ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC Review
Category : AMD
Published by Hiwa Pouri on 03.04.14
There are quite a few custom Radeon R9 290 graphics cards available meanwhile and today we are going to have a look at the ASUS one, the Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC. The Radeon R9 290 version is no different from other high-end DirectCU II cards from the manufacturer, you don't change a formula that works. The R9 290 DirectCU II OC features a custom PCB with a beefed up power design and is chilled by the latest version of the DirectCU II cooler. Other than the obvious the card has a factory overclocking on both the core and memory as well as a BIOS DIP switch allowing users to choose between a silent or a performance operation.



  Article in English   Artikel in Deutsch   Article en français   Articolo in italiano


Presentation




The new ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC graphics card features a custom PCB design, which received a beefed up power design, the quite famous DirectCU II cooler as well as a decent factory overclock. At a first glance it looks like the new R9 290 DirectCU II OC shares the same cooler as the R9 290X and the GTX 780 Ti DirectCU II series while the PCB is similar to the one on the R9 290X DirectCU II series, which are definitely good starting points.



Since this is the DirectCU II OC version of the ASUS Radeon R9 290 series, the graphics card comes with a decent factory overclock. While the reference AMD Radeon R9 290 GPU is set to work at up to 947 MHz, the ASUS DirectCU II OC one works at 1'000 MHz. ASUS also decided to overclock the GDDR5 memory on its card from 1'000 MHz (4'000 MHz effective) to 1'260 MHz (5'040 MHz effective).

During our testing the ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC held 1'000 MHz most of the time while being under load. We have only experienced downclocking when running FurMark, where the GPU clock was going down to to 920 MHz with the temperature increase. We did not notice any throttling while gaming which is a very good point for the custom ASUS card compared to the reference cards which were throttling most of the time.




Specifications


ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC Radeon R9 290X Radeon R9 280X
Chip Hawaii Pro Hawaii XT Tahiti XT2/L
Process 28 nm 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors 6.20 billion 6.20 billion 4.31 billion
GPU clock 1'000 MHz up to 1'000 MHz 1'000 MHz
Memory GDDR5 4'096 MB 4'096 MB 3'072 MB
Memory clock 1'260 (5'400) MHz 1'250 (5'000) MHz 1'500 (6'000) MHz
Memory interface 512 Bit 512 Bit 384 Bit
Memory bandwidth 322.6 GB/s 320.0 GB/s 288 GB/s
Shader Cores 2'560 2'816 2'048
TMUs 160 176 128
ROPs 64 64 32
PCB Type Custom Design Reference Design Reference Design
Slots 2 2 2
Cooler DirectCU II AMD Reference AMD Reference




Page 1 - Presentation / Specifications Page 11 - DIRT Showdown
Page 2 - The card Page 12 - Far Cry 3
Page 3 - Photo Gallery / Delivery Page 13 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 14 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 5 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 15 - Metro: Last Light
Page 6 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 16 - GTA V
Page 7 - BattleField 3 Page 17 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - Bioshock Infinite Page 18 - Temperatures / Noise levels
Page 9 - Crysis 3 Page 19 - Performance/Price & Performance/Watt
Page 10 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 20 - Conclusion
[pagebreak]

The card


 


ASUS decided to equip the Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC with the latest revision of their famous DirectCU II cooler. It is exactly the same cooler ASUS puts on the GeForce GTX 780 and the 780 Ti DirectCU II series, and no changes have been made. In this case you get no less than five heatpipes, two of which are six millimeter, two eight millimeter and one with a massive ten millimeter diameter. The heatpipes have been nickel plated and are in direct contact with the GPU core. Soldered to the heatpipes you will find the fin stack which is being provided with fresh air via two 95mm fans. The fan closer to the I/O shield is a hybrid axial/radial fan which ASUS likes to call "CoolTech". They claim that this fan is able to provide a higher airflow than standard axial or radial fans at the same noise level. In case of the second fan you find a standard axial fan. Both fans are being manufactured by Everflow and strangely share the same model name, T129215SU.
Overall the cooler is well made and the finish is on a very reasonable level too. Good thermal paste has been spread all over the core in large quantity but the memory chips did not get active cooling.

Like the reference model, the ASUS DirectCU II OC has a DIP switch to select between two BIOS options. Unfortunately, the switch positions are not labeled. The SW1 position is silent mode and the SW2 is the performance mode. There is also no note in the bundled documentation or on the website product page. Unlike the reference model, ASUS chose to equip this graphics card with a silent mode BIOS and a performance mode BIOS, rather than a normal/uber mode BIOS options. In our opinion ASUS made the right choice. We have tested both modes and surprisingly we did not experience any performance loss while using the silent BIOS. The only difference we noticed were regarding the temperatures and fan speeds. In case of the silent BIOS, the fan was always around lowest speed between 20-25% and in this case the GPU temperature was around 90°C. These temperature readings are nothing to be worried about as the R9 Series chip can take it. With the performance BIOS, the card was trying to keep the GPU temperature between 73 and 77°C (fan speed range: 40-50%).

 
This card allowed for a maximum stable overclock to 1100 MHz on the GPU side and 1375 MHz on the memory side. We used Furemark V1.11.0 Geeks3D benchmark with 15 minutes duration in order to test the stability. With these clocks we had to feed the GPU with 1.15 Volt and the memory ran at stock voltages.

 


Like most of ASUS' recent high-end cards, the PCB on the ASUS R9 290 DirectCU II OC has been completely reworked and the power design has been beefed-up. A closer look at it shows an 8-phase power implementation for the main power design where the GPU gets six (there are five on the reference card) and the memory gets remaining two phases. The PCB design looks a lot like the one you get with the R9 290X DirectCU II model.

The main power design MOSFETs are being actively cooled via a black aluminum heatsink/thermal pad combo. The manufacturer decided to equip its Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II with both metal reinforcement (located at the top end of the card) and full backplate to prevent bending and protect the card at the same time.
Component wise ASUS uses a high quality design, so called Super Alloy Power, components. Last but not least, located at the rear of the PCB there are several voltage and modification points (VDDCI, MVDD, VDDC, OVCI, OVM, OVC) as well as the ROG Connect soldering points.

Checking the voltage regulation chip we find a digital multi-phase controller labelled Digi+ ASP1300 for the GPU, and one uP1631P from uPI Semiconductor for the memory.

 


The memory chips used are made by Elpida and carry the model number W2032BBBG-6A-F. They are specified to run at 1'260 MHz (5'040 MHz effective).





