ASUS P8Z68-V Pro Review
Category : Z68
Published by Marc Büchel on 07.06.11
The P8Z68-V Pro from ASUS supports Intels brand new Z68 chipset which supports Intels Rapid Storage Technology. Furthermore ASUS mad sure that Lucids Virtu is being supported which allows dynamic load sharing between the integrate and a discrete graphics. Intel Rapid Storage Technology is an intelligent caching solution which is able to enhand the performance of a system hard drive using a small SSD with up to 32 GByte capacity. In the end this should speed up overall system performance and allow a smoother user experience. If the ASUS P8Z68-V Pro is a solid overall product, that's what we're going to show you on the following pages.





The P8Z68-VPro will be ASUS' high end motherboard regarding Intels upcoming Z68 chipset. Therefore we're really curious what they've done from the layout and design perspective.

Page 1 - Introduction Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 9 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Layout Page 10 - Super Pi / wPrime
Page 4 - Connectors and I/O Page 11 - Games
Page 5 - BIOS Page 12 - Overclocking
Page 6 - Test setup Page 13 - Conclusion
Page 7 - Futuremark  



Discuss this article in the forums

[pagebreak]

Spezifikationen / Lieferumfang

CPU Intel Socket 1155 Core i7, Core i5, Core i3
Chipset Intel Z68
Memory Dual Channel DDR3, 4 x DIMM, Max. 32 GB DDR3, 2200 OC / 2133 OC / 1866 / 1600 / 1333 / 1066 Non-ECC,Un-buffered
Multi-GPU ATI CrossFireX
NVIDIA SLI
Slots 2 x PCI-Express x16 (single at x16, dual at x8/x8 mode)
1 x PCI-Express x16 (at x4 mode, compatible with PCIe x1 and x4 devices)
2 x PCI-Express 2.0 x1
2 x PCI
Sound Realtek ALC892 8-Channel HD Audio Codec
Storage 4 x SATA 6.0 Gb/s (RAID 0, 1, 5, 0+1)
4 x SATA 3.0 Gb/s  (RAID 0, 1, 5, 0+1, JBOD)
1 x eSATA 3.0 Gb/s
Bluetooth Bluetooth v 2.1 + EDR, ASUS BT GO! Utility
LAN 1 x Gigabit LAN
Firewire 2 x 1394a ports (2 via motherboard header)
USB 4 x USB 3.0/2.0 (2 via back panel, 2 via front panel)
12 x USB 2.0/1.1 Connectors (8 via back panel, 4 via motherboard header)
Fan connectors 6 header
Forfactor ATX (30.5cm x 24.4cm)
BIOS Bios (2 x 32 Mb flash ROM, EFI AMI BIOS)




Regarding the delivery you'll find everything you need. Under certain circumstances you might wish there was an additional SLI or CrossFire bridge in the delivery but the fact that this is an aggressively priced product makes it understandable why they didn't do that.


Features

EPU If you activate the EPU this chip monitors all possible voltages and clock speeds and automatically sets them to guarantee an energy efficient operation of you system.
   
TPU As soon as one activates the TPU this chips monitors all possible voltages and clock speeds using the according software. The difference to the EPU is that TPU will provide as much performance as possible. Therefore it can increase clock speeds and voltages.
   
Digital Power Design Meanwhile ASUS also provides its boards with digital power designs. Using the the right software, in this case ASUS DIGI+ VRM Utility it is not only possible to adjust voltages whilst being in Windows on can now also control impedances.
   
BT GO! BT GO! can be classified as a very typical gadget using which it is possbile to for example remote control your PC via your mobile phone. There is also some functionality to synchronize folders in fact one can do quite a lot using BT GO!
   
Lucid Virtu All the new P8Z-series motherboards from ASUS support Lucids Virtu software. Using which makes a dynamic load balancing between the integrated graphics and a discrete graphics card possible. The software in this case can for example deactivate the discrete graphics card and only use the integrated graphics from the CPU. This makes sense when applications only need 2D compute power. Another example would be a 3D application where Virtu dynamically assigns load to either both the integrated as well as discrete graphics in order to maximize performance.
   
