GeForce GTX 760 SLI vs. Radeon R9 290X
Category : Versus
Published by Hiwa Pouri on 23.04.14
Comparisons of two mid-range graphics cards with one high-end VGA are almost always good for some really interesting results. Today we're having a look at what two GTX 760 graphics cards can do agains one mighty AMD Radeon R9 290X. Both configurations cost about the same and we're really curious to find out which setup is going to be quicker.



  Article in English   Artikel in Deutsch   Article en français   Articolo in italiano




Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

Test Setup

Hardware

Mainboard
  • ASUS Maximus V Gene (BIOS 1802)
CPUs
  • Intel Core i7-3770K @ 4.0 GHz (Turbo On / HT On)
Memory
  • G.Skill Ares Dual Channel 2x8GB @ CL11-13-13-31-1T-Auto DDR3-2400 MHz
Graphic Cards (Driver)
  • AMD Radeon R9 290X
  • ASUS GeForce GTX 760 DirectCU II OC SLI
Drivers
  • Windows 7 x64 (up to date)
  • ASUS ForceWare 331.40 Beta
  • AMD Catalyst 13.11 BetaV1
  • Intel Chipset Driver 9.4.0.1026
Games and OS
  • Windows 7 x64 (Up to date on the ) 01/10/2013
  • All games were up to date on the 01/10/2013
HDD
  • OCZ Technology Octane 512 GB SSD
PSU
  • Seasonic Platinum SS-1000XP / 1000 Watts



Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

3DMark - Fire Strike Performance





Total Score Score Index
ASUS GeForce GTX 760 DirectCU II OC SLI 9'353 99.50 %
AMD Radeon R9 290X 9'400 100.00 %
     
Graphics Score Score Index
ASUS GeForce GTX 760 DirectCU II OC SLI 11'608 105.64 %
AMD Radeon R9 290X 10'988 100.00 %
More is better





3DMark - Fire Strike Extreme





 
Total Score Score Index
ASUS GeForce GTX 760 DirectCU II OC SLI 4'967 102.98 %
AMD Radeon R9 290X 4'823 100.00 %
     
Graphics Score Score Index
 ASUS GeForce GTX 760 DirectCU II OC SLI 5'747 112.66 %
AMD Radeon R9 290X 5'101 100.00 %
More is better





Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

Unigine Heaven 4.0 Extreme Preset





Total Score Score Index
ASUS GeForce GTX 760 DirectCU II OC SLI 1'863 106.21 %
AMD Radeon R9 290X 1'754 100.00 %
     
Frames per second FPS Index
ASUS GeForce GTX 760 DirectCU II OC SLI 73.9 107.25 %
AMD Radeon R9 290X 68.9 100.00 %
More is better





Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

BattleField 3





High Preset, 1920x1080, 4xMSAA, Ultra, SSAO FPS Index
ASUS GeForce GTX 760 DirectCU II OC SLI 113.6 114.75 %
AMD Radeon R9 290X 99.00 100.00 %
More is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

Bioshock Infinite - Benchmark





Ultra Preset, 1920x1080, AA, no DDOF FPS Index
ASUS GeForce GTX 760 DirectCU II OC SLI 116.80 116.76 %
AMD Radeon R9 290X 100.03 100.00 %
More is better





Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

Crysis 3





High Preset, 1920x1080, 8xMSAA, Very High FPS Index
ASUS GeForce GTX 760 DirectCU II OC SLI 40.4 147.99 %
AMD Radeon R9 290X 27.3 100.00 %
More is better





Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

Call of Duty Black Ops 2





High Preset, 1920x1080, 8xMSAA, High FPS Index
ASUS GeForce GTX 760 DirectCU II OC SLI 180.4 123.56 %
AMD Radeon R9 290X 146.0 100.00 %
More is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

DIRT Showdown - Benchmark



High Preset, 1920x1080, 8xMSAA, Ultra FPS Index
ASUS GeForce GTX 760 DirectCU II OC SLI 93.04 86.20 %
AMD Radeon R9 290X 107.93 100.00 %
More is better





Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

Far Cry 3





High Preset, 1920x1080, 8xMSAA, Ultra FPS Index
ASUS GeForce GTX 760 DirectCU II OC SLI 62.8 117.82 %
AMD Radeon R9 290X 53.3 100.00 %
More is better





Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

Sleeping Dogs - Benchmark





High Preset, 1920x1080, Extreme, High-Res Textures FPS Index
ASUS GeForce GTX 760 DirectCU II OC SLI 77.2 110.44 %
AMD Radeon R9 290X 69.9 100.00 %
More is better





Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim





High Preset, 1920x1080, 8xAA, Ultra FPS Index
ASUS GeForce GTX 760 DirectCU II OC SLI 131.0 98.35 %
AMD Radeon R9 290X 133.2 100.00 %
More is better





Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

Metro: Last Light - Benchmark





Very High, 1920x1080, SSAA, DX11 FPS Index
ASUS GeForce GTX 760 DirectCU II OC SLI 43.82 94.07 %
AMD Radeon R9 290X 46.58 100.00 %
More is better





Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

Grand Theft Auto V






Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

Power Consumption





Power Consumption Idle* Watts Index
ASUS GeForce GTX 760 DirectCU II OC SLI 51 84.47 %
AMD Radeon R9 290X 57 100.00 %
*Entire system Less is better


Power Consumption Load (FurMark)* Watts Index
ASUS GeForce GTX 760 DirectCU II OC SLI 478 112.47 %
AMD Radeon R9 290X 425 100.00 %
*Entire system Less is better






Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

Performance Index, price

  Index
ASUS GeForce GTX 760 DirectCU II OC SLI 112.21 %
AMD Radeon R9 290X 100.00 %
More is better


  Geizhals Toppreise
ASUS GeForce GTX 760 DirectCU II OC SLI Toppreise.ch
AMD Radeon R9 290X Toppreise.ch
 


Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

Conclusion

First of all lets talk about prices. Let's consider that the two GTX 760 DirectCU II OC together cost 399 Euro. Compare that to the 432 Euro you'd have to pay for the cheapest reference AMD Radeon R9 290X we can find. Therefore this one high-end card is is about 10 percent more than the two mid-range models.  

To dive a bit deeper into the results, we start with performance differences in 3DMark graphics score where we see that the SLI of two GTX 760 is between 5 and 12 percent faster than the AMD Radeon R9 290X. In the next theoretical test we ran, Unigine Heaven, we see that the two 760's are on average 7 percent quicker than the AMD Radeon R9 290X. In case of games it turns out that for example in Dirt Showdown the AMD Radeon R9 290X is about 16 percent quicker than the two smaller cards in SLI. A closer look at Crysis 3 shows the other end of the scale, where the two GTX 760 score 48 percent better than the single AMD Radeon R9 290X. In case of ultra high resolutions we would see the two smaller cards lack behind, since they features less video memory.

Overall the two GTX 760 cards are performing really well and there is no doubt the two of them are seriously quick, actually, on average they're 12 pecent quicker than one AMD Radeon R9 290X. Last but no least there is the power consumption which is 12 percent higher than with one single AMD Radeon R9 290X. If you're actually thinking about buying two GTX 760's make sure you go for models with 4 Gigabyte VRAM otherwise the AMD Radeon R9 290X will be quicker playing games at ultra high resolutions. When it comes to price/performance, than the two GTX 760 in SLI are simply great. Since drivers are meanwhile quite well optimized for SLI, almost any new game is supported with well balanced profiles.


Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown