ASRock X99 WS Review
Category : X99
Published by Hiwa Pouri on 29.08.14
With the X99 WS, ASRock already has an X99 motherboard ready for launch day and this particular model comes with a reasonable feature mix. It doesn't take long until you see that ASRock did not overexaggerat equipping this board with additional chips, which is something that's reflected in the price. Let's have a look then if ASRock did a good job with their X99 WS.



  Article in English   Artikel in Deutsch  Article en français  Articolo in italiano




With the X99 WS ASRock is amongst the few motherboard makers that have a new X99 motherboard ready at launch day. Overall this board features a new color scheme as well as a rather reasonable feature mix and we're definitely curious to find out what this board can do.

Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Specs and Delivery

Chipset Intel X99
Memory Quad Channel DDR4, 8 x DIMM, Max. 64 GB DDR3, 2933+(OC) / 2800(OC) / 2400(OC) / 2133 MHz Non-ECC, Un-buffered Memory
Multi-GPU
  • Supports NVIDIA 4-way SLI Technology
  • Supports AMD 4-way CrossFireX Technology
Slots
  • 40 Lane CPU
    • 5 x PCIe 3.0 x16 (x16, dual x16, x16/x16/x8, x8/x8/x16/x8, x8/x8/x8/x8)
    • 1 x PCIe 2.0 x4 (28 lane CPU)
  • 28 Lane CPU
    • 3 x PCI Express 3.0/2.0 x16 slots (x16, x16/x8, x8/x8/x8)
    • 2 x PCI Express 2.0 x16 slot (max at x1 mode)
    • 1 x PCI Express 2.0 x4 slot (compatible with x1 and x4 devices)
  • 1 x M.2 x4 slot
Sound Realtek ALC1150 8-Channel High Definition Audio CODEC
  • Supports : Jack-detection, Multi-streaming, Front Panel Jack-retasking
  • Blu-ray audio layer Content Protection
  • Optical S/PDIF out port(s) at back panel
 
Storage
  • 10 x SATA 6Gb/s port(s), red
  • Support Raid 0, 1, 5, 10
  • Intel Rapid Storage Technology support
  • Supports Intel Dynamic Storage Accelerator, Intel Smart Response Technology, Intel Rapid Start Technology, Intel Smart Connect Technology
Network
  • Intel I217LM Gigabit LAN
  • Intel I210AT Gigabit LAN
  • Supports Wake-On-LAN
  • Supports Dual LAN Teaming
  • Supports Energy Efficient Ethernet 802.3az
  • Supports PXE
Internal Connectors
  • 2 x COM Port Headers
  • 1 x TPM Header
  • 1 x Power LED Header
  • 2 x CPU Fan Connectors (1 x 4-pin, 1 x 3-pin)
  • 3 x Chassis Fan Connectors (1 x 4-pin, 2 x 3-pin)
  • 1 x Power Fan Connector (3-pin)
  • 1 x 24 pin ATX Power Connector
  • 1 x 8 pin 12V Power Connector
  • 1 x HDD Saver Connector
  • 2 x PCIe Power Connectors
  • 1 x Front Panel Audio Connector
  • 1 x Thunderbolt AIC Connecotr
  • 2 x USB 2.0 Headers
  • 1 x USB 3.0 Header
  • 1 x Dr. Debug with LED
  • 1 x Power Switch with LED
  • 1 x Reset Switch with LED
  • 1 x BIOS Selection Switch
Extrenal Connectors
  • 1 x PS/2 Mous/Keayboard Port
  • 1 x Optical SPDIF Out Port
  • 1 x eSATA Connector
  • 4 x USB 2.0 Ports
  • 4 x USB 3.0 Ports
  • 2 x RJ-45 LAND Ports
  • 1 x Clear CMOS
  • HD Audio Jacks: Rear Speaker / Central / Bass / Line in / Front Speaker / Microphone
Forfactor EATX (30.5 cm x 33.0 cm)


   





Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Features

12 + 4 Phase Power Design

Since quite some time ASRock has been equipping its boards with digital power designs. With the X99 WS they are very proud about their quite complex solution which consists of Dual-Stack MOSFET's (DSM), NextFET MOSFETs and 12K Platinum caps.