Intel Smart Response Technology Intels Z68 chipset allows to use a small SSD as a cache for a big hard drive in order to enhance overall system performance. Especially application and system starts are ment to benefit from this technology. Also the overall user experience should become smoother. Of course you shouldn't expect a setup which makes use of Intels Smart Response Technology to outperform a SSD as a system drive.


Page 1 - Introduction Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 9 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Layout Page 10 - Super Pi / wPrime
Page 4 - Connectors and I/O Page 11 - Games
Page 5 - BIOS Page 12 - Overclocking
Page 6 - Test setup Page 13 - Conclusion
Page 7 - Futuremark  



Discuss this article in the forums

[pagebreak]

Layout

Already at a first glance the ASUS P8Z68-VPro looks very good with it harmonic design. The colors look suite nicely and the different blue tones on a black PCB are calming. The layout itself is well thought and there is for example plenty of space around the CPU socket to install even todays largest CPU coolers.


ASUS provided the P8Z68-VPro with a 16+2 phase current supply whereas the CPU can rely on 16 phases and the memory gets its own two phases. Furthermore ASUS implemented a digital power design which should emit less electromagnetic radiation than its analogue counterpart. Therefore ASUS claims that the system stability can be enhanced even further, especially during extreme overclocking.


Totally you'll find four DIMM-slots on the P8Z68-VPro. Officially supported are DDR3-2200+ / 2133 / 1866 / 1600 / 1333 / 1066 with up to 32 GByte capacity. The DIMM-slots are quite close to the CPU socket which might cause some compatibility problems with big coolers especially when you choose to install RAM with big heatspreaders.


Northbridge, Southbridge as well as the current converters are being held at adequate temperatures via a passive heatpipe cooling solution. The aluminium blocks around the CPU socket are quite big. In fact they are that big that installing big CPU coolers might not be possible in some cases depending on the coolers clamping mechanism.

  


Page 1 - Introduction Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 9 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Layout Page 10 - Super Pi / wPrime
Page 4 - Connectors and I/O Page 11 - Games
Page 5 - BIOS Page 12 - Overclocking
Page 6 - Test setup Page 13 - Conclusion
Page 7 - Futuremark  



Discuss this article in the forums

[pagebreak]

Anschlüsse und I/O

Totally ASUS provided the P8Z68-VPro with eight angled SATA ports which should be enough for any office PC or gaming system. You'll also find practical onboard power- and reset-buttons. Ufortunately you wont find a debug display which would be very useful if you should once have issues with one of the components in your system. 

  

Totally you'll find six fan header on the P8Z68-VPro which is more than enough, to provide a well equipped midrange or high-end-system with fresh air. The fanheaders are located around the CPU socket as well as at the bottom edge of the mainboard.

  

Looking at the external connectors directly at the back-panel ASUS provided the P8Z68-VPro with six USB 2.0/1.1 ports, a firewire port, one eSATA ports, a bluetooth transmitter/receiver, one gigabit ethernet port, a optical out as well as an analogue audio panel and an HDMI, a DVI and a VGA port.



Page 1 - Introduction Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 9 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Layout Page 10 - Super Pi / wPrime
Page 4 - Connectors and I/O Page 11 - Games
Page 5 - BIOS Page 12 - Overclocking
Page 6 - Test setup Page 13 - Conclusion
Page 7 - Futuremark  



Discuss this article in the forums

[pagebreak]

BIOS

Following you find BIOS-screens regarding basic configuration options as well as overclocking. Nearly standard these days is the possibility to save and load BIOS-Profiles.
  


  


  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 


Page 1 - Introduction Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 9 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Layout Page 10 - Super Pi / wPrime
Page 4 - Connectors and I/O Page 11 - Games
Page 5 - BIOS Page 12 - Overclocking
Page 6 - Test setup Page 13 - Conclusion
Page 7 - Futuremark  



Discuss this article in the forums

[pagebreak]

Test setup

Hardware

Motherboard - ASUS P8Z68-V Pro
- ASUS P8H67-M Evo
- ASRock
Fatal1ty P67 Professional
-
ASUS P8H67-I Deluxe
- Intel DH67BL
- Intel DP67BG
- MSI P67A-GD65
- MSI Big Bang Marshal P67
-
ASUS Sabertooth P67
- Gigabyte P67A-UD4

