There are quite a few custom Radeon R9 290 graphics cards available meanwhile and today we are going to have a look at the ASUS one, the Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC. The Radeon R9 290 version is no different from other high-end DirectCU II cards from the manufacturer, you don't change a formula that works. The R9 290 DirectCU II OC features a custom PCB with a beefed up power design and is chilled by the latest version of the DirectCU II cooler. Other than the obvious the card has a factory overclocking on both the core and memory as well as a BIOS DIP switch allowing users to choose between a silent or a performance operation.
The new ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II
OC graphics card features a custom PCB design, which received a beefed up power
design, the quite famous DirectCU II cooler as
well as a decent factory overclock. At a first glance it looks
like the new R9 290
DirectCU II OC shares the same cooler as the R9 290X and the GTX 780 Ti DirectCU II series
while the
PCB is similar to the one on the R9 290X DirectCU II series, which are definitely
good starting points.
Since this is the DirectCU II OC version of the ASUS Radeon R9 290 series, the
graphics card comes with a decent factory overclock.
While the reference AMD Radeon R9 290 GPU is set to work at up to 947 MHz, the
ASUS DirectCU II OC one works at 1'000 MHz. ASUS also decided to overclock the
GDDR5 memory on its card from 1'000 MHz (4'000 MHz effective) to 1'260 MHz
(5'040
MHz
effective).
During our testing the ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC held 1'000 MHz most
of the time while being under load. We have only experienced downclocking when
running FurMark, where the GPU clock was going down to to 920 MHz with the temperature increase. We
did not notice any throttling while gaming which is a very good
point for the custom ASUS card compared to the reference cards which were
throttling most of the time.
ASUS decided to equip the Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC with the latest
revision of their famous DirectCU II cooler. It is exactly the same cooler ASUS puts on
the GeForce GTX 780 and the 780 Ti DirectCU II series, and no changes have been made. In this case you get no less than five heatpipes,
two of which are six millimeter, two eight millimeter and one with a massive ten millimeter
diameter. The heatpipes have been nickel plated and are in direct contact with the GPU
core. Soldered to the heatpipes you will find the fin stack
which is being provided with fresh air via two 95mm fans. The fan closer to the I/O
shield is a hybrid axial/radial fan which ASUS likes to call "CoolTech".
They claim that this fan is able to provide a higher airflow than standard axial
or radial fans at the same noise level. In case of the second fan you find a
standard axial fan. Both fans are being manufactured by Everflow and strangely
share the same model name, T129215SU.
Overall the cooler is well made and the finish is on a very reasonable level
too. Good thermal paste has been spread all over the core in large quantity but
the memory chips did not get active cooling.
Like the reference model, the ASUS DirectCU II OC has a DIP switch to select
between two BIOS options. Unfortunately, the switch positions are not labeled.
The SW1 position is silent mode
and the SW2 is the performance mode. There is also no note in the bundled documentation
or on the website product page.
Unlike the reference model, ASUS chose to equip this graphics card
with a silent mode BIOS and a performance mode BIOS, rather than a normal/uber
mode BIOS options. In our opinion ASUS made the right choice. We have tested both modes
and surprisingly we did not experience any performance loss while using the
silent BIOS. The only difference we noticed were regarding the temperatures and
fan speeds. In case of the silent BIOS, the fan was always around lowest speed
between 20-25% and in this case the GPU temperature was around 90°C. These
temperature readings are nothing to be worried about as the R9 Series chip can take
it. With the performance BIOS, the card was
trying to keep the GPU temperature between 73 and 77°C (fan speed range:
40-50%).
This card allowed for a maximum stable
overclock to 1100 MHz on the GPU side and 1375 MHz on the memory side. We
used Furemark V1.11.0 Geeks3D benchmark with 15 minutes duration in order to
test the stability. With these
clocks we had to feed the GPU with 1.15 Volt and the memory ran at stock
voltages.
Like most of ASUS' recent high-end cards, the PCB on the ASUS R9 290 DirectCU II OC has been completely
reworked and the power design has been beefed-up. A closer look at it shows an 8-phase
power implementation for the main power design where the GPU gets six (there are
five on the reference card) and the memory gets remaining two phases. The PCB design
looks a lot like the one you get with the R9 290X DirectCU II model.
The main power design MOSFETs are being actively cooled via a black aluminum
heatsink/thermal pad combo. The manufacturer decided to equip its Radeon R9 290
DirectCU II with both metal reinforcement (located at the top end of the card) and
full backplate to prevent bending and protect the card at the same time.
Component wise ASUS uses a high
quality design, so called Super Alloy Power, components. Last but not least,
located at the rear of the PCB there are several voltage and modification points
(VDDCI, MVDD, VDDC, OVCI, OVM, OVC) as well as the ROG Connect soldering points.
Checking the
voltage regulation chip we find a digital multi-phase controller labelled Digi+ ASP1300
for the GPU, and one uP1631P from uPI Semiconductor for the memory.