 

Purity Sound 2

The ASRock Purity 2 audio solution is based on a Realtek ALC1150 audio codec and features 115dB SNR. It also comes with EMI shielding for the main chip as well as onboard isolation. In order to improve signal quality, the motherboard features excellent Nichicon onboard capacitors.
 

M.2 Support

The new X99 WS motherboard from ASRock features an M.2 slot which is placed between two PCIe slots. This motherboard can be equipped with SSDs in M.2 format and it is wired directly to the X99 PCH via four PCI Express lanes, therefore offering up to 20 Gbps can be pushed over the bus through this slot.


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Layout

At a first glance the ASRock X99 WS leaves a very good impression with its good looking design. The manufacturer decided to go for a combination of black and blue, which suites nicely and in the end you get an aesthetic looking product. The layout itself is well thought and there is for example plenty of space around the CPU socket to install even todays largest CPU coolers. The fact that there are SATA connectors which have been angled by 90 degrees allows for an easy installation of oversized graphics cards. Meanwhile ASRock is using very similarly shaped cooling blocks on all motherboards in order to unify the design language. The only thing that gets changed is the color.



The ASRock X99 WS comes with a digital 12+4 phase power design, whereas the CPU is backed up by twelve phases and the memory by four. Like we've already explained on the features page ASRock is making use of an extensive solution. There are for instance Dual-Stack MOSFETs, NexFET MOSFETs as well as 12K Platinum caps on this motherboard. The Dual-Stack MOSFETs are taking care of stable and efficient current delivery to the CPU and compared to standard MOSFETs the offer a significantly lower RDS(on) value of just 1.2 milliohm. The memory gets backed-up by NexFET MOSFETs, which also offer a very low ROD(on) value of 2.9 milliohm. Last but definitely not least there 12K Platinum Caps that are good for no less than 12'000 hours of on time.

Totally you'll find eight DIMM-slots on the ASRock X99 WS. Officially supported are DDR4, 2933+(OC) / 2800(OC) / 2400(OC) / 2133 MHz. There is engough space between the DIMM-slots and the CPU socket which means that you wont encounter compatibility problems with big coolers even when you choose to install RAM with big heatspreaders. Also supported are Xtreme Memory Profiles (XMP) in version 2.0.

On the X99 WS PCH as well as current converters got separate cooling blocks and also the chips in between CPU socket and first PCI Express 3.0 slot received their own cooling element. ASRock decided to connect PCH and the block between CPU socket and first PCI Express 3.0 slot with a heatpipe and also the two blocks covering the VRM area are connected via a heatpipe. Other than that the weight of this board is quite high, which is also partially due to cooling blocks. Subjectively speaking a high weight is a first indicator for a quality motherboard.

  


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Connectors and I/O

Totally ASRock equipped the X99 WS with ten angled SATA ports. All ports offer 6Gbps bandwidth and they've been wired directly to the X99 PCH. There is also a M.2 x4 expansion slot, which has been connected through four PCI Express 2.0 lanes. If you decide to use the M.2 slot you should keep in mind, that the third full-size PCI Express slot will be deactivated. Overall there is good storage flexibility with the motherboard and workstations as well as rigs for enthusiasts can be equipped with plenty of drives. On this PCB you'll also find practical onboard power- and reset-buttons in the top right corner of the board and there is also a debug display.

 

Totally you'll find six fan headers on the ASRock X99 WS which is more than enough, to provide a well equipped high-end system or also a workstation with fresh air. The fan headers are located around the CPU socket as well as spread over the motherboard. Unfortunately not all headers offer 4 pins which means that you can't regulate fan speeds in BIOS or Windows for alle fans attached to the board.

  

Looking at the external connectors directly at the back-panel ASRock equipped the X99 WS with one PS2 mouse/keyboard connector, four USB 3.0/2.0 ports, four USB 2.0/1.1 ports, two gigabit ethernet ports, an eSATA connector as well as an optical out and an analogue audio panel. Furtheremore you'll also find a clear CMOS button.



Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

BIOS

With the most recent version of ASRock's UEFI BIOS, we find a visually more attractive than what you got with the predecessor, but still we would like it to be less flashy. In terms of functionality you can not only monitor system information, CPU and motherboard temperature, CPU voltage and DRAM status but you can also create your own fan profiles for the different PWM headers.