- ASUS Maximus IV Extreme
- ASUS P8P67 WS Revolution
- ASUS P8P67-M EVO
- Gigabyte P67A-UD7
Processor Intel Core i5 2500K
Memory 2 GB Kingston PC3 16'000 9-9-9-27
Graphic card Asus 5850
Hard disk Samsung Spinpoint F1 320 GByte
Power supply bequiet! Dark Power Pro 1000Watt


Page 1 - Introduction Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 9 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Layout Page 10 - Super Pi / wPrime
Page 4 - Connectors and I/O Page 11 - Games
Page 5 - BIOS Page 12 - Overclocking
Page 6 - Test setup Page 13 - Conclusion
Page 7 - Futuremark  



Discuss this article in the forums

[pagebreak]

Futuremark

3DMark11

3DMark 11 is Futuremarks latest benchmark for the entire graphical subsystem. The benchmark uses DirectX 11 and it supports all recent features which can possibly generate high load on a GPU. Therefore you find tessellation, compute shader calculations, divers lighting effects and different depth of filed animations. Following we publish values regarding the performance preset of 3DMark 11.

Total

3DMark 11 Total   Percent
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro 3'719 101.00 %
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional 3'714 100.87 %
ASUS Sabertooth P67 3'709 100.73 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD4 3'709 100.73 %
Asus Maximus IV Extreme 3'709 100.73 %
MSI P67A-GD65 3'707 100.68 %
ASUS P8H67-M Evo 3'707 100.68 %
Asus P8P67-M EVO 3'705 100.62 %
Intel mATX DH67BL 3'704 100.60 %
ASUS P8H67-I Deluxe 3'702 100.54 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD7 3'688 100.16 %
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution 3'682 100.00 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro (with Lucid Virtu) 3'678 99.89 %
MSI Big Bang Marshal P67 3'632 98.64 %
Intel DP67BG 3'620 98.32 %
  more is better


Physic

3DMark 11 Physic Score   Percent
Gigabyte P67A-UD7 6'461 102.65 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro 6'421 102.02 %
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional 6'399 101.67 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro (with Lucid Virtu) 6'317 100.37 %
Asus Maximus IV Extreme 6'300 100.10 %
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution 6'294 100.00 %
Intel DP67BG 6'274 99.68 %
ASUS Sabertooth P67 6'271 99.73 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD4 6'269 99.60 %
MSI Big Bang Marshal P67 6'268 99 59 %
MSI P67A-GD65 6'244 99.21 %
ASUS P8H67-M Evo 6'201 98.52 %
Asus P8P67-M EVO 6'188 98.32 %
Intel mATX DH67BL 6'193 98.40 %
ASUS P8H67-I Deluxe 6'142 97.59 %
  more is better


3DMark Vantage

3DMark Vantage is able to squeeze nearly everything out of a recent system. Therefore the feature liste is also pretty long: DirectX10, FP16-HDR, motion blur, parallax occlusion mapping, GPU-physics simulation and different shader effects are being used to even make recent high-end systems struggle.

Total

3DMark Vantage Total   Percent
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional 16'153 103.90 %
ASUS P8H67-I Deluxe 16'107 103.61 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro 16'075 103.40 %
ASUS P8H67-M Evo 16'069 103.36 %
Intel DP67BG 15'924 102.43 %
MSI P67A-GD65 15'835 101.86 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD4 15'776 101.48 %
Intel mATX DH67BL 15'710 101.05 %
Asus Maximus IV Extreme 15'760 101.38 %
ASUS Sabertooth P67 15'757 101.36 %
Asus P8P67-M EVO 15'749 101.31 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD7 15'605 100.38 %
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution 15'546 100.00 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro (with Lucid Virtu) 15'485 99.61 %
MSI Big Bang Marshal P67 15'157 97.50 %
  more is better