Page 1 - Presentation / Specifications Page 11 - DIRT Showdown
Page 2 - The card Page 12 - Far Cry 3
Page 3 - Photo Gallery / Delivery Page 13 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 14 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 5 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 15 - Metro: Last Light
Page 6 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 16 - GTA V
Page 7 - BattleField 3 Page 17 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - Bioshock Infinite Page 18 - Temperatures / Noise levels
Page 9 - Crysis 3 Page 19 - Performance/Price & Performance/Watt
Page 10 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 20 - Conclusion
[pagebreak]

Photo Gallery



   

   

   

   


Delivery

    


The card ships well bolstered in a foam made mold. Bundled with the graphics card are the user guide, the driver CD, two power converters (2x6-Pin-PCIe to 1x8-Pin-PCIe) as well as a case badge. We would have loved to find a few additional goodies in the box but the bundle is not that bad either.



Page 1 - Presentation / Specifications Page 11 - DIRT Showdown
Page 2 - The card Page 12 - Far Cry 3
Page 3 - Photo Gallery / Delivery Page 13 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 14 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 5 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 15 - Metro: Last Light
Page 6 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 16 - GTA V
Page 7 - BattleField 3 Page 17 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - Bioshock Infinite Page 18 - Temperatures / Noise levels
Page 9 - Crysis 3 Page 19 - Performance/Price & Performance/Watt
Page 10 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 20 - Conclusion
[pagebreak]

Test Setup


Motherboard
  • ASUS Maximus V Formula (BIOS 1707)
CPU
  • Intel Core i7-3770K @ 4.0 GHz (Turbo On / HT On)
Memory
  • G.Skill Ares Dual Channel 2x8GB @ CL11-13-13-31-1T-Auto DDR3-2400 MHz
Graphics Cards
  • ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti Matrix Platinum
  • ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum
  • ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC
  • ASUS Radeon R9 290X Matrix Platinum
  • Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 Ti GHz
  • MSI GTX 760 Gaming MINI-ITX
  • MSI Twin Frozr Gaming GTX 780 OC Edition
  • MSI Twin Frozr Gaming R9 280X OC Edition
  • PowerColor LCS R9 290X
  • PowerColor LCS R9 290X OC 1200MHz / 1500MHz
  • nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti
  • nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN
  • nVidia GeForce GTX 780
  • nVidia GeForce GTX 770
  • nVidia GeForce GTX 760
  • nVidia GeForce GTX 680
  • nVidia GeForce GTX 670
  • nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti
  • nVidia GeForce GTX 660
  • nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
  • nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti
  • nVidia GeForce GTX 580
  • AMD Radeon R9 280X (1'000/1'500)
  • AMD Radeon R9 270X (1'050/1'400)
  • AMD Radeon R9 270 (925/1'400)
  • AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition
  • AMD Radeon HD 7970
  • AMD Radeon HD 7870
  • AMD Radeon HD 7850
  • AMD Radeon HD 7790 (1'000/1'500)
  • AMD Radeon HD 6990
  • AMD Radeon HD 6970
  • AMD Radeon HD 6950
  • AMD Radeon HD 6870
  • AMD Radeon HD 5870
  • AMD Radeon HD 5850
Drivers
  • Windows 7 x64 (up to date)
  • NVIDIA ForceWare 331.40 Beta
  • AMD Catalyst 13.11 BetaV1
  • Intel Chipset Driver 9.4.0.1026
Games and OS
  • Windows 7 x64 (Up to date on the 01/10/2013)
  • All games were up to date on the 01/10/2013
System Drive
  • OCZ Technology Octane 512 GB SSD
PSU
  • Seasonic Platinum SS-1000XP / 1000 Watts



Page 1 - Presentation / Specifications Page 11 - DIRT Showdown
Page 2 - The card Page 12 - Far Cry 3
Page 3 - Photo Gallery / Delivery Page 13 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 14 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 5 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 15 - Metro: Last Light
Page 6 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 16 - GTA V
Page 7 - BattleField 3 Page 17 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - Bioshock Infinite Page 18 - Temperatures / Noise levels
Page 9 - Crysis 3 Page 19 - Performance/Price & Performance/Watt
Page 10 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 20 - Conclusion
[pagebreak]

3DMark - Fire Strike Performance





Graphics Cards Score Graphics Score
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 Ti GHz 11'024 13'020
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti Matrix Platinum 10'455 12'225
ASUS Radeon R9 290X Matrix Platinum 9'690 11'452
PowerColor LCS R9 290X  9'400 10'988
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum 9'115 10'399
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC 9'043 10'566
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti 8'970 10'185
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming GTX 780 OC Edition 8'639 10'883
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN 8'396 9'420
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 7'877 8'734
MSI Gaming R9 280X OC Edition 7'294 8'146
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition 7'091 7'922
AMD Radeon R9 280X 7'093 7'837
nVidia GeForce GTX 770 6'679 7'408
AMD Radeon HD 7970 6'578 7'215
AMD Radeon HD 6990 6'350 7'207
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 6'402 7'102
MSI GTX 760 Gaming MINI-ITX 5'801 6'338
nVidia GeForce GTX 670 5'624 6'099
AMD Radeon R9 270X 5'318 5'784
nVidia GeForce GTX 760 5'243 5'645
AMD Radeon R9 270 5'059 5'483
AMD Radeon HD 7870 5'009 5'436
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti 4'885 5'270
nVidia GeForce GTX 580 4'545 4'975
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 4'415 4'707
AMD Radeon HD 7850 4'176 4'460
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 3'762 3'962
AMD Radeon HD 6970 3'742 3'880
AMD Radeon HD 7790 3'546 3'823
AMD Radeon HD 6950 3'338 3'446
AMD Radeon HD 5870 3'232 3'299
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti 3'031 3'182
AMD Radeon HD 6870 2'991 3'096
AMD Radeon HD 5850 2'710 2'751
More is better





3DMark - Fire Strike Extreme





Graphics Cards Score Graphics Score
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 Ti GHz 5'668 6'028
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti Matrix Platinum 5'340 5'641
ASUS Radeon R9 290X Matrix Platinum 5'011 5'336
PowerColor LCS R9 290X  4'823 5'101
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum 4'658 4'854
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC 4'619 4'884
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti 4'550 4'747
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming GTX 780 OC Edition 4'406 4'562
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN 4'271 4'420
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 4'007 4'121
MSI Gaming R9 280X OC Edition 3'634 3'757
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition 3'568 3'720
AMD Radeon R9 280X 3'564 3'668
nVidia GeForce GTX 770 3'319 3'448
AMD Radeon HD 6990 3'185 3'274
AMD Radeon HD 7970 3'291 3'383
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 3'176 3'286
MSI GTX 760 Gaming MINI-ITX 2'904 2'970
nVidia GeForce GTX 670 2'805 2'872
AMD Radeon R9 270X 2'657 2'739
nVidia GeForce GTX 760 2'610 2'655
AMD Radeon R9 270 2'503 2'562
AMD Radeon HD 7870 2'484 2'560
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti 2'378 2'440
nVidia GeForce GTX 580 2'213 2'350
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 2'178 2'202
AMD Radeon HD 7850 2'044 2'073
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 1'842 1'848
AMD Radeon HD 6970 1'784 1'760
AMD Radeon HD 6950 1'585 1'555
AMD Radeon HD 7790 1'456 1'437
AMD Radeon HD 6870 1'101 1'025
AMD Radeon HD 5870 1'005 1'005
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti 942 983
AMD Radeon HD 5850 959 878
More is better





