Article in English | Artikel in Deutsch | Article en français | Articolo in italiano |
Gigabyte 780 GHz | ASUS 780 Poseidon P | Gigabyte 780 OC V2 | GeForce GTX 780 | |
Chip | GK110-300-B1 | GK110-300-B1 | GK110-300-A1 | GK110-300-A1 |
Process | 28 nm | 28 nm | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Transistors | 7.10 billion | 7.10 billion | 7.10 billion | 7.10 billion |
GPU clock | 1'020 MHz | 954 MHz | 954 MHz | 863 MHz |
GPU Boost clock | 1'072 MHz | 1'006 MHz | 1'006 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory GDDR5 | 3'072 MB | 3'072 MB | 3'072 MB | 3'072 MB |
Memory clock | 1'502 (6'008) MHz | 1'502 (6'008) MHz | 1'502 (6'008) MHz | 1'502 (6'008) MHz |
Memory interface | 384 Bit | 384 Bit | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory bandwidth | 288'400 MB/s | 288'400 MB/s | 288'400 MB/s | 288'400 MB/s |
Shader Cores | 2'304 (12 SMX) | 2'304 (12 SMX) | 2'304 (12 SMX) | 2'304 (12 SMX) |
TMUs | 192 | 192 | 192 | 192 |
ROPs | 48 | 48 | 48 | 48 |
TDP | xxx Watt | xxx Watt | >250 Watt | 250 Watt |
PCB Type | Custom Design | Custom Design | Custom Design | Reference Design |
Lenght (PCB - Total) | 26.9 - 28.8 cm | 26.9 - 28.1 cm | 26.9 - 28.8 cm | 27.0 - 27.0 cm |
Height (PCB - Total) | 11.0 - 12.9 cm | 12.0 - 13.6 cm | 11.0 - 12.9 cm | 11.0 - 11.0 cm |
Slots | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Cooler | WindForce 3X 450W | DirectCU H2O | WindForce 3X 450W | NVIDIA Reference |
Launch Price | $XXX | $XXX | $XXX | $649 |
Graphics Cards | Performance Index | Power C. (Watts)* | Performance/Watt*10 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti (ASUS DC2T) | 53.55 | 178 | 3.01 |
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN (Ref) | 85.05 | 306 | 2.78 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 770 (ASUS DC2OC) | 70.92 | 257 | 2.76 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 670 (ASUS DC2T) | 62.00 | 227 | 2.73 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti (GBT GHz) | 90.53 | 333 | 2.72 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 (ASUS DC2OC) | 81.66 | 302 | 2.70 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 (ASUS DC2T) | 47.37 | 177 | 2.68 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 (Ref) | 68.36 | 258 | 2.65 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 760 (ASUS DC2OC) | 56.63 | 218 | 2.60 |
AMD Radeon R9 270 (ASUS DC2OC) | 49.98 | 194 | 2.58 |
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum | 89.96 | 350 | 2.57 |
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 OC V2 | 89.69 | 360 | 2.49 |
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 GHz Edition | 92.84 | 374 | 2.48 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost (Ref) | 40.87 | 169 | 2.42 |
AMD Radeon R9 270X (ASUS DC2T) | 53.39 | 223 | 2.39 |
AMD Radeon HD 7870 (ASUS DC2T V2) | 50.03 | 220 | 2.27 |
AMD Radeon HD 7850 (ASUS DC2T) | 42.04 | 195 | 2.16 |
AMD Radeon HD 7790 (ASUS DC2OC - Ref PCB) | 32.75 | 152 | 2.15 |
AMD Radeon R9 280X (ASUS DC2T) | 68.40 | 320 | 2.14 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti (ASUS DC2T) | 30.8 | 151 | 2.04 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 580 (Ref) | 50.49 | 254 | 1.99 |
AMD Radeon HD 7970 (XFX DD - Ref PCB) | 63.41 | 323 | 1.96 |
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition (ASUS Matrix P.) | 69.99 | 360 | 1.94 |
AMD Radeon HD 6950 (Ref) | 36.83 | 208 | 1.77 |
AMD Radeon HD 6970 (Ref) | 41.32 | 244 | 1.69 |
AMD Radeon HD 6870 (Ref) | 31.88 | 200 | 1.59 |
AMD Radeon HD 5850 (Ref) | 30.05 | 193 | 1.56 |
AMD Radeon HD 5870 (Ref) | 35.98 | 232 | 1.55 |
AMD Radeon HD 6990 (Ref) | 73.96 | 481 | 1.54 |
*Entire system | More is better | Less is better | More is better |
Graphics Cards | Performance Index | Price (€)* | Performance/€*10 |
AMD Radeon HD 7790 | 32.75 | 91 | 3.60 |
AMD Radeon HD 7870 | 50.03 | 143 | 3.50 |
AMD Radeon R9 270 | 49.98 | 144 | 3.47 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | 40.87 | 121 | 3.38 |
AMD Radeon R9 270X | 53.39 | 159 | 3.36 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 | 47.37 | 144 | 3.29 |
AMD Radeon HD 7850 | 40.04 | 124 | 3.23 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti | 30.80 | 100 | 3.08 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 53.55 | 193 | 2.77 |
AMD Radeon HD 7970 | 63.41 | 232 | 2.73 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 670 | 62.00 | 228 | 2.72 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 760 | 56.63 | 199 | 2.85 |