CPU

3DMark Vantage CPU   Percent
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional 17'379 101.35 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD7 17'354 101.21 %
MSI P67A-GD65 17'186 100.23 %
ASUS Sabertooth P67 17'179 100.19 %
Asus Maximus IV Extreme 17'164 100.10 %
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution 17'147 100.00 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro 17'126 99.88 %
Intel DP67BG 17'121 99.85 %
MSI Big Bang Marshal P67 17'118 99.83 %
ASUS P8H67-M Evo 17'101 99.73 %
ASUS P8H67-I Deluxe 17'043 99.39 %
Asus P8P67-M EVO 17'017 99.24 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD4 16'979 99.02 %
Intel mATX DH67BL 16'873 98.40 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro (with Lucid Virtu) 15'055 87.80 %
  more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 9 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Layout Page 10 - Super Pi / wPrime
Page 4 - Connectors and I/O Page 11 - Games
Page 5 - BIOS Page 12 - Overclocking
Page 6 - Test setup Page 13 - Conclusion
Page 7 - Futuremark  



Discuss this article in the forums

[pagebreak]

SiSoft Sandra 1

SiSoft Sandra is a theoretical multi purpose benchmark suite which is able to show differences in CPU architectures. We split the tests with SiSoft Sandra into two parts. Therefore on this page you'll find Arithmetic-, Multimedia- and Cryptography-benchmarks.

Arithmetic Benchmark

SiSoft Sandra - Arithmetic Benchmark - Drystone GIPS Percent
ASUS P8H67-I Deluxe 68.00 101.12 %
ASUS P8H67-M Evo 67.83 100.86 %
Asus Maximus IV Extreme 67.77 100.77 %
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional 67.67 100.62 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD4 67.62 100.55 %
Intel DP67BG 67.60 100.52 %
MSI Big Bang Marshal P67 67.59 100.51 %
Asus P8P67-M EVO 67.37 100.18 %
Intel mATX DH67BL 67.25 100.00 %
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution 67.25 100.00 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro 67.19 99.91 %
ASUS Sabertooth P67 67.13 99.82 %
MSI P67A-GD65 67.00 99.63 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD7 67.00 99.63 %
  more is better


SiSoft Sandra - Arithmetic Benchmark - Whetstone GFLOPS Percent
ASUS Sabertooth P67 49.00 100.51 %
Asus P8P67-M EVO 49.00 100.51 %
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional 48.81 100.12 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD4 48.80 100.10 %
MSI P67A-GD65 48.80 100.10 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD7 48.78 100.06 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro 48.76 100.02 %
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution 48.75 100.00 %
Intel mATX DH67BL 48.71 99.92 %
Intel DP67BG 48.70 99.90 %
MSI Big Bang Marshal P67 48.69 99.88 %
ASUS P8H67-M Evo 48.43 99.34 %
Asus Maximus IV Extreme 47.77 97.99 %
ASUS P8H67-I Deluxe 47.52 97.48 %
  more is better


Multimedia

SiSoft Sandra - Multimedia - Integer MPixels/sec Percent
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution 120.43 100.00 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro 120.41 99.98 %
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional 120.41 99.98 %
ASUS Sabertooth P67 120.34 99.93 %
Asus P8P67-M EVO 120.34 99.93 %
Asus Maximus IV Extreme 120.33 99.92 %
ASUS P8H67-I Deluxe 120.30 99.89 %
Intel DP67BG 120.23 99.83 %
MSI P67A-GD65 120.19 99.80 %
ASUS P8H67-M Evo 120.10 99.73 %
Intel mATX DH67BL 120.00 99.64 %
MSI Big Bang Marshal P67 120.00 99.64 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD4 120.00 99.64 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD7 120.00 99.64 %
  more is better


SiSoft Sandra - Multimedia - floating point MPixels/sec Percent
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution 71.21 100.00 %
ASUS P8H67-M Evo 71.20 99.99 %
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional 71.20 99.99 %
ASUS P8H67-I Deluxe 71.19 99.97 %
Asus Maximus IV Extreme 71.18 99.96 %
ASUS Sabertooth P67 71.17 99.94 %
Asus P8P67-M EVO 71.16 99.93 %
Intel mATX DH67BL 71.00 99.71 %
MSI P67A-GD65 71.00 99.71 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD4 71.00 99.71 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD7 71.00 99.71 %
MSI Big Bang Marshal P67 70.87 99.52 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro 70.65 99.21 %
Intel DP67BG 70.57 99.10 %
  more is better