Page 1 - Presentation / Specifications Page 11 - DIRT Showdown
Page 2 - The card Page 12 - Far Cry 3
Page 3 - Photo Gallery / Delivery Page 13 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 14 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 5 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 15 - Metro: Last Light
Page 6 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 16 - GTA V
Page 7 - BattleField 3 Page 17 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - Bioshock Infinite Page 18 - Temperatures / Noise levels
Page 9 - Crysis 3 Page 19 - Performance/Price & Performance/Watt
Page 10 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 20 - Conclusion
[pagebreak]

Unigine Heaven 4.0 Extreme Preset





Graphics Cards Score fps
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 Ti GHz 2'181 86.6
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti Matrix Platinum 2'040 81.0
ASUS Radeon R9 290X Matrix Platinum 2'046 81.2
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum 1'805 71.6
PowerColor LCS R9 290X  1'754 68.9
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti 1'744 69.2
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC 1'645 65.1
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming GTX 780 OC Edition 1'603 63.6
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN 1'594 63.3
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 1'537 61.0
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 1'261 50.0
nVidia GeForce GTX 770 1'204 47.8
AMD Radeon HD 6990 1'156 45.9
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition 1'137 45.1
MSI Gaming R9 280X OC Edition 1'135 45.0
AMD Radeon R9 280X 1'113 44.2
AMD Radeon HD 7970 1'034 41.1
nVidia GeForce GTX 670 1'028 40.8
MSI GTX 760 Gaming MINI-ITX 1'004 39.9
nVidia GeForce GTX 760 951 37.8
nVidia GeForce GTX 580 915 36.3
AMD Radeon R9 270X 886 35.2
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti 866 34.4
AMD Radeon R9 270 832 33.0
AMD Radeon HD 7870 826 32.8
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 801 31.8
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 705 28.0
AMD Radeon HD 7850 684 27.2
AMD Radeon HD 6970 620 24.6
AMD Radeon HD 7790 568 22.5
AMD Radeon HD 6950 556 22.1
AMD Radeon HD 6870 510 20.3
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti 498 19.8
AMD Radeon HD 5870 478 19.0
AMD Radeon HD 5850 403 16.0
More is better





Page 1 - Presentation / Specifications Page 11 - DIRT Showdown
Page 2 - The card Page 12 - Far Cry 3
Page 3 - Photo Gallery / Delivery Page 13 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 14 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 5 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 15 - Metro: Last Light
Page 6 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 16 - GTA V
Page 7 - BattleField 3 Page 17 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - Bioshock Infinite Page 18 - Temperatures / Noise levels
Page 9 - Crysis 3 Page 19 - Performance/Price & Performance/Watt
Page 10 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 20 - Conclusion
[pagebreak]

BattleField 3





High Preset, 1920x1080, 4xMSAA, Ultra, SSAO Average FPS
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 Ti GHz 120.4
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti Matrix Platinum 118.9
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti 101.0
ASUS Radeon R9 290X Matrix Platinum 100.9
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum 99.4
PowerColor LCS R9 290X 99.0
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN 96.4
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming GTX 780 OC Edition 94.0
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC 92.9
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 90.4
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition 78.4
MSI Gaming R9 280X OC Edition 77.0
AMD Radeon R9 280X 76.6
nVidia GeForce GTX 770 76.6
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 72.8
AMD Radeon HD 7970 71.2
MSI GTX 760 Gaming MINI-ITX 67.0
nVidia GeForce GTX 670 66.0
AMD Radeon HD 6990 65.6
nVidia GeForce GTX 760 62.0
AMD Radeon R9 270X 58.2
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti 55.8
AMD Radeon R9 270 55.0
AMD Radeon HD 7870 54.2
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 50.6
nVidia GeForce GTX 580 48.6
AMD Radeon HD 7850 44.6
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 44.2
AMD Radeon HD 7790 36.6
AMD Radeon HD 6970 35.8
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti 33.2
AMD Radeon HD 5870 32.6
AMD Radeon HD 6950 32.0
AMD Radeon HD 6870 29.8
AMD Radeon HD 5850 26.6
More is better






Page 1 - Presentation / Specifications Page 11 - DIRT Showdown
Page 2 - The card Page 12 - Far Cry 3
Page 3 - Photo Gallery / Delivery Page 13 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 14 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 5 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 15 - Metro: Last Light
Page 6 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 16 - GTA V
Page 7 - BattleField 3 Page 17 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - Bioshock Infinite Page 18 - Temperatures / Noise levels
Page 9 - Crysis 3 Page 19 - Performance/Price & Performance/Watt
Page 10 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 20 - Conclusion
[pagebreak]

Bioshock Infinite - Benchmark





Ultra Preset, 1920x1080, AA, no DDOF Average FPS
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 Ti GHz 122.41
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti Matrix Platinum 122.16
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC 113.45
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming GTX 780 OC Edition 103.53
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti 103.24
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum 102.86
ASUS Radeon R9 290X Matrix Platinum 102.20
PowerColor LCS R9 290X 100.03
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN 95.55
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 90.78
nVidia GeForce GTX 770 78.98
AMD Radeon HD 6990 78.01
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition 76.80
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 75.68
AMD Radeon R9 280X 75.44
MSI Gaming R9 280X OC Edition 73.48
MSI GTX 760 Gaming MINI-ITX 71.54
AMD Radeon HD 7970 70.13
nVidia GeForce GTX 670 67.87
nVidia GeForce GTX 760 62.41
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti 60.36
AMD Radeon R9 270X 54.79
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 52.91
AMD Radeon R9 270 51.11
nVidia GeForce GTX 580 51.04
AMD Radeon HD 7870 50.55
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 45.77
AMD Radeon HD 6970 43.20
AMD Radeon HD 7850 43.13
AMD Radeon HD 5870 39.28
AMD Radeon HD 6950 38.13
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti 34.89
AMD Radeon HD 7790 34.65
AMD Radeon HD 6870 33.69
AMD Radeon HD 5850 32.42
More is better