   


   


   


   


   


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Test setup

Hardware

Motherboard
  • ASRock X99 WS
  • ASUS Rampage V Extreme
  • ASUS X99 Deluxe
  • EVGA X99 Classified
  • Gigabyte X99-UD4
Processor Intel Core i7-5960X, 3.5 GHz
Memory 16 GB (4x4) G.Skill Ripjaws4 DDR4-3000 MHz CL15-15-15-35-Auto @ DDR4-2133 CL14-14-14-35-2T
Graphic card ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti Matrix Platinum
Driver ForceWare 340.52
Hard disk OCZ Arc 100 SSD 240 GB
Power supply Seasonic Platinum 1050W


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Preview / Gallery

Product Picture Link to Gallery
   

ASRock X99 WS

   

ASUS Rampage V Extreme

   

ASUS X99 Deluxe

   

EVGA X99 Classified

   

Gigabyte X99-UD4

   


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

3DMark

Ice Storm

3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Score
Review Rating
Percent
ASUS X99 Deluxe 160'789 102.18 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
159'987 101.67 %
ASRock X99 WS 158'888 100.98 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
158'099 100.47 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
157'365 100.00 %
more is better


Ice Storm Physics

3DMark Ice Storm Physics Score
Review Rating
Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
59'650 102.16 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 59'635 102.13 %
ASRock X99 WS 58'910 100.89 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
59'653 102.16 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
58'389 100.00 %
more is better


Fire Strike

3DMark Fire Strike Score
Review Rating
Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
5'533 100.56 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 5'528 100.47 %
ASRock X99 WS 5'526 100.44 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
5'516 100.25 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
5'502 100.00 %
more is better


Fire Strike Physics

3DMark Fire Strike Physics Score
Review Rating
Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
17'227 104.49 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 17'168 104.13 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
17'100 100.72 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
16'487 100.00 %
ASRock X99 WS 16'453 99.79 %
more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

3DMark 11

3DMark 11 Total
Review Rating
Percent
ASUS X99 Deluxe 15'947 103.61 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
15'922 103.44 %
ASRock X99 WS 15'777 102.50 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
15'652 101.69 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
15'392 100.00 %
more is better


CPU

3DMark 11 Physics
Review Rating
Percent
ASUS X99 Deluxe 15'445 101.27 %
ASRock X99 WS 15'397 100.96 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
15'251 100.00 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
16'329 107.07 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
15'212 99.74 %
more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

3DMark Vantage

3DMark Vantage Total
Review Rating
Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
50'220 102.51 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 50'050 102.17 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
49'756 101.57 %
ASRock X99 WS 49'415 100.87 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
48'988 100.00 %
more is better


3DMark Vantage CPU
Review Rating
Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
51'564 102.61 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 51'363 102.21 %
ASRock X99 WS 50'940 101.37 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
50'899 101.29 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
50'250 100.00 %
more is better



Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

PC Mark 08

Total

PC Mark 08 Total
Review Rating
Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
4'437 103.98 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 4'402 103.16 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
4'390 102.88 %
ASRock X99 WS 4'290 100.54 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
4'267 100.00 %
more is better


Web browsing - JunglePin
Review Rating
s Percent
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
0.262 100.00 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
0.288 90.97 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 0.288 90.97 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
0.288 90.97 %
ASRock X99 WS 0.292 89.73 %
less is better


Web Browsing Amazonia
Review Rating
s Percent
ASUS X99 Deluxe 0.122 100.00 %
ASRock X99 WS 0.122 100.00 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
0.122 100.00 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
0.122 100.00 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
0.122 100.00 %
less is better


Writing
Review Rating
s Percent
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
4.11 106.81 %
ASRock X99 WS 4.27 102.81 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
4.33 101.39 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 4.35 100.92 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
4.39 100.00 %
less is better


Photo Editing
Review Rating
s Percent
ASUS X99 Deluxe 0.283 127.67 %
ASRock X99 WS 0.283 127.67 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
0.282 127.66 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
0.306 117.68 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
0.360 100.00 %
less is better


Video Chat encoding / Video Chat Playback 1
Review Rating
fps Percent
ASUS X99 Deluxe 30.00 100.00 %
ASRock X99 WS 30.00 100.00 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
30.00 100.00 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
30.00 100.00 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
30.00 100.00 %
more is better