Crytography

SiSoft Sandra - Crytography GB/sec Percent
Asus Maximus IV Extreme 7.38 117.14 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD7 7.30 115.87 %
Intel DP67BG 7.00 111.11 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro 6.87 109.05 %
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional 6.85 108.73 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD4 6.30 100.00 %
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution 6.30 100.00 %
ASUS Sabertooth P67 6.30 100.00 %
MSI Big Bang Marshal P67 6.26 99.37 %
MSI P67A-GD65 6.25 99.21 %
Asus P8P67-M EVO 6.00 95.24 %
ASUS P8H67-I Deluxe 5.78 91.75 %
Intel mATX DH67BL 5.74 91.11 %
ASUS P8H67-M Evo 5.70 90.48 %
  more is better


SiSoft Sandra - Crytography - SHA 256 MB/sec Percent
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro 550 101.48 %
ASUS Sabertooth P67 550 101.48 %
Asus Maximus IV Extreme 550 101.48 %
Asus P8P67-M EVO 550 101.48 %
ASUS P8H67-M Evo 550 101.48 %
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional 550 101.48 %
MSI P67A-GD65 549 101.29 %
Intel DP67BG 549 101.29 %
MSI Big Bang Marshal P67 549 101.29 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD4 549 101.29 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD7 549 101.29 %
Intel mATX DH67BL 548 101.11 %
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution 542 100.00 %
ASUS P8H67-I Deluxe 510 94.10 %
  more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 9 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Layout Page 10 - Super Pi / wPrime
Page 4 - Connectors and I/O Page 11 - Games
Page 5 - BIOS Page 12 - Overclocking
Page 6 - Test setup Page 13 - Conclusion
Page 7 - Futuremark  



Discuss this article in the forums

[pagebreak]

SiSoft Sandra 2

At this point we deliver the values regarding Memory Bandwidth, Memory Latency as well as Memory and Cache Access.

Memory bandwidth

SiSoft Sandra - Memory bandwidth - Integer GB/sec Percent
Asus Maximus IV Extreme 22.68 117.63 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD7 22.40 116.18 %
Intel DP67BG 21.46 111.31 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro 21.27 110.32 %
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional 21.13 109.60 %
ASUS Sabertooth P67 19.36 100.41 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD4 19.30 100.10 %
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution 19.28 100.00 %
MSI P67A-GD65 19.22 99.69 %
MSI Big Bang Marshal P67 19.16 99.38 %
Asus P8P67-M EVO 18.84 97.72 %
ASUS P8H67-I Deluxe 18.00 93.36 %
Intel mATX DH67BL 17.75 92.06 %
ASUS P8H67-M Evo 17.70 91.80 %
  more is better


SiSoft Sandra - Memory bandwidth - floating point GB/sec Percent
Asus Maximus IV Extreme 22.69 117.81 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD7 22.40 116.30 %
Intel DP67BG 21.47 111.47 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro 21.25 110.33 %
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional 21.14 109.76 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD4 19.36 100.52 %
ASUS Sabertooth P67 19.35 100.47 %
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution 19.26 100.00 %
MSI P67A-GD65 19.22 99.79 %
MSI Big Bang Marshal P67 19.20 99.69 %
Asus P8P67-M EVO 18.83 97.77 %
Intel mATX DH67BL 17.75 92.16 %
ASUS P8H67-I Deluxe 18.00 93.46 %
ASUS P8H67-M Evo 17.72 92.00 %
  more is better


Memory latency

SiSoft Sandra - Memory latency ns Percent
Asus Maximus IV Extreme 59.0 90.91 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD7 59.3 91.37 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro 64.7 99.69 %
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional 63.5 97.84 %
Intel DP67BG 64.5 99.38 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD4 64.9 100.00 %
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution 64.9 100.00 %
ASUS Sabertooth P67 65.1 100.31 %
MSI P67A-GD65 65.2 100.46 %
MSI Big Bang Marshal P67 65.3 100.62 %
Asus P8P67-M EVO 68.9 106.16 %
ASUS P8H67-I Deluxe 70.8 109.09 %
ASUS P8H67-M Evo 73.0 112.48 %
Intel mATX DH67BL 73.3 112.94 %
  less is better


