Sandy Bridge E: Core i7 3930K and Core i7 3960X
Category : Reviews
Published by Marc Büchel on 14.11.11
Sandy Bridge E, this is the codename of Intels latest CPU generation which is based on an overworked Nehalem microarchitecture. We had the chance to test two of the upcoming CPUs, namely the Core i7-3930K and the Core i7-3960X. Intel claims that the new six core processors are faster than the previous generation of Core i7-9XX CPUs. The new models feautre a quad channel memory interface as well as new SSE Instructions. For us this is reason enough to be very curious if Intel is able to set a new benchmark in the industry.




Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - SuperPi / WPrime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - WinRar
Page 3 - Sandy Bridge CPU / Chipset / Overclocking Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - Resident Evil 5
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Street Fighter 4
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Power consumption
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1  Page 15 - Conclusion
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2  



Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]

Specifications

   


  i7-3960X i7-3930K i7-990X i7 2600K
Codename Sandy Bridge E Sandy Bridge E Nehalem Sandy Bridge
Socket LGA 2011 LGA 2011 LGA 1366 LGA 1155
Manufacturing 32 nm 32 nm 32 nm 32 nm
Transistors 2.27 Billion 2.27 Billion 1.17 Bio 995 Mio
Die-size 435 mm2 435 mm2 248 mm2 265 mm2
Clock 3.30 GHz (3.90 GHz Turbo) 3.20 GHz (Turbo 3.8 GHz) 3.33 GHz 3.40 GHz (3.80 GHz Turbo)
Cores / Threads 6C / 12T 6C / 12T 6C / 12T 4C / 8T
Turbo Yes (2.0) Yes (2.0) Yes (1.0) Yes (2.0)
Bus Speed 100 MHz 100 MHz 133 MHz 100 MHz
Memory DDR3 DDR3 DDR3 DDR3
Memory controller Quad Channel Quad Channel Triple Channel Dual Channel
QPI 6.4 GT/s 6.4 GT/s 6.4 GT/s --
L1 Execution Cache 32 KByte 32 KByte 32 KByte 32 KByte
L1 Data Cache 32 KByte 32 KByte 32 KByte 32 KByte
L2 Cache 256 KByte 256 KByte 256 KByte 256 KByte
L3 Cache 15 MB shared 12 MB shared 12 MB shared 8 MB shared
TDP 130 Watt 130 Watt 130 Watt 95 Watt
C1E technology Yes Yes Yes Yes
Enhanced Intel Speed Step Yes Yes Yes Yes
Virtualisation Vanderpool Vanderpool Vanderpool Vanderpool
Instruction sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3
SSE4.2, AVX, AES, EM64T
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3
SSE4.2, AVX, AES EM64T
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3
SSE4.2, EM64T
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3
SSE4.2, AVX, AES, EM64T


Sandy Bridge E - Line-Up



At launch Intel presents three new Sandy Bridge E CPUs. There is a Core i7-3960X, a Core i7-3930K and a Core i7-3820. The first is the extreme model which comes with 15 Megabyte of shared L3-Cache and an open multiplyer. The K-Model ships with twelve Megabyte of cache and also an open multiplyer. The Core i7-3820 will ship with 10 Megabyte of shared L3-Cache and no open multiplyer. Within most line-ups that have been launched in the past years, Intel did vary with the clock speeds but not with the cache size. It is new that they equip CPUs with more L3-Cache in order to make them slower or faster.

Intels Sandy Bridge E CPUs also ship with a fantastic transistor count of 2.27 billion and they need almost one Billion as L3-Cache. Because Intels communicates the same amount of transistors for every CPU we were thinking if they produce all the news chips in one production line and simply deactivate parts of the L3-Cache on the 3930K and 3820.