The memory chips used are made by Elpida and carry the model number
W2032BBBG-6A-F. They are specified to run at 1'260 MHz (5'040 MHz effective).
The card ships well bolstered in a foam made mold. Bundled with the graphics
card are the user guide, the driver CD, two power converters (2x6-Pin-PCIe to
1x8-Pin-PCIe) as well as a case badge. We would have loved to find a few
additional goodies in the box but the bundle is not that bad either.
For the noise level results, we measured the noise
level using a decibel meter (Voltcraft SL-200) located at 1 meter away from the
graphics card.
Idle Temperature
Temperature
Auto
50%
70%
100%
ASUS GeForce GTX 780
DirectCU II OC
30
29
28
28
ASUS GeForce GTX 780
Poseidon Platinum
32
31
30
29
ASUS
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Matrix Platinum
37
37
36
34
ASUS Radeon HD 7970
Matrix Platinum
28
28
28
27
ASUS Radeon R9 280X
DirectCU II Top
30
30
29
29
ASUS Radeon R9 280X
Matrix Platinum
30
30
29
29
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC
38
36
35
34
ASUS Radeon R9 290X
DirectCU II
36
35
34
34
ASUS Radeon R9 290X
Matrix Platinum
37
36
35
34
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780
GHz Edition
29
27
26
26
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780
OC V2
30
29
28
28
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming
GTX 780
30
29
29
27
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming R9
280X OC Edition
32
31
30
29
PowerColor Radeon R9 280X
TurboDuo OC
32
32
31
30
PowerColor Radeon R9 290X LCS
29
NVIDIA Reference
32
30
29
29
Less is better
Idle, temperature is
taken after 15 minutes @ lowest, 40 %, 50 %, 70 % and 100 % fan speed.
Room Temperature: 25°C
Temperature under Furmark
Temperature
Auto
50%
70%
100%
ASUS GeForce GTX 780
DirectCU II OC
83
71
63
56
ASUS
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Matrix Platinum
77
77
72
68
ASUS GeForce GTX 780
Poseidon Platinum
90
81
72
62
ASUS Radeon HD 7970
Matrix Platinum
76
70
69
69
ASUS Radeon R9 280X
DirectCU II Top
90
71
64
63
ASUS Radeon R9 280X
Matrix Platinum
77
73
71
70
ASUS Radeon R9 290X
DirectCU II
89
90
85
81
ASUS Radeon R9 290X
Matrix Platinum
88
85
82
78
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC
90
87
81
77
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780
GHz Edition
90
80
73
58
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780
OC V2
90
83
75
63
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming
GTX 780
73
71
63
56
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming R9
280X OC Edition
80
77
72
69
PowerColor R9 290X LCS
46
PowerColor R9 280X
TurboDuo OC
n/A
n/A
74
68
NVIDIA Reference
90
83
76
68
Less is better
For FurMark, temperature is taken
after 15 minutes of GPU Burn test at lowest, 40 %, 50 %, 70 % and 100 % fan speed.
We stopped the test when the GPU temperature hit 90°C.
Room Temperature: 25°C
Temperature and
fan speed under BattleField 3
Auto
Temperature
PowerColor R9 290X LCS
(watercooled)
39
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming R9
280X OC Edition
60
ASUS
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Matrix Platinum
66
ASUS Radeon HD 7970
Matrix Platinum
66
MSI Twin Frozr Gaming
GTX 780
66
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780
GHz Edition
67
ASUS Radeon R9 280X
Matrix Platinum
68
ASUS Radeon R9 290
DirectCU II OC
68
ASUS GeForce GTX 780
DirectCU II OC
69
ASUS Radeon R9 280X
DirectCU II Top
69
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780
OC V2
70
ASUS GeForce GTX 780
Poseidon Platinum
71
ASUS Radeon R9 290X
Matrix Platinum
72
PowerColor R9 280X
TurboDuo OC
73
ASUS
Radeon R9 290X DirectCU II
79
NVIDIA Reference
79
Less is better
For BattleField 3, temperature and fan speed
values taken are the highest achieved after 1 hour gaming @ auto fan
speed.
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition (PowerColor Matrix P.)
70.75
325
2.18
AMD Radeon R9 280X (PowerColor DC2T)
68.85
321
2.14
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC
83.78
421
2.09
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti (PowerColor DC2T)
30.80
151
2.04
nVidia GeForce GTX 580 (Ref)
50.49
254
1.99
AMD Radeon HD 7970 (XFX DD - Ref PCB)
64.27
329
1.95
AMD Radeon HD 6950 (Ref)
36.83
208
1.77
AMD Radeon HD 6970 (Ref)
41.19
252
1.63
AMD Radeon HD 6870 (Ref)
31.88
200
1.59
AMD Radeon HD 5850 (Ref)
30.05
193
1.56
AMD Radeon HD 5870 (Ref)
35.98
232
1.55
AMD Radeon HD 6990 (Ref)
73.44
500
1.47
*Entire system
More is better
Less is better
More is better
The "Performance Index" value is calculated as the sum of all
benchmarks results divided by the amount of games (3DMark and Unigine are not
included into the calculation).