Page 1 - Presentation / Specifications Page 11 - DIRT Showdown
Page 2 - The card Page 12 - Far Cry 3
Page 3 - Photo Gallery / Delivery Page 13 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 14 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 5 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 15 - Metro: Last Light
Page 6 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 16 - GTA V
Page 7 - BattleField 3 Page 17 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - Bioshock Infinite Page 18 - Temperatures / Noise levels
Page 9 - Crysis 3 Page 19 - Performance/Price & Performance/Watt
Page 10 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 20 - Conclusion
[pagebreak]

Crysis 3





High Preset, 1920x1080, 8xMSAA, Very High Average FPS
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 Ti GHz 41.4
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti Matrix Platinum 41.2
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum 34.4
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti 33.8
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming GTX 780 OC Edition 33.2
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN 31.8
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 30.2
ASUS Radeon R9 290X Matrix Platinum 28.0
PowerColor LCS R9 290X 27.3
AMD Radeon HD 6990 26.8
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC 25.9
nVidia GeForce GTX 770 25.8
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 24.4
MSI GTX 760 Gaming MINI-ITX 23.0
nVidia GeForce GTX 670 22.2
MSI Gaming R9 280X OC Edition 20.8
nVidia GeForce GTX 760 20.4
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition 19.8
AMD Radeon R9 280X 19.4
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti 18.8
AMD Radeon HD 7970 18.4
nVidia GeForce GTX 580 17.0
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 16.8
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 15.0
AMD Radeon R9 270X 15.0
AMD Radeon HD 6970 14.6
AMD Radeon HD 7870 14.2
AMD Radeon R9 270 14.0
AMD Radeon HD 6950 12.2
AMD Radeon HD 7850 11.8
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti 10.2
AMD Radeon HD 6870 8.4
AMD Radeon HD 7790 8.0
AMD Radeon HD 5870 8.0
AMD Radeon HD 5850 7.6
More is better





Page 1 - Presentation / Specifications Page 11 - DIRT Showdown
Page 2 - The card Page 12 - Far Cry 3
Page 3 - Photo Gallery / Delivery Page 13 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 14 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 5 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 15 - Metro: Last Light
Page 6 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 16 - GTA V
Page 7 - BattleField 3 Page 17 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - Bioshock Infinite Page 18 - Temperatures / Noise levels
Page 9 - Crysis 3 Page 19 - Performance/Price & Performance/Watt
Page 10 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 20 - Conclusion
[pagebreak]

Call of Duty Black Ops 2





bgcolor="#F2F2F2" class="comparisonTable" onmouseover="style.backgroundColor='#FDD56A';" onmouseout="style.backgroundColor='#F2F2F2'" height="24px">
High Preset, 1920x1080, 8xMSAA, High Average FPS
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 Ti GHz 176.2
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti Matrix Platinum 172.1
ASUS Radeon R9 290X Matrix Platinum 146.3
PowerColor LCS R9 290X 146.0
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum 141.8
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti 137.2
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming GTX 780 OC Edition 134.0
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC 133.7
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN 130.2
AMD Radeon HD 6990 127.0
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 121.0
nVidia GeForce GTX 770 109.0
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 105.4
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition 103.6
MSI Gaming R9 280X OC Edition 103.0
AMD Radeon R9 280X 102.8
MSI GTX 760 Gaming MINI-ITX 99.0
nVidia GeForce GTX 670 95.8
AMD Radeon HD 7970 93.2
nVidia GeForce GTX 760 86.0
AMD Radeon R9 270X 84.4
nVidia GeForce GTX 580 81.8
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti 81.4
AMD Radeon HD 7870 79.2
AMD Radeon R9 270 79.0
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 72.0
AMD Radeon HD 7850 69.0
AMD Radeon HD 6970 68.6
AMD Radeon HD 5870 64.6
AMD Radeon HD 6950 62.4
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 62.4
AMD Radeon HD 6870 58.4
AMD Radeon HD 5850 54.4
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti 48.2
AMD Radeon HD 7790 46.4
More is better





Page 1 - Presentation / Specifications Page 11 - DIRT Showdown
Page 2 - The card Page 12 - Far Cry 3
Page 3 - Photo Gallery / Delivery Page 13 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 14 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 5 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 15 - Metro: Last Light
Page 6 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 16 - GTA V
Page 7 - BattleField 3 Page 17 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - Bioshock Infinite Page 18 - Temperatures / Noise levels
Page 9 - Crysis 3 Page 19 - Performance/Price & Performance/Watt
Page 10 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 20 - Conclusion
[pagebreak]

DIRT Showdown - Benchmark





High Preset, 1920x1080, 8xMSAA, Ultra Average FPS
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 Ti GHz 119.36
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti Matrix Platinum 119.29
ASUS Radeon R9 290X Matrix Platinum 108.86
PowerColor LCS R9 290X 107.93
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC 105.76
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti 98.04
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum 94.90
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming GTX 780 OC Edition 89.13
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN 87.97
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 82.36
MSI Gaming R9 280X OC Edition 81.65
AMD Radeon HD 6990 80.30
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition 79.22
AMD Radeon R9 280X 76.46
AMD Radeon HD 7970 71.63
nVidia GeForce GTX 770 68.79
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 67.04
AMD Radeon R9 270X 64.63
AMD Radeon R9 270 62.99
AMD Radeon HD 7870 62.53
nVidia GeForce GTX 670 58.98
MSI GTX 760 Gaming MINI-ITX 58.50
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti 54.27
nVidia GeForce GTX 760 52.48
AMD Radeon HD 7850 50.61
nVidia GeForce GTX 580 48.92
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 45.35
AMD Radeon HD 6970 44.19
AMD Radeon HD 7790 43.28
AMD Radeon HD 6950 38.94
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 38.02
AMD Radeon HD 5870 36.48
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti 30.35
AMD Radeon HD 6870 30.05
AMD Radeon HD 5850 29.13
More is better





Page 1 - Presentation / Specifications Page 11 - DIRT Showdown
Page 2 - The card Page 12 - Far Cry 3
Page 3 - Photo Gallery / Delivery Page 13 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 14 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 5 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 15 - Metro: Last Light
Page 6 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 16 - GTA V
Page 7 - BattleField 3 Page 17 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - Bioshock Infinite Page 18 - Temperatures / Noise levels
Page 9 - Crysis 3 Page 19 - Performance/Price & Performance/Watt
Page 10 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 20 - Conclusion
[pagebreak]

