Gigabyte EX58-UD3R

Published by Michel90 on 01.12.10
Page:
« 1 ... 8 9 10 (11) 12 13 »

Games

Crysis 800 x 600, low details

Crysis is still one of the games which has very high system requirements. Therefore developer Crytek implemented Direct3D-10-API, High-Dynamic-Range-Rendering, Parallax Occlusion Mapping, Soft Shadows, Motion Blur, Depth of Field as well as Soft Particles. We test Crysis by using DirectX9 as well as DirectX10 to show CPU-sacaling especially which low resolutions. If we look at the high resolutions we are able to spot that the CPUs influence compared to the graphic card becomes much less important.

Crysis DirectX9 (800 x 600 low details)   Percent
Asus P6T6 WS Revolution 68.82 fps 100.00 %
Asus Rampage III Extreme 68.61 fps 99.69 %
Gigabyte X58A-UD7 67.09 fps 97.49 %
Gigabyte EX58-UD3R 65.56 fps 95.26 %
  more is better


Resident Evil 800 x 600, low details

Resident Evil uses nearly every modern rendering technology: HDR, Hemisphere Lighting, Soft Shadows, Soft Particles, Field- und Motion-Blur oder auch Alpha to Coverage and static Ambient Occlusion. Furthermore Resident Evil 5 has been optimized for multicore architectures and already comes DirectX11 ready. By using the DirectX9 as well as the DirectX10 benchmark we can again show you CPU-scaling with low resolutions and the compared to the CPU overproportional influence of the graphics card at high resolutions.

Resident Evil DirectX9 (800 x 600 low details)   Percent
Asus P6T6 WS Revolution 165.20 fps 100.00 %
Gigabyte X58A-UD7 163.40 fps 98.91 %
Asus Rampage III Extreme 162.70 fps 98.49 %
Gigabyte EX58-UD3R 161.80 fps 97.94 %
  more is better


Street Fighter 4 800 x 600, low details

Street Fighter 4 comes with an extra benchmark version which makes testing you system childrens play. At low resolutions the system requirements are pretty low and we can see CPU-scaling in the results. At high resolution the graphic card becomes more important and the CPUs clock speed has less influence on the fps.

Street Fighter 4 (800 x 600 low details)   Percent
Gigabyte EX58-UD3R 645.40 fps 100.25 %
Asus P6T6 WS Revolution 643.76 fps 100.00 %
Gigabyte X58A-UD7 643.60 fps 99.98 %
Asus Rampage III Extreme 642.42 fps 99.79 %
  more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 9 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Layout Page 10 - Super Pi / wPrime
Page 4 - Connectors and I/O Page 11 - Games
Page 5 - BIOS Page 12 - Overclocking
Page 6 - Test setup Page 13 - Conclusion
Page 7 - Futuremark  



Discuss this article in the forums




Navigate through the articles
Previous article Gigabyte GA-EX58A-UD9 MSI Big Bang XPower X58 Next article
comments powered by Disqus

Gigabyte EX58-UD3R - Motherboards > Intel > X58 - Reviews - ocaholic