Memory and cache access

SiSoft Sandra - Memory and cache access GB/sec Percent
Intel DP67BG 102.44 107.01 %
Asus Maximus IV Extreme 102.20 106.76 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro 101.65 106.18 %
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional 101.60 106.13 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD7 101.50 106.03 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD4 96.00 100.28 %
ASUS P8H67-M Evo 96.64 100.95 %
ASUS Sabertooth P67 96.00 100.28 %
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution 95.73 100.00 %
MSI P67A-GD65 95.62 99.89 %
ASUS P8H67-I Deluxe 95.00 99.24 %
MSI Big Bang Marshal P67 95.31 99.56 %
Intel mATX DH67BL 94.45 98.66 %
Asus P8P67-M EVO 93.45 97.62%
  more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 9 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Layout Page 10 - Super Pi / wPrime
Page 4 - Connectors and I/O Page 11 - Games
Page 5 - BIOS Page 12 - Overclocking
Page 6 - Test setup Page 13 - Conclusion
Page 7 - Futuremark  



Discuss this article in the forums

[pagebreak]

Super Pi 1M - 32M / wPrime 32M

Meanwhile Super Pi even in its latest version has become pretty old. Never the less it is able to show scaling to the clock speed nicely.

Super Pi 1M

Super Pi 1.5 XS - 1M sec Percent
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution 11.325 100.00 %
Asus Maximus IV Extreme 11.341 100.14 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro 11.341 100.14 %
ASUS P8H67-I Deluxe 11.341 100.14 %
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional 11.347 100.19 %
ASUS P8H67-M Evo 11.356 100.27 %
MSI Big Bang Marshal P67 11.356 100.27 %
Asus P8P67-M EVO 11.357 100.28 %
ASUS Sabertooth P67 11.372 100.42 %
Intel DP67BG 11.373 100.42 %
MSI P67A-GD65 11.404 100.70 %
Intel mATX DH67BL 11.404 100.70 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD4 11.435 100.97 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD7 11.466 101.25 %
  less is better
 

Super Pi 32M

Super Pi 1.5 XS - 32M sec Percent
Asus Maximus IV Extreme 606.295 97.40 %
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional 607.120 97.53 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD7 609.992 97.99 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro 613.299 98.53 %
Intel DP67BG 615.530 98.89 %
ASUS P8H67-I Deluxe 623.877 98.88 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD4 620.803 99.73 %
ASUS P8H67-M Evo 620.928 99.75 %
ASUS Sabertooth P67 621.552 99.85 %
MSI P67A-GD65 621.942 99.91 %
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution 622.473 100.00 %
Intel mATX DH67BL 623.002 100.08 %
Asus P8P67-M EVO 623.143 100.11 %
MSI Big Bang Marshal P67 623.549 100.17 %
  less is better



wPrime 32M

wPrime is based on a multithreaded algorithm to calculate the square root to up to 32 billion digits. Therefore it is possible to put 100 percent load on every core or thread and to see differences between architectures.

wPrime - 32M sec Percent
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution 9.263 100.00 %
Asus Maximus IV Extreme 9.264 100.01 %
ASUS Sabertooth P67 9.268 100.05 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD4 9.280 100.18 %
MSI P67A-GD65 9.298 100.38 %
Asus P8P67-M EVO 9.298 100.38 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD7 9.314 100.55 %
MSI Big Bang Marshal P67 9.469 102.22 %
Intel DP67BG 9.657 104.25 %
4 9.658 104.26 %
ASUS P8H67-M Evo 9.748 105.24 %
ASUS P8H67-I Deluxe 9.779 105.57 %
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional 9.812 105.93 %
Intel mATX DH67BL 9.953 107.45 %
  less is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 9 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Layout Page 10 - Super Pi / wPrime
Page 4 - Connectors and I/O Page 11 - Games
Page 5 - BIOS Page 12 - Overclocking
Page 6 - Test setup Page 13 - Conclusion
Page 7 - Futuremark  



Discuss this article in the forums

[pagebreak]

Games

Crysis 800 x 600, low details

Crysis is still one of the games which has very high system requirements. Therefore developer Crytek implemented Direct3D-10-API, High-Dynamic-Range-Rendering, Parallax Occlusion Mapping, Soft Shadows, Motion Blur, Depth of Field as well as Soft Particles. We test Crysis by using DirectX9 to show CPU-sacaling especially which low resolutions. If we look at the high resolutions we are able to spot that the CPUs influence compared to the graphic card becomes much less important.

