  • Terrain Quality: Ultra
  • Terrain Decoration: Ultra
  • Antialiasing Deferred: 4x MSAA
  • Antialiasing Post: High
  • Ambient Occlusion: HBAO
  • Graphics Quality: Custom
  • Texture Quality: Ultra
  • Texture Filtering: Ultra
  • Lighting Quality: Ultra
  • FX Quality: Ultra
  • Post Process Quality: Ultra
  • Mesh Quality: Ultra
  • Terrain Quality: Ultra
  • Terrain Decoration: Ultra
  • Antialiasing Deferred: 4x MSAA
  • Antialiasing Post: High
  • Ambient Occlusion: HBAO


Page 1 - Presentation / Specifications Page 11 - Sniper Elite 3
Page 2 - The card Page 12 - Crysis 3
Page 3 - Photo Gallery / Delivery Page 13 - Thief
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 14 - GRID Autosport
Page 5 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 15 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 6 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 16 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Borderlands - The Pre-Sequel Page 17 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - BattleField 4 Page 18 - Performance/Price & Performance/Watt
Page 9 - Watch Dogs Page 19 - Prices
Page 10 - Tomb Raider Page 20 - Conclusion




Navigate through the articles
Previous article Sapphire Dual-X R9 280 OC Edition Review PowerColor Radeon PCS+ R9 390X 8GB Review Next article
comments powered by Disqus

PowerColor R9 285 TurboDuo OC Review - Graphics cards > Reviews > AMD - Reviews - ocaholic