Asus M5A99X Evo

Published by Christian Ney on 04.07.11
Page:
« 1 ... 4 5 6 (7) 8 9 10 ... 14 »

SiSoft Sandra 1

SiSoft Sandra is a theoretical multi purpose benchmark suite which is able to show differences in CPU architectures. We split the tests with SiSoft Sandra into two parts. Therefore on this page you'll find Arithmetic-, Multimedia- and Cryptography-benchmarks.

Arithmetic Benchmark

Dhrystone GIPS Percent
ASUS M4A78-HTPC (DDR2-800-CL4) 76.17 100.00 %
ASUS M5A99X Evo 75.15 98.56 %
ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme 74.56 97.88 %
ECS A890GXM-A2 74.49 97.79 %
ASRock M3A790GXH/128M 74.08 97.25 %
ASUS M4A78T-E 72.47 95.14 %
DFI LanParty DK 790FXB-M3H5 70.58 92.66 %
Gigabyte MA790FXT-UD5P 63.00 82.71 %
  Higher is better


Whetstone GFLOPS Percent
ASUS M5A99X Evo 56.00 100.38 %
Gigabyte MA790FXT-UD5P 56.00 100.38 %
ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme 55.86 100.12 %
ASUS M4A78-HTPC (DDR2-800-CL4) 55.79 100.00 %
ASUS M4A78T-E 55.76 99.94 %
ECS A890GXM-A2 55.56 99.59 %
ASRock M3A790GXH/128M 55.50 99.48 %
DFI LanParty DK 790FXB-M3H5 55.35 99.57 %
  Higher is better


Multimedia

Integer MPixels/sec Percent
ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme 83.39 100.23 %
ASUS M5A99X Evo 83.36 100.19 %
Gigabyte MA790FXT-UD5P 83.33 100.15 %
ASUS M4A78T-E 83.30 100.12 %
DFI LanParty DK 790FXB-M3H5 83.20 100.00 %
ASUS M4A78-HTPC (DDR2-800-CL4) 83.20 100.00 %
ASRock M3A790GXH/128M 83.00 99.76 %
ECS A890GXM-A2 82.86 99.59 %
  Higher is better


floating point MPixels/sec Percent
ASUS M5A99X Evo 136.00 100.32 %
ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme 135.86 100.22 %
Gigabyte MA790FXT-UD5P 135.80 100.18 %
ASUS M4A78T-E 135.70 100.10 %
ASUS M4A78-HTPC (DDR2-800-CL4) 135.56 100.00 %
ECS A890GXM-A2 135.38 99.87 %
ASRock M3A790GXH/128M 135.35 99.84 %
DFI LanParty DK 790FXB-M3H5 135.34 99.84 %
  Higher is better


Crytography

AES 256 MByte/s Percent
ASUS M5A99X Evo 980 101.03 %
ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme 977 100.72 %
Gigabyte MA790FXT-UD5P 976 100.62 %
ASUS M4A78T-E 976 100.62 %
DFI LanParty DK 790FXB-M3H5 974 100.41 %
ASRock M3A790GXH/128M 971 100.10 %
ECS A890GXM-A2 971 100.10 %
ASUS M4A78-HTPC (DDR2-800-CL4) 970 100.00 %
  Higher is better


SHA 256 MByte/s Percent
ASUS M5A99X Evo 883 101.38 %
ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme 881 101.15 %
Gigabyte MA790FXT-UD5P 880 101.03 %
DFI LanParty DK 790FXB-M3H5 879 100.92 %
ASUS M4A78T-E 878 100.80 %
ASRock M3A790GXH/128M 878 100.80 %
ECS A890GXM-A2 878 100.80 %
ASUS M4A78-HTPC (DDR2-800-CL4) 871 100.00 %
  Higher is better


Page 1 - ASUS M5A99X Evo Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 2 - Specifications Page 9 - SuperPi/WPrime
Page 3 - Presentaion/Layout/I/O/Bundle Page 10 - Games
Page 4 - BIOS Page 11 - Asus AI Suite II / TurboV Evo Overclocking
Page 5 - Test Setup Page 12 - Temperatures
Page 6 - FutureMark Page 13 - Overclocking
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 14 - Conclusion  



Discuss this article in the forums




Navigate through the articles
Layout and Design: ASUS Sabertooth 990FX Next article
comments powered by Disqus

Asus M5A99X Evo - Motherboards > AMD > 990 - Reviews - ocaholic