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - SuperPi / WPrime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - WinRar
Page 3 - Sandy Bridge CPU / Chipset / Overclocking Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - Resident Evil 5
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Street Fighter 4
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Power consumption
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1  Page 15 - Conclusion
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2  



Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]

Sandy Bridge CPU / GPU / Overclocking

With Sandy Bridge E Intel shows the first major overwork of their Core i7-9XX series CPU architecture. The two CPUs we tested aim at the high-end desktop segment where they can really show what they're capable of. "A bit more of everything" this could have been the motto under which this CPU was developed. Therefore you find more cache, more cores, more threads and a wider memory interface which now offers quad channel, which by the way allows massive throughputs. In other words it looks like Intel took a Sandy Brdige CPU, removed the integrated graphics applied the changes mentioned and volia there it is: Sandy Brdige E.
The new Intel processors also come with Turbo Versino 2.0. When there is load on all core they will automatically be overclocked by 300 MHz and when there's only load on one core the frequency can increase by up to 600 MHz.





The most important change regarding the chipset concerns the 40 PCI-Express 2.0 lanes. If you take a P67 or a Z68 for comparison you'll only find 16 PCI-Express lanes. Especially motherboard manufacturers are excited about this. They're much more flexible now then they were with other chipsets. Furhtermore no additional chips are needed, like for instance the NF200.
With X79 you get a new Socket and a quad channel memory interface. The memory modules standard clock frequency is 1333 MHz and the theoretical throughput is 51.2 Gigabyte per second. For the desktop segment this memory interface is oversized. But having in mind, that the same CPUs will also be used in server setups with more than one CPU on the same motherboard a wide memory interface makes sense. This allows a faster communication between the CPUs.

Already before this launch there were lots of rumors that the new X79 chipset won't ship with native USB3.0 functionality. Finally we can confirm this. Nevertheless there are 14 USB2.0 ports, six SATA-III-Ports but no native USB3.0. Motherboard manufacturers will haven to add USB3.0 themselves be for example adding corresponding chips from ASMEDIA.



Overclocking

Intels high-end desktop chipset doesn't have limitations regardin overclocking. This means that the multiplyer as well as the BCLK can be used for overclocking. This really is good news for the community because being allowed to overclock using both BCLK and multiplyer offers more flexibility to overclockers. Furhtermore the option to overclock the BCLK is a good indicator in order to tell how powerful a boards power design is.




Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - SuperPi / WPrime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - WinRar
Page 3 - Sandy Bridge CPU / Chipset / Overclocking Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - Resident Evil 5
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Street Fighter 4
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Power consumption
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 15 - Conclusion
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2  



Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]

Test setup

Desktop CPUs

Motherboards
  • Intel Socket 2011: ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
  • Intel Socket 1366: ASUS P6T Deluxe
  • Intel Socket 1156: P7P55D-E Premium
  • Intel Socket 1155: Intel DP67BG
  • AMD Socket AM3+: ASUS Crosshair V Formula
  • AMD Socket AM3: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
  • AMD Socket FM1: ASUS F1A75-V Pro
CPUs
  • AMD FX-8150, 3.6 GHz
  • AMD FX-8120, 3.1 GHz
  • AMD A8 38502, 2.90 GHz
  • AMD Phenom II X6 1090T, 3.20 GHz
  • Intel Core i7 3960K, 3.30 GHz
  • Intel Core i7 3930K, 3.20 GHz
  • Intel Core i7 2600K, 3.40 GHz
  • Intel Core i5 2500K, 3.30 GHz
  • Intel Core i7 990 X, 3.46 GHz
  • Intel Core i7 980 X, 3.33 GHz
  • Intel Core i7 975 XE, 3.33 GHz
  • Intel Core i7 965 XE, 3.20 GHz
  • Intel Core i7 950, 3.06 GHz
  • Intel Core i7 940, 2.93 GHz
  • Intel Core i7 920, 2.66 GHz
  • Intel Core i7 875, 2.93 GHz
  • Intel Core i7 870, 2.93 GHz
  • Intel Core i5 750, 2.66 GHz
Memory
  • Intel Socket 1155: Kingston HyperX H2O 2133 CL 9-9-9-27, 2 x 2 GByte
  • Intel Socket 1366, 1156: Corsair Dominator TR3X3G1600C8D CL 8-8-8-24, 3 x 2 GByte
  • Intel Socket 2011: Kingston HyperX H2O 2133 CL 9-9-9-27, 4 x 2 GByte
  • AMD: Corsair Dominator TR3X3G1600C8D CL 8-8-8-24, 2 x 2 GByte
Graphic Card
  • Gigabyte GTX 285
  • Asus GTX 580
  • Integrated graphics
HDD
  • Samsung Spinpoint F1 640 GByte
PSU
  • Enermax Revolution 85+ 1050 Watt