Video Chat encoding / Video Chat encoding
Review Rating
ms Percent
ASRock X99 WS 42.00 102.62 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 42.00 102.62 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
42.00 102.62 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
43.00 100.23 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
43.10 106.07 %
less is better


Casual Gaming
Review Rating
fps Percent
ASUS X99 Deluxe 110.1 101.10 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
109.7 100.73 %
ASRock X99 WS 109.3 100.38 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
108.9 100.00 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
108.4 99.54 %
more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Arithmetic Benchmark

SiSoft Sandra - Arithmetic Benchmark - Dhrystone
Review Rating
GIPS Percent
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
241.24 100.31 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 240.80 100.13 %
ASRock X99 WS 240.14 99.85 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
240.49 100.00 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
240.69 99.95 %
more is better


SiSoft Sandra - Arithmetic Benchmark - Whetstone
Review Rating
GFLOPS Percent
ASUS X99 Deluxe 190.28 100.43 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
189.70 100.13 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
189.46 100.00 %
ASRock X99 WS 189.37 99.95 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
186.84 98.66 %
more is better


Multimedia

SiSoft Sandra - Multimedia - Integer
Review Rating
MPixels/sec Percent
ASUS X99 Deluxe 452.13 105.10 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
451.25 104.90 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
442.67 102.90 %
ASRock X99 WS 435.72 101.29 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
430.18 100.00 %
more is better


SiSoft Sandra - Multimedia - Floating Point
Review Rating
MPixels/sec Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
446.67 104.92 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 446.00 104.76 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
428.81 100.72 %
ASRock X99 WS 427.82 100.49 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
425.74 100.00 %
more is better


Crytography

SiSoft Sandra - Crytography - AES 256
Review Rating
GB/sec Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
14.45 105.24 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 14.44 105.17 %
ASRock X99 WS 14.25 103.79 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
13.73 100.00 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
13.50 98.18 %
more is better


SiSoft Sandra - Crytography - SHA 256
Review Rating
GB/sec Percent
ASUS X99 Deluxe 9.26 100.32 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
9.25 100.22 %
ASRock X99 WS 9.25 100.22 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
9.23 100.00 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
9.18 98.59 %
more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

SiSoft Sandra 2

Memory bandwidth

SiSoft Sandra - Memory bandwidth - Integer
Review Rating
GB/sec Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
46.61 104.74 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 46.59 104.70 %
ASRock X99 WS 46.52 104.54 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
44.50 100.00 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
43.23 97.15 %
more is better


SiSoft Sandra - Memory bandwidth - floating point
Review Rating
GB/sec Percent
ASUS X99 Deluxe 47.68 105.96 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
47.20 104.89 %
ASRock X99 WS 47.15 104.78 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
45.69 101.53 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
45.00 100.00 %
more is better


Memory latency

SiSoft Sandra - Memory latency
Review Rating
ns Percent
ASRock X99 WS 27.4 100.00 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
27.4 100.00 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 27.7 98.92 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
27.8 96.56 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
30.0 91.33 %
less is better more is better


Memory and cache access

SiSoft Sandra - Memory and cache access
Review Rating
GB/sec Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
351.65 104.79 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 351.58 104.77 %
ASRock X99 WS 341.54 101.78 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
336.21 100.19 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
335.56 100.00 %
more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

UC Bench

UC Bench
Review Rating
PW/sec Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
1801.8 102.41 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 1801.2 102.38 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
1798.3 102.21 %
ASRock X99 WS 1764.9 100.31 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
1759.4 100.00 %
more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Super Pi 1M - 32M

Super Pi 1M

SuperPi 1.5 XS - 1M
Review Rating
sec Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
10.250 102.87 %
ASRock X99 WS 10.389 101.49 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
10.410 101.29 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 10.431 101.08 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
10.544 100.00 %
less is better more is better

Super Pi 32M

SuperPi 1.5 XS - 32M
Review Rating
sec Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
541'812 100.65 %
ASRock X99 WS 542.320 100.55 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 542'437 100.53 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
545'313 100.00 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
553.569 98.51 %
less is better more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

wPrime 1024M Multicore

wPrime - 1024M Multi Core
Review Rating
sec Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
103'999 102.46 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 104'047 102.41 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
104.506 101.96 %
ASRock X99 WS 104.555 101.91 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
106'554 100.00 %
less is better more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Cinebench R15