Crysis DirectX9 (800 x 600 low details) fps Percent
Gigabyte P67A-UD7 90.16 104.04 %
Asus Maximus IV Extreme 90.16 104.04 %
MSI Big Bang Marshal P67 89.80 103.62 %
MSI P67A-GD65 89.75 103.57 %
Asus P8P67-M EVO 89.05 102.76 %
ASUS Sabertooth P67 89.01 102.71 %
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution 86.66 100.00 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD4 86.61 99.94 %
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional 84.64 97.67 %
ASUS P8H67-I Deluxe 84.64 97.67 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro 84.26 97.23 %
Intel DP67BG 83.27 96.09 %
ASUS P8H67-M Evo 81.77 94.36 %
Intel mATX DH67BL 81.22 93.72 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro (with Lucid Virtu) 78.94 91.09 %
  more is better


Resident Evil 800 x 600, low details

Resident Evil uses nearly every modern rendering technology: HDR, Hemisphere Lighting, Soft Shadows, Soft Particles, Field- und Motion-Blur oder auch Alpha to Coverage and static Ambient Occlusion. Furthermore Resident Evil 5 has been optimized for multicore architectures and already comes DirectX11 ready. By using the DirectX9 benchmark we can again show CPU-scaling with low resolutions and the compared to the CPU overproportional influence of the graphics card at high resolutions.

Resident Evil DirectX9 (800 x 600 low details) fps Percent
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional 174.8 107.04 %
Asus Maximus IV Extreme 174.5 106.86 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro 173.4 106.18 %
Intel DP67BG 172.6 105.70 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD7 171.6 105.08 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD4 169.5 103.80 %
ASUS P8H67-I Deluxe 169.4 103.74 %
Intel mATX DH67BL 167.3 102.45 %
MSI Big Bang Marshal P67 169.4 103.74 %
ASUS Sabertooth P67 169.3 103.67 %
MSI P67A-GD65 168.5 103.18 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro (with Lucid Virtu) 167.0 102.27 %
ASUS P8H67-M Evo 166.7 102.08 %
Asus P8P67-M EVO 166.5 101.96 %
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution 163.3 100.00 %
  more is better


Street Fighter 4 800 x 600, low details

Street Fighter 4 comes with an extra benchmark version which makes testing you system childrens play. At low resolutions the system requirements are pretty low and we can see CPU-scaling in the results. At high resolution the graphic card becomes more important and the CPUs clock speed has less influence on the fps.

Street Fighter 4 (800 x 600 low details) fps Percent
Asus Maximus IV Extreme 573.97 100.73 %
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution 569.79 100.00 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD7 569.21 99.90 %
ASUS Sabertooth P67 568.30 99.74 %
MSI P67A-GD65 568.25 99.73 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD4 568.00 99.69 %
Asus P8P67-M EVO 567.88 99.66 %
MSI Big Bang Marshal P67 563.66 98.92 %
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional 550.85 96.68 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro 547.15 96.03 %
ASUS P8H67-M Evo 543.94 95.46 %
ASUS P8H67-I Deluxe 543.77 95.43 %
Intel mATX DH67BL 541.17 94.98 %
Intel DP67BG 538.99 94.59 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro (with Lucid Virtu, only integrated graphics active) 163.34 28.67 %
  more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 9 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Layout Page 10 - Super Pi / wPrime
Page 4 - Connectors and I/O Page 11 - Games
Page 5 - BIOS Page 12 - Overclocking
Page 6 - Test setup Page 13 - Conclusion
Page 7 - Futuremark  



Discuss this article in the forums

[pagebreak]

Overclocking

CPU-z MHz Percent
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro 5'200 100.00 %
Asus Maximus IV Extreme 5'200 100.00 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD7 5'200 100.00 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD4 5'200 100.00 %
ASUS Sabertooth P67 5'200 100.00 %
MSI Big Bang Marshal P67 5'200 100.00 %
MSI P67A-GD65 5'200 100.00 %
Intel DP67BG 5'200 100.00 %
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional 4'600 88.46 %
  more is better