AMD Radeon R9 280X | 68.40 | 241 | 2.84 |
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition | 69.99 | 260 | 2.69 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 770 | 70.92 | 266 | 2.67 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 580 | 50.49 | 190 | 2.66 |
AMD Radeon HD 6870 | 31.88 | 126 | 2.53 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 | 68.36 | 291 | 2.35 |
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 OC V2 | 89.69 | 429 | 2.09 |
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 GHz Edition | 92.84 | 456 | 2.04 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 | 81.66 | 415 | 1.97 |
AMD Radeon HD 6950 | 36.83 | 205 | 1.80 |
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum | 89.96 | 552 | 1.63 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 90.53 | 582 | 1.56 |
AMD Radeon HD 6970 | 41.32 | 310 | 1.33 |
AMD Radeon HD 5850 | 30.05 | 260 | 1.16 |
AMD Radeon HD 5870 | 35.98 | 335 | 1.07 |
AMD Radeon HD 6990 | 73.96 | 708 | 1.04 |
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN | 85.05 | 832 | 1.02 |
* 06/01/2014 | More is better | Less is better | More is better |
General | + | - | |
With the GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum, ASUS
comes with a very interesting and unique product. We really like the
idea of hybrid cooling introduced with the DirectCU H2O that allows
users to choose how they want to chill their card. It also allows
watercooling the card out of the box without voiding the warranty. 3D
performance as well as cooling performance are good and we also like the fact that
the card is equiped with a full backplate. As always we would have liked to see the memory factory overclocked and the overclocking on the core pushed further. Further improvements could have been made to noise levels, idle power consumption and to the cooler. Something else we noticed concerns the delivery as we were quite surprised not to find a SLI bridge. We would also have liked the manufacturer to include some barbs. |
- Performance
- Cooling performance - Design - Hybrid cooler - Backplate |
- Memory Clock
- Noise levels - Price - Bundle - Face-plate |
|
Cooling / Noise Level | + | - | |
In terms of raw cooling performance, the DirectCU
H2O offers good air cooling performance. Especially when you consider
the design of this cooler compared to a DirectCU II for example, then
the air cooling performance is very good. The noise levels are correct but not as low as we would like them to be. In idle the card is inaudible and under load we consider the card silent but audible (38.3 dBA). More heatpipes above the core would have maybe helped increase cooling efficiency and reduce noise levels. We are going to test the water cooling performance in an upcoming article. |
- Cooling performance | - Noise levels | |
Performance | + | - | |
Overall the 3D performance is good but as said
previously, performance could have easily been improved with higher
factory clocks. Especially when you concider this card is based on the
new, more efficient, revision of the GK110 chip and it will most likely
be watercooled. ASUS could have - for example - added a BIOS switch on
its card with one BIOS featuring much higher clocks. A closer look at power consumption reveals that the Poseidon Platinum draws a bit more in idle than the two Gigabyte cards with 7 Watts difference on the wall and is more efficient under load with a better performance/watt ratio. |
- Performance
- Power consumption under load |
- idle power consumption
- Performance/Price |
|
Recommendation / Price | + | - | |
The ASUS ROG GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum is a premium product so it comes with a price, we are talking about 550 Euros. That's right, that is 110 Euros more than the DirectCU II version and 100 Euros more than Gigabyte's GHz Edition. On one side we think 110 Euros is quite a lot for a higher factory overclock, a vapor chamber with water channel and a cutdown air cooler. On the other side 550 Euros is roughtly the price of a GTX 780 + full waterblock and the ASUS card has the advantage of being hybrid, maybe better cooled overall and you don't have to worry about warranty. |
- Gaming
- Modding - WC |
- Price | |
We gave the GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum from ASUS 4 out of 5 stars. | |||