Cinebench R11.5 - Multi Core

Cinebench R15 - Multi Core
Review Rating
pts Percent
ASUS X99 Deluxe 1'402 105.33 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
1'396 104.88 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
1'381 103.76 %
ASRock X99 WS 1'339 100.60 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
1'331 100.00 %
less is better more is better



Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Tomb Raider

Low resolution, low details

Tomb Raider (low resolution, low details)
Review Rating
fps Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
724.30 101.09 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 723.00 100.91 %
ASRock X99 WS 718.60 100.29 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
716.50 100.00 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
689.80 96.27 %
more is better


High resolution, high details

Tomb Raider (high resolution, high details)
Review Rating
fps Percent
ASRock X99 WS 52.3 100.38 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
52.3 100.38 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 52.2 100.19 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
52.1 100.00 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
52.0 99.81 %
more is better



Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Metro Last Light

Low resolution, low details

Metro Last Light (low details, low resolution)
Review Rating
fps Percent
ASRock X99 WS 202.81 101.28 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 202.12 100.93 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
201.98 100.86 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
200.25 100.00 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
199.98 99.87 %
more is better


High resolution, high details

Metro Last Light (high details, high resolution)
Review Rating
fps Percent
ASUS X99 Deluxe 64.93 100.51 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
64.88 100.43 %
ASRock X99 WS 64.85 100.39 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
64.60 100.00 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
64.57 99.95 %
more is better



Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Thief

Low resolution, low details

Thief (low details, low resolution)
Review Rating
fps Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
138.4 103.51 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 138.3 103.44 %
ASRock X99 WS 135.1 101.08 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
134.5 100.60 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
133.7 100.00 %
more is better


High resolution, high details

Thief (high details, high resolution)
Review Rating
fps Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
84.4 102.55 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 83.1 100.97 %
ASRock X99 WS 82.6 100.36 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
82.4 100.12 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
82.3 100.00 %
more is better



Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Right Mark Audio Analyzer

Frequency Response
Review Rating
  Overall
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
+0.26, +0.12 Excellent
ASUS X99 Deluxe +0.44, +0.06 Very good
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
+0.20, +0.12 Good
ASRock X99 WS +0.50, +0.09 Good
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
+.047, -1.51 Average
less is better  


Noise Level, dB (A)
Review Rating
  Overall
ASUS X99 Deluxe -94.6 Very good
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
-90.2 Very good
ASRock X99 WS -88.9 Good
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
-84.8 Good
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
-84.6 Good
less is better more is better


Dynamic Range
Review Rating
  Overall
ASUS X99 Deluxe 94.4 Very good
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
90.2 Very good
ASRock X99 WS 88.8 Good
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
84.7 Good
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
84.5 Good
more is better  


Total Harmonic Distortion (THD)
Review Rating
  Overall
ASUS X99 Deluxe 6.169 Very good
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
0.019 Good
ASRock X99 WS 0.212 Poor
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
2.899 Very poor
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
23.919 Very poor
less is better  


THD + Noise
Review Rating
  Overall
ASUS X99 Deluxe -21.9 Very good
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
-71.3 Average
ASRock X99 WS -48.2 Poor
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
-28.8 Very poor
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
-9.9 Very poor
less is better  


IMD + Noise
Review Rating
  Overall
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
0.026 Good
ASRock X99 WS 0.429 Poor
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
1.115 Poor
ASUS X99 Deluxe 3.710 Poor
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
21.186 Very poor
less is better  


Stereo Crosstalk
Review Rating
  Overall
ASUS X99 Deluxe -92.4 Exellent
ASRock X99 WS -85.8 Exellent
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
-83.7 Very good
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
-83.9 Very good
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
-83.1 Very good
less is better  


IMD at 10kHz
Review Rating
  Overall
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
0.020 Very good
ASRock X99 WS 0.453 Poor
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
1.176 Poor
ASUS X99 Deluxe 3.089 Poor
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
24.226 Very poor
less is better  


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  

[pagebreak]