Super Pi 1M sec
Intel DP67BG 7.207
Asus Maximus IV Extreme 7.207
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro 7.216
ASUS Sabertooth P67 7.241
MSI Big Bang Marshal P67 7.252
Gigabyte P67A-UD4 7.282
Gigabyte P67A-UD7 7.298
MSI P67A-GD65 7.302
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional 8.128
  less is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 9 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Layout Page 10 - Super Pi / wPrime
Page 4 - Connectors and I/O Page 11 - Games
Page 5 - BIOS Page 12 - Overclocking
Page 6 - Test setup Page 13 - Conclusion
Page 7 - Futuremark  
 

[pagebreak]

Conclusion

Allgemein   + -
At a first glance ASUS leaves a good impression with its P8Z68-VPro. Unfortunately there still are some things which could have been done in a better way. Most importantly there are the cooling blocks which keep the current supply at adequate temperatures. They're simply too big which has the consequence that several high end aircoolers are not compatible with this board. On the other hand the board looks absolutely marvellous. We very much like the color design and to us it very appealing.
At this point we'll also mention some thoughts about Lucids Viru software which comes bundled with this board. Generally the idea behind Virtu is very good. Using the integrated as well as a discrete graphics solution concurrently is a very nice feature. Unfortunately our tests revealed that there is neither a performance gain nor energy savings. Therefore one might doubt the sense this software makes.
The story with Intels Smart Response Technology as quite similar. The idea behind this techology is very interesting but in our opinion it is three years too late. Back then it would have made the transition to SSDs easier or smoother, especially for endusers but these days even the big SSDs are becoming affordable.
  - Design
 
 
       
Layout   + -
Generally the ASUS P8Z68-VPro's Layout has been very well thought. Once more practical are the angled SATA connectors as well as the power- and reset-buttons. Unfortuntately there is no debug display which would have been very useful in case you should have issues with a component in your system or the board itself. Furthermore the placement of the third PCI-Express slot isn't perfect. We would have love to see it as the second last expansion sloat onboard but in with the P8Z68-VPro it is the last and therefore when a dual slot video card is being installed in the last PCI-Express x16 slot it will cover the connectors at the bottom edge of the board. Unfortunately as we already phrased out in the text above there are some issues if you focus on the CPU socket. The aluminium blocks which keep the current converters cool can cause compatibility problems with high end CPU coolers. Another thing is the DIMM slots. They are also very close to the socket. In this case memory which is equipped with big heatspreaders can also collide with big aircoolers.   - Angled SATA connectors
- Power/Reset-Button onboard
- Debug display

 
- Space around CPU socket
- DIMM slots close to the CPU socket
- PCI-Express x16 as last expansion slot
       
Performance   + -
In general this board is an average performer. It is able to show it's muscles in Super Pi but on the other hand during our gaming benchmarks it wasn't able to fully convince. But never the less, from a performance point of view this board leaves a solid impression.
If we look a the performance when Lucid Virtu is activated we see that there is a drop in the single digit percentage range. Therefor the question we've been raising earlier in this review gets some more substance and we don't really understand the point of this software.
  - Super Pi  
       
Overclocking / BIOS   + -
Focussing only on the settings, overclocking definitely isn't something unknown for the P68Z-V Pro. Furthermore we also reached the maximum clock speed of our test CPU, which is 5'200 MHz. Looking at the P68Z-V Pros EFI BIOS we find it well structured. You'll quickly find all the different settings and it also resets itself if you should set values that do not work.   - Well structured BIOS


 

 
       
Recommendation   + -
If you want to build a gaming PC or a well performing desktop rig then the ASUS P8Z68-V Pro will be a safe bet. For a very competitive price you'll get a lot of performance.   - Gaming PC
- Performance Desktop
 

The P8Z68-V Pro can be bought at Digitec to a price of CHF 199.- (est. EUR 153.-).


Page 1 - Introduction Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 9 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Layout Page 10 - Super Pi / wPrime
Page 4 - Connectors and I/O Page 11 - Games
Page 5 - BIOS Page 12 - Overclocking
Page 6 - Test setup Page 13 - Conclusion
Page 7 - Futuremark  


Discuss this article in the forums

Author: m.buechel@ocaholic.ch Copy edited and translated: m.buechel@ocaholic.ch c.ney@ocaholic.ch