Far Cry 3





High Preset, 1920x1080, 8xMSAA, Ultra Average FPS
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 Ti GHz 65.4
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti Matrix Platinum 62.8
ASUS Radeon R9 290X Matrix Platinum 54.9
PowerColor LCS R9 290X 53.3
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti 53.2
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum 52.4
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC 50.0
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN 50.2
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming GTX 780 OC Edition 49.2
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 47.2
AMD Radeon HD 6990 39.8
nVidia GeForce GTX 770 38.2
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 35.6
MSI Gaming R9 280X OC Edition 34.8
nVidia GeForce GTX 670 32.2
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition 31.0
MSI GTX 760 Gaming MINI-ITX 30.9
AMD Radeon R9 280X 30.0
nVidia GeForce GTX 760 29.4
AMD Radeon HD 7970 27.8
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti 27.0
nVidia GeForce GTX 580 24.8
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 24.6
AMD Radeon R9 270X 23.8
AMD Radeon HD 7870 22.4
AMD Radeon R9 270 22.0
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 21.2
AMD Radeon HD 6970 20.6
AMD Radeon HD 6950 18.0
AMD Radeon HD 7850 17.8
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti 15.4
AMD Radeon HD 5870 15.2
AMD Radeon HD 6870 13.0
AMD Radeon HD 5850 13.0
AMD Radeon HD 7790 10.6
More is better





Page 1 - Presentation / Specifications Page 11 - DIRT Showdown
Page 2 - The card Page 12 - Far Cry 3
Page 3 - Photo Gallery / Delivery Page 13 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 14 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 5 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 15 - Metro: Last Light
Page 6 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 16 - GTA V
Page 7 - BattleField 3 Page 17 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - Bioshock Infinite Page 18 - Temperatures / Noise levels
Page 9 - Crysis 3 Page 19 - Performance/Price & Performance/Watt
Page 10 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 20 - Conclusion
[pagebreak]

Sleeping Dogs - Benchmark





High Preset, 1920x1080, Extreme, High-Res Textures Average FPS
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 Ti GHz 80.9
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti Matrix Platinum 76.0
ASUS Radeon R9 290X Matrix Platinum 72.4
PowerColor LCS R9 290X 69.9
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti 69.8
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum 66.3
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC 65.9
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming GTX 780 OC Edition 63.8
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN 62.4
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 58.7
AMD Radeon HD 6990 56.6
MSI Gaming R9 280X OC Edition 52.1
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition 51.7
nVidia GeForce GTX 770 51.7
AMD Radeon R9 280X 50.7
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 48.7
AMD Radeon HD 7970 47.0
nVidia GeForce GTX 670 42.7
MSI GTX 760 Gaming MINI-ITX 42.2
nVidia GeForce GTX 760 38.7
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti 38.7
AMD Radeon R9 270X 36.4
nVidia GeForce GTX 580 35.1
AMD Radeon R9 270 34.2
AMD Radeon HD 7870 33.8
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 32.0
AMD Radeon HD 6970 30.0
AMD Radeon HD 7850 27.6
AMD Radeon HD 5870 27.3
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 26.3
AMD Radeon HD 6950 26.2
AMD Radeon HD 6870 22.9
AMD Radeon HD 7790 22.2
AMD Radeon HD 5850 22.2
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti 19.9
More is better





Page 1 - Presentation / Specifications Page 11 - DIRT Showdown
Page 2 - The card Page 12 - Far Cry 3
Page 3 - Photo Gallery / Delivery Page 13 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 14 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 5 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 15 - Metro: Last Light
Page 6 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 16 - GTA V
Page 7 - BattleField 3 Page 17 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - Bioshock Infinite Page 18 - Temperatures / Noise levels
Page 9 - Crysis 3 Page 19 - Performance/Price & Performance/Watt
Page 10 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 20 - Conclusion
[pagebreak]

The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim





High Preset, 1920x1080, 8xAA, Ultra Average FPS
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti Matrix Platinum 136.5
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 Ti GHz 136.4
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum 135.0
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti 135.0
ASUS Radeon R9 290X Matrix Platinum 133.3
PowerColor LCS R9 290X 133.2
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming GTX 780 OC Edition 132.0
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN 127.2
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 126.2
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC 123.1
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition 110.4
AMD Radeon HD 6990 109.2
nVidia GeForce GTX 770 109.0
MSI Gaming R9 280X OC Edition 107.0
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 106.4
AMD Radeon R9 280X 106.0
AMD Radeon HD 7970 98.6
MSI GTX 760 Gaming MINI-ITX 96.7
nVidia GeForce GTX 670 96.4
AMD Radeon R9 270X 90.4
nVidia GeForce GTX 760 87.6
AMD Radeon HD 7870 85.2
nVidia GeForce GTX 580 84.8
AMD Radeon R9 270 82.8
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti 81.4
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 73.0
AMD Radeon HD 7850 71.0
AMD Radeon HD 6970 64.0
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 63.2
AMD Radeon HD 6950 58.4
AMD Radeon HD 5870 56.6
AMD Radeon HD 7790 56.2
AMD Radeon HD 6870 52.0
AMD Radeon HD 5850 48.6
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti 47.2
More is better





Page 1 - Presentation / Specifications Page 11 - DIRT Showdown
Page 2 - The card Page 12 - Far Cry 3
Page 3 - Photo Gallery / Delivery Page 13 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 14 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 5 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 15 - Metro: Last Light
Page 6 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 16 - GTA V
Page 7 - BattleField 3 Page 17 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - Bioshock Infinite Page 18 - Temperatures / Noise levels
Page 9 - Crysis 3 Page 19 - Performance/Price & Performance/Watt
Page 10 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 20 - Conclusion
[pagebreak]

Metro: Last Light - Benchmark





Very High, 1920x1080, SSAA, DX11 Average FPS
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 Ti GHz 55.19
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti Matrix Platinum 54.83
ASUS Radeon R9 290X Matrix Platinum 48.14
PowerColor LCS R9 290X 46.58
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti 45.19
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC 43.36
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum 44.49
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming GTX 780 OC Edition 42.94
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN 39.94
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 38.18
MSI Gaming R9 280X OC Edition 33.97
AMD Radeon R9 280X 33.78
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition 33.41
nVidia GeForce GTX 770 32.53
AMD Radeon HD 7970 30.98
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 30.56
AMD Radeon HD 6990 27.65
nVidia GeForce GTX 670 27.30
MSI GTX 760 Gaming MINI-ITX 27.28
nVidia GeForce GTX 760 25.09
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti 23.97
AMD Radeon R9 270X 23.46
nVidia GeForce GTX 580 23.25
AMD Radeon R9 270 21.93
AMD Radeon HD 7870 21.58
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 20.84
AMD Radeon HD 7850 18.09
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 17.83
AMD Radeon HD 6970 17.05
AMD Radeon HD 6950 15.22
AMD Radeon HD 7790 14.94
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti 13.83
AMD Radeon HD 5870 13.33
AMD Radeon HD 6870 12.37
AMD Radeon HD 5850 11.11
More is better