BCLK Overclocking[frBCLK Overclocking[/fr]

Idle

Idle
Review Rating
MHz Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
179 105.29 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 178 104.71 %
ASRock X99 WS 176 103.53 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
175 102.94 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
170 100.00 %
less is better more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Power Consumption

Idle

Idle
Review Rating
Watt Percent
ASRock X99 WS 81.15 127.11 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
81.60 126.41 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 91.40 112.86 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
103.15 100.00 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
105.14 98.11 %
less is better more is better


Load

Load
Review Rating
Watt Percent
ASUS X99 Deluxe 178.20 106.99 %
ASRock X99 WS 179.75 106.97 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
186.77 102.08 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
190.65 100.00 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
202.67 94.07 %
less is better more is better



Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Performance Rating

3D and Gaming Benchmarks
Review Rating
Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
102.38 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 101.85 %
ASRock X99 WS 100.83 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
100.32 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
100.00 %
more is better


2D Benchmarks
Review Rating
Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
103.06 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 102.98 %
ASRock X99 WS 101.97 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
100.95 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
100.00 %
more is better


Performance per Watt
Review Rating
Percent
ASRock X99 WS 86.64 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
88.09 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 93.18 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
100.00 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
106.93 %
less is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Price comparison

Model
Geizhals.eu
ASUS X99 Deluxe
ASRock X99 WS
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
EVGA X99 Classified
Gigabyte X99 SOC Force
Gigabyte X99 UD4



Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Conclusion

Allgemein   + -
With the X99 WS ASRock has a solid motherboard in it's portfolio, which is based on Intels latest X99 chipset. Having a closer look at the features mix reveals there have quite a few reasonable choices been made. Which is why here and there you see that ASRock has actually been holding back installing another and yet another additional chip. Nevertheless we would have liked to find a few more USB 3.0 ports at the back panel for example. On another note there are no SATA Express ports on this board. These days there are virtually no SATA Express devices available, which can be seen as a justification for not equipping the board with such ports.   - Design
- Layout
 
       
Layout   + -

The ASRock X99 WS's layout has been very well thought. Once more practical are the angled SATA connectors as well as the power- and reset-buttons. There is also a debug display which is very useful in case you should have issues with a component in your system or the board itself. Apart from that the placement of the PCI-Express x16 slots is very well chosen. There is a total of five full sized PCI Express slots and between the first two PCI Express x16 slots there is a M.2 x4 slot. Should you want to do that, you can go ahead and build a quad-GPU system using this board as a basis.

  - Angled SATA connectors - 5 x Full-Size PCI Express x16
- Power/Reset-Button onboard
- Debug display
- Space around the CPU socket - M.2 x4
- No SATA Express
       
Performance   + -
Let's have closer look at overall 3D performance. Calcualting the average of all 3D benchmarks we ran, we see that this board comes in third. Concerning the average of all 2D benchmarks we ran, this board again reaches third position. At this point we're quite sure, ASRock is capable of getting some more performance out of this motherboard and we're looking forward to finding BIOS updates on ASRocks files servers. On another note we had a look at power consumption and it turns out that this board is quite a bit more power efficient than the competition.   - Power consumption - 3DMark Fire Strike Physics
       
Overclocking / BIOS   + -
The BIOS of the X99 WS is identical from what you get with other recent ASRock motherboards these days. This means the basic structure and also the design has not been changed apart from the color scheme. Overall the structure is easy to understand and even if you're not a very experienced user you will find the things you'd like to change. On another note it's always interesting to see how mature a BIOS is before a prodcut launch. ASRock did a pretty good job with this on but still, every here and there the performance could be improved.   - Clear arrangement - Sheer amount of options  
       
Recommendation   + -
The ASRock X99 WS is most certainly going to be one of the more affordable X99 motherboards. So far we only find this model listed at Caseking for a price of 295 Euro. We're quite sure the prices will drop by quite a margin during the first weeks after launch and in that case this will be a very reasonable choice. Should you be looking for a new X99 motherboard for your workstation, considering the X99 WS from ASRock is definitely no mistake.   - Workstation
- Enthusiast
 
       
Rating
We give the ASRock X99 WS very good 4.5 out of 5 stars.





Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  


Author: m.buechel@ocaholic.ch