Performance/Price
Graphics Cards
Performance Index
Price (€)*
Performance/€*10
ASUS Radeon R9
290X Matrix Platinum
n/A
n/A
n/A
ASUSGeForce GTX
780 Ti Matrix Platinum
n/A
n/A
n/A
AMD Radeon HD 7790
33.44
91
3.67
AMD Radeon HD 7870
50.53
143
3.53
AMD Radeon R9 270
50.00
144
3.47
AMD Radeon HD 7850
42.39
124
3.42
AMD Radeon R9 270X
53.85
159
3.39
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
40.87
121
3.38
nVidia GeForce GTX 660
47.37
144
3.29
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti
30.80
100
3.08
AMD Radeon R9 280X
68.85
241
2.86
nVidia GeForce GTX 760
56.63
199
2.85
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti
53.55
193
2.77
AMD Radeon HD 7970
64.27
232
2.77
nVidia GeForce GTX 670
62.00
228
2.72
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition
70.75
260
2.72
nVidia GeForce GTX 770
70.92
266
2.67
nVidia GeForce GTX 580
50.49
190
2.66
AMD Radeon HD 6870
31.88
126
2.53
nVidia GeForce GTX 680
68.36
291
2.35
ASUS Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC
83.78
379
2.21
nVidia GeForce GTX 780
81.66
415
1.97
AMD Radeon HD 6950
36.83
205
1.80
PowerColor Radeon
R9 290X LCS
91.19
577
1.58
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti
90.53
582
1.56
AMD Radeon HD 6970
41.19
310
1.33
AMD Radeon HD 5850
30.05
260
1.16
AMD Radeon HD 5870
35.98
335
1.07
AMD Radeon HD 6990
73.44
708
1.04
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN
85.05
832
1.02
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 Ti GHz
104.63
613
N/A
* 06/01/2014
More is better
Less is better
More is better
For the price we took the lowest price available on geizhals.eu.
With the new Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC ASUS has an almost flawless
custom R9 graphics card
in its portfolio. The card is fast but not as fast as its big brother,
the R9 290X,
does not throttle like reference models since the DirectCU II cooler does
a great job, has a nice design, a decent
factory overclock of more than 50 MHz over the reference design and even the memory is overclocked, which is
quite rare these
days. Thanks to custom PCB and the strong VRM design with three phase more
than reference design on GPU as well as the Digi+, a digital phase controller
which is controlling eight phases, the new ASUS R9 290 Direct CU II will
probably end up to be one of the best R9 290 graphics cards on the
market. ASUS has been using
the same controller for a long time now and it has been also used on some
high-end motherboard in the past. The cooling performance is on a very competitive level and we
really liked the fact that ASUS decided to equip the card with a DIP switch
but went for a different BIOS
configuration, with silent and performance BIOS options. In
addition to the backplate ASUS also used a reinforcing bar which adds to
the overall quality of the R9 290 DirectCU II OC.
Honestly, we are quite positively surprised by this
cooler. In the past we did not agree with several decisions made
regarding fan profiles, but this cooler is excellent and it definitely
can't be compared to any reference cooler.
In performance mode (BIOS SW2) temperatures are very good but in this
case the graphics card starts to be well audible under load (49.2 dBA). With the
silent BIOS (SW1) temperatures are high, and hover around 95°C for the GPU, but
the result is a very silent graphics card as the fans do not spin much higher than when the
GPU is in idle state. The BIOS DIP switch is really a nice feature here and
we would love to see this on all high-end graphics cards.
- Cooling performance
- Noise levels
Performance
+
-
Overall, the performance is very good since the DirectCU
II model does not throttle like the reference cards. The factory overclocking on the
GPU and the memory, paired with the good cooling
solution, make this Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC, a tad bit faster than
the reference Radeon R9 290.
A closer look at the power consumption reveals that the figures are
reasonably good with 57 Watts in idle. It is 10 Watts lower than the R9
290X Matrix for example. Under load, it is a different story. The
measured 421 Watts is quite
something, but can also be expected, since there is a Hawaii GPU doing
its job underneath the massive cooler. The overall performance/watt is
therefore not as competitive as with NVIDIA graphics cards.
- Performance
- Power consumption
Recommendation / Price
+
-
The Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC from
ASUS is a very good graphics card. The noise levels with the performance
BIOS could be a tad little bit better, but since it is a performance
BIOS there is definitely nothing too serious to complain about. Also the
pricing is appropriate. This card might cost 45 Euro more than a
reference R9 290 but since it is as fast as a lot of other versions, which
costs the same or even higher, pricing is just about right.
- Gaming
We gave the
Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC from ASUS 4.5 out of 5 stars.