Page 1 - Presentation / Specifications Page 11 - DIRT Showdown
Page 2 - The card Page 12 - Far Cry 3
Page 3 - Photo Gallery / Delivery Page 13 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 14 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 5 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 15 - Metro: Last Light
Page 6 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 16 - GTA V
Page 7 - BattleField 3 Page 17 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - Bioshock Infinite Page 18 - Temperatures / Noise levels
Page 9 - Crysis 3 Page 19 - Performance/Price & Performance/Watt
Page 10 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 20 - Conclusion
[pagebreak]

Grand Theft Auto V






Page 1 - Presentation / Specifications Page 11 - DIRT Showdown
Page 2 - The card Page 12 - Far Cry 3
Page 3 - Photo Gallery / Delivery Page 13 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 14 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 5 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 15 - Metro: Last Light
Page 6 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 16 - GTA V
Page 7 - BattleField 3 Page 17 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - Bioshock Infinite Page 18 - Temperatures / Noise levels
Page 9 - Crysis 3 Page 19 - Performance/Price & Performance/Watt
Page 10 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 20 - Conclusion
[pagebreak]

Power Consumption





Power Consumption Idle* Watts
PowerColor LCS R9 290X 92
AMD Radeon HD 6990 (Ref) 80
nVidia GeForce GTX 580 (Ref) 69
ASUS Radeon R9 290X Matrix Platinum 67
MSI Gaming R9 280X OC Edition 65
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition (ASUS Matrix P.) 60
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming GTX 780 OC Edition 59
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC 57
AMD Radeon HD 6970 (Ref) 57
AMD Radeon HD 6950 (Ref) 57
MSI GTX 760 Gaming MINI-ITX 57
AMD Radeon HD 5850 (Ref) 56
AMD Radeon HD 6870 (Ref) 54
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 (ASUS DC2OC) 54
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti (ASUS DC2T) 54
AMD Radeon HD 5870 (Ref) 53
AMD Radeon R9 270 (ASUS DC2OC) 53
nVidia GeForce GTX 770 (ASUS DC2OC) 53
nVidia GeForce GTX 670 (ASUS DC2T) 52
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 (Ref) 51
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 (ASUS DC2T) 50
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti Matrix Platinum 49
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 Ti GHz 48
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti (GBT GHz) 48
AMD Radeon HD 7870 (ASUS DC2T V2) 48
AMD Radeon R9 280X (ASUS DC2T) 48
AMD Radeon R9 270X (ASUS DC2T) 48
AMD Radeon HD 7970 (XFX DD - Ref PCB) 47
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN (Ref) 47
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti (ASUS DC2T) 45
AMD Radeon HD 7850 (ASUS DC2T) 45
AMD Radeon HD 7790 (ASUS DC2OC - Ref PCB) 45
nVidia GeForce GTX 760 (ASUS DC2OC) 45
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost (Ref) 43
*Entire system Less is better


Power Consumption Load (FurMark)* Watts
AMD Radeon HD 6990 (Ref) 481
PowerColor LCS R9 290X 425
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC 421
ASUS Radeon R9 290X Matrix Platinum 401
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 Ti GHz 383
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti Matrix Platinum 380
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition (ASUS Matrix P.) 360
MSI Gaming R9 280X OC Edition 358
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti (GBT GHz) 333
AMD Radeon HD 7970 (XFX DD - Ref PCB) 323
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming GTX 780 OC Edition 321
AMD Radeon R9 280X (ASUS DC2T) 320
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN (Ref) 306
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 (ASUS DC2OC) 302
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 (Ref) 258
nVidia GeForce GTX 770 (ASUS DC2OC) 257
nVidia GeForce GTX 580 (Ref) 254
AMD Radeon HD 6970 (Ref) 244
MSI GTX 760 Gaming MINI-ITX 241
AMD Radeon HD 5870 (Ref) 232
nVidia GeForce GTX 670 (ASUS DC2T) 227
AMD Radeon R9 270X (ASUS DC2T) 223
AMD Radeon HD 7870 (ASUS DC2T V2) 220
nVidia GeForce GTX 760 (ASUS DC2OC) 218
AMD Radeon HD 6950 (Ref) 208
AMD Radeon HD 6870 (Ref) 200
AMD Radeon HD 7850 (ASUS DC2T) 195
AMD Radeon R9 270 (ASUS DC2OC) 194
AMD Radeon HD 5850 (Ref) 193
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti (ASUS DC2T) 178
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 (ASUS DC2T) 177
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost (Ref) 169
AMD Radeon HD 7790 (ASUS DC2OC - Ref PCB) 152
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti (ASUS DC2T) 151
*Entire system Less is better





Page 1 - Presentation / Specifications Page 11 - DIRT Showdown
Page 2 - The card Page 12 - Far Cry 3
Page 3 - Photo Gallery / Delivery Page 13 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 14 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 5 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 15 - Metro: Last Light
Page 6 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 16 - GTA V
Page 7 - BattleField 3 Page 17 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - Bioshock Infinite Page 18 - Temperatures / Noise levels
Page 9 - Crysis 3 Page 19 - Performance/Price & Performance/Watt
Page 10 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 20 - Conclusion
[pagebreak]

Temperatures / Noise levels

Fan Speed


Auto Auto 50% 70% 100%
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 DirectCU II OC 1'129 1'493 2'078 3'023
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum 1'040 1'910 2'650 3'770
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti Matrix Platinum 980 1'490 2'080 3'000
ASUS Radeon HD 7970 Matrix Platinum 1'100 2'180 2'780 3'000
ASUS Radeon R9 280X DirectCU II Top 1'020 1'860 2'620 3'000
ASUS Radeon R9 280X Matrix Platinum 1'050 2'090 2'900 3'200
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC 1'025 1'805 2'575 3.040
ASUS Radeon R9 290X DirectCU II 1'050 1'930 2'680 3'040
ASUS Radeon R9 290X Matrix Platinum 1'035 1'875 2'630 3'000
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 GHz Edition 780 2'180 3'100 4'380
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 OC V2 780 2'180 3'100 4'380
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming GTX 780 1'040 1'450 2'000 2'900
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming R9 280X OC Edition 1'035 2'045 2'470 3'040
PowerColor Radeon R9 280X TurboDuo OC 995 2'000 2'740 3'520
PowerColor Radeon R9 290X LCS
Watercooled
NVIDIA Reference 1'250 2'060 n/A 4'240
Less is better


Noise Level


Auto Auto 50% 70% 100%
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 DirectCU II OC 33.2 37.1 43.0 51.4
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum 32.0 36.6 42.7 51.2
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti Matrix Platinum 32.8 37.2 43.0 53.4
ASUS Radeon HD 7970 Matrix Platinum 34.1 40.7 49.4 51.9
ASUS Radeon R9 280X DirectCU II Top 33.4 36.3 50.5 54.0
ASUS Radeon R9 280X Matrix Platinum 33.5 37.1 43.3 49.5
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC 32.9 41.6 49.2 52.5
ASUS Radeon R9 290X DirectCU II 33.0 41.8 49.5 52.5
ASUS Radeon R9 290X Matrix Platinum 33.0 41.2 49.6 52.7
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 GHz Edition 32.0 37.1 44.4 52.3
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 OC V2 32.0 37.1 44.4 52.3
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming GTX 780 32.0 34.3 40.2 50.0
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming R9 280X OC Edition 32.0 36.6 44.0 49.0
PowerColor Radeon R9 280X TurboDuo OC 32.3 34.0 43.3 49.5
PowerColor Radeon R9 290X LCS
Watercooled
NVIDIA Reference 33.2 39.8 n/A 56.2
Less is better


For the noise level results, we measured the noise level using a decibel meter (Voltcraft SL-200) located at 1 meter away from the graphics card.

Idle Temperature

Temperature Auto 50% 70% 100%
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 DirectCU II OC 30 29 28 28
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum 32 31 30 29
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti Matrix Platinum 37 37 36 34
ASUS Radeon HD 7970 Matrix Platinum 28 28 28 27
ASUS Radeon R9 280X DirectCU II Top 30 30 29 29
ASUS Radeon R9 280X Matrix Platinum 30 30 29 29
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC 38 36 35 34
ASUS Radeon R9 290X DirectCU II 36 35 34 34
ASUS Radeon R9 290X Matrix Platinum 37 36 35 34
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 GHz Edition 29 27 26 26
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 OC V2 30 29 28 28
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming GTX 780 30 29 29 27
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming R9 280X OC Edition 32 31 30 29
PowerColor Radeon R9 280X TurboDuo OC 32 32 31 30
PowerColor Radeon R9 290X LCS

29

NVIDIA Reference 32 30 29 29
Less is better

 


Idle, temperature is taken after 15 minutes @ lowest, 40 %, 50 %, 70 % and 100 % fan speed.
Room Temperature: 25°C

Temperature under Furmark


Temperature Auto 50% 70% 100%
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 DirectCU II OC 83 71 63 56
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti Matrix Platinum 77 77 72 68
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum 90 81 72 62
ASUS Radeon HD 7970 Matrix Platinum 76 70 69 69
ASUS Radeon R9 280X DirectCU II Top 90 71 64 63
ASUS Radeon R9 280X Matrix Platinum 77 73 71 70
ASUS Radeon R9 290X DirectCU II 89 90 85 81
ASUS Radeon R9 290X Matrix Platinum 88 85 82 78
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC 90 87 81 77
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 GHz Edition 90 80 73 58
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 OC V2 90 83 75 63
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming GTX 780 73 71 63 56
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming R9 280X OC Edition 80 77 72 69
PowerColor R9 290X LCS
46
PowerColor R9 280X TurboDuo OC n/A n/A 74 68
NVIDIA Reference 90 83 76 68
Less is better


For FurMark, temperature is taken after 15 minutes of GPU Burn test at lowest, 40 %, 50 %, 70 % and 100 % fan speed.
We stopped the test when the GPU temperature hit 90°C.
Room Temperature: 25°C

Temperature and fan speed under BattleField 3


Auto Temperature
PowerColor R9 290X LCS (watercooled) 39
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming R9 280X OC Edition 60
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti Matrix Platinum 66
ASUS Radeon HD 7970 Matrix Platinum 66
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming GTX 780 66
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 GHz Edition 67
ASUS Radeon R9 280X Matrix Platinum 68
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC 68
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 DirectCU II OC 69
ASUS Radeon R9 280X DirectCU II Top 69
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 OC V2 70
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum 71
ASUS Radeon R9 290X Matrix Platinum 72
PowerColor R9 280X TurboDuo OC 73
ASUS Radeon R9 290X DirectCU II 79
NVIDIA Reference 79
Less is better


For BattleField 3, temperature and fan speed values taken are the highest achieved after 1 hour gaming @ auto fan speed.



Page 1 - Presentation / Specifications Page 11 - DIRT Showdown
Page 2 - The card Page 12 - Far Cry 3
Page 3 - Photo Gallery / Delivery Page 13 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 14 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 5 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 15 - Metro: Last Light
Page 6 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 16 - GTA V
Page 7 - BattleField 3 Page 17 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - Bioshock Infinite Page 18 - Temperatures / Noise levels
Page 9 - Crysis 3 Page 19 - Performance/Price & Performance/Watt
Page 10 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 20 - Conclusion
[pagebreak]

Performance/Watt


Graphics Cards Performance Index Power C. (Watts)* Performance/Watt*10
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti (PowerColor DC2T) 53.55 178 3.01
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN (Ref) 85.05 306 2.78
nVidia GeForce GTX 770 (PowerColor DC2OC) 70.92 257 2.76
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 Ti GHz 104.63 383 2.73
nVidia GeForce GTX 670 (PowerColor DC2T) 62.00 227 2.73
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti (GBT GHz) 90.53 333 2.72
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 (PowerColor DC2OC) 81.66 302 2.70
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 (PowerColor DC2T) 47.37 177 2.68
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 (Ref) 68.36 258 2.65
nVidia GeForce GTX 760 (PowerColor DC2OC) 56.63 218 2.60
AMD Radeon R9 270 (PowerColor DC2OC) 50.00 195 2.56
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti Matrix Platinum 100.42 380 2.51
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost (Ref) 40.87 169 2.42
AMD Radeon R9 270X (PowerColor DC2T) 53.85 230 2.34
AMD Radeon HD 7870 (PowerColor DC2T V2) 50.53 219 2.31
AMD Radeon HD 7850 (PowerColor DC2T) 42.39 190 2.23
AMD Radeon HD 7790 (PowerColor DC2OC - Ref PCB) 33.44 151 2.21
ASUS Radeon R9 290X Matrix Platinum 88.15 401 2.20
PowerColor Radeon R9 290X LCS 91.19 420 2.17
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition (PowerColor Matrix P.) 70.75 325 2.18
AMD Radeon R9 280X (PowerColor DC2T) 68.85 321 2.14
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC 83.78 421 2.09
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti (PowerColor DC2T) 30.80 151 2.04
nVidia GeForce GTX 580 (Ref) 50.49 254 1.99
AMD Radeon HD 7970 (XFX DD - Ref PCB) 64.27 329 1.95
AMD Radeon HD 6950 (Ref) 36.83 208 1.77
AMD Radeon HD 6970 (Ref) 41.19 252 1.63
AMD Radeon HD 6870 (Ref) 31.88 200 1.59
AMD Radeon HD 5850 (Ref) 30.05 193 1.56
AMD Radeon HD 5870 (Ref) 35.98 232 1.55
AMD Radeon HD 6990 (Ref) 73.44 500 1.47
*Entire system More is better Less is better More is better


The "Performance Index" value is calculated as the sum of all benchmarks results divided by the amount of games (3DMark and Unigine are not included into the calculation).

Performance/Price


Graphics Cards Performance Index Price (€)* Performance/€*10
ASUS Radeon R9 290X Matrix Platinum n/A n/A n/A
ASUSGeForce GTX 780 Ti Matrix Platinum n/A n/A n/A
AMD Radeon HD 7790 33.44 91 3.67
AMD Radeon HD 7870 50.53 143 3.53
AMD Radeon R9 270 50.00 144 3.47
AMD Radeon HD 7850 42.39 124 3.42
AMD Radeon R9 270X 53.85 159 3.39
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 40.87 121 3.38
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 47.37 144 3.29
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti 30.80 100 3.08
AMD Radeon R9 280X 68.85 241 2.86
nVidia GeForce GTX 760 56.63 199 2.85
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti 53.55 193 2.77
AMD Radeon HD 7970 64.27 232 2.77
nVidia GeForce GTX 670 62.00 228 2.72
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition 70.75 260 2.72
nVidia GeForce GTX 770 70.92 266 2.67
nVidia GeForce GTX 580 50.49 190 2.66
AMD Radeon HD 6870 31.88 126 2.53
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 68.36 291 2.35
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC 83.78 379 2.21
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 81.66 415 1.97
AMD Radeon HD 6950 36.83 205 1.80
PowerColor Radeon R9 290X LCS 91.19 577 1.58
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti 90.53 582 1.56
AMD Radeon HD 6970 41.19 310 1.33
AMD Radeon HD 5850 30.05 260 1.16
AMD Radeon HD 5870 35.98 335 1.07
AMD Radeon HD 6990 73.44 708 1.04
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN 85.05 832 1.02
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 Ti GHz 104.63 613 N/A
* 06/01/2014 More is better Less is better More is better


For the price we took the lowest price available on geizhals.eu.



Page 1 - Presentation / Specifications Page 11 - DIRT Showdown
Page 2 - The card Page 12 - Far Cry 3
Page 3 - Photo Gallery / Delivery Page 13 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 14 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 5 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 15 - Metro: Last Light
Page 6 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 16 - GTA V
Page 7 - BattleField 3 Page 17 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - Bioshock Infinite Page 18 - Temperatures / Noise levels
Page 9 - Crysis 3 Page 19 - Performance/Price & Performance/Watt
Page 10 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 20 - Conclusion
[pagebreak]

Conclusion


General + -
With the new Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC ASUS has an almost flawless custom R9 graphics card in its portfolio. The card is fast but not as fast as its big brother, the R9 290X, does not throttle like reference models since the DirectCU II cooler does a great job, has a nice design, a decent factory overclock of more than 50 MHz over the reference design and even the memory is overclocked, which is quite rare these days. Thanks to custom PCB and the strong VRM design with three phase more than reference design on GPU as well as the Digi+, a digital phase controller which is controlling eight phases, the new ASUS R9 290 Direct CU II will probably end up to be one of the best R9 290 graphics cards on the market. ASUS has been using the same controller for a long time now and it has been also used on some high-end motherboard in the past. The cooling performance is on a very competitive level and we really liked the fact that ASUS decided to equip the card with a DIP switch but went for a different BIOS configuration, with silent and performance BIOS options. In addition to the backplate ASUS also used a reinforcing bar which adds to the overall quality of the R9 290 DirectCU II OC.   - Performance
- Cooling performance
- Design
- colored stickers bundled
- Backplate
- Memory Clock
- Noise levels
- BIOS DIP switch
- Bundle
 
Cooling / Noise Level   + -
Honestly, we are quite positively surprised by this cooler. In the past we did not agree with several decisions made regarding fan profiles, but this cooler is excellent and it definitely can't be compared to any reference cooler.

In performance mode (BIOS SW2) temperatures are very good but in this case the graphics card starts to be well audible under load (49.2 dBA). With the silent BIOS (SW1) temperatures are high, and hover around 95°C for the GPU, but the result is a very silent graphics card as the fans do not spin much higher than when the GPU is in idle state. The BIOS DIP switch is really a nice feature here and we would love to see this on all high-end graphics cards.
  - Cooling performance
- Noise levels
 
Performance   + -
Overall, the performance is very good since the DirectCU II model does not throttle like the reference cards. The factory overclocking on the GPU and the memory, paired with the good cooling solution, make this Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC, a tad bit faster than the reference Radeon R9 290.
A closer look at the power consumption reveals that the figures are reasonably good with 57 Watts in idle. It is 10 Watts lower than the R9 290X Matrix for example. Under load, it is a different story. The measured 421 Watts is quite something, but can also be expected, since there is a Hawaii GPU doing its job underneath the massive cooler. The overall performance/watt is therefore not as competitive as with NVIDIA graphics cards.
  - Performance - Power consumption
 
Recommendation / Price   + -
The Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC from ASUS is a very good graphics card. The noise levels with the performance BIOS could be a tad little bit better, but since it is a performance BIOS there is definitely nothing too serious to complain about. Also the pricing is appropriate. This card might cost 45 Euro more than a reference R9 290 but since it is as fast as a lot of other versions, which costs the same or even higher, pricing is just about right.   - Gaming
 
We gave the Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC from ASUS 4.5 out of 5 stars.
 







Page 1 - Presentation / Specifications Page 11 - DIRT Showdown
Page 2 - The card Page 12 - Far Cry 3
Page 3 - Photo Gallery / Delivery Page 13 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 14 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 5 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 15 - Metro: Last Light
Page 6 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 16 - GTA V
Page 7 - BattleField 3 Page 17 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - Bioshock Infinite Page 18 - Temperatures / Noise levels
Page 9 - Crysis 3 Page 19 - Performance/Price & Performance/Watt
Page 10 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 20 - Conclusion