Mobile CPU

CPU - Graphic - Notebook
  • Intel Core i7-2630QM, 2.0 GHz - NVIDIA GeForce 540M - Toshiba Qosmio F750-F10
  • Intel Core i5-2410M, 2.3 GHz - Radeon HD 6470M - Sony Vaio S - VPC-SB1s1EW


We are aware of the fact that notebook configurations show significant deviatons. Because of this we recommend to only take a closer look at those benchmarks which show direct CPU performance.

With Intels launch of the X79 chipset and corresponding CPUs we upgraded our testsystem with an ENGTX 580 graphics card from ASUS. This has the consequence that the benchmark results regarding Futuremark Total Score and gaming benchmarks at high-resolutions aren't comparable to the ones we got using a GTX 285.


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - SuperPi / WPrime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - WinRar
Page 3 - Sandy Bridge CPU / Chipset / Overclocking Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - Resident Evil 5
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Street Fighter 4
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Power consumption
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 15 - Conclusion
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2  



Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]

3DMark 06

3DMark 06 is getting older these days. Therefore if you are using really powerful graphic cards you will hit CPU limitation which means that the graphic card isn't the bottleneck in the system. This is also the reason why in recent high-end desktop systems 3DMark 06 scales nicely with the CPU and the graphic card has much less influence on the scores.

Total

3DMark 06 Total   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 29'052 190.16 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 28'251 184.91 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 21'027 137.63 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 (GTX 285) 20'854 136.50 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 20'850 136.47 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 20'413 133.61 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 20'380 133.39 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 18'825 123.22 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 18'368 120.23 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 17'729 116.04 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 17'617 115.31 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 17'463 114.30 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 17'330 113.43 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 16'985 111.17 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 16'218 106.15 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 16'197 106.02 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 16'155 105.74 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 15'688 102.68 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 15'278 100.00 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 15'087 98.75 %
Intel Core i7-2630QM 8'172 53.49 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (HD 6550D) 6'960 83.75 %
Intel Core i5-2410M 5'078 33.24 %
  more is better


CPU

3DMark 06 CPU   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 8'894 188.63 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 8'624 182.91 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 7'598 161.15 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 7'466 158.35 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 (GTX 285) 6'715 142.42 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 6'710 142.31 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 6'064 128.61 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 6'053 128.38 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 6'007 127.40 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 5'908 125.30 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 5'765 122.27 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 5'539 117.48 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 5'529 117.26 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 5'329 113.02 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 5'166 109.57 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 5'118 108.54 %
Intel Core i7-2630QM 4'936 104.69 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 4'715 100.00 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 4'527 104.15 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 4'242 89.97 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 3'989 84.60 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (HD 6550D) 3'949 83.75 %
Intel Core i5-2410M 3'237 68.65 %
  more is better


3DMark Vantage

3DMark Vantage is able to squeeze nearly everything out of a recent system. Therefore the feature liste is also pretty long: DirectX10, FP16-HDR, motion blur, parallax occlusion mapping, GPU-physics simulation and different shader effects are being used to even make recent high-end systems struggle.

Total

3DMark Vantage Total   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 28'081 216.93 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 27'204 210.15 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 14'320 110.62 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 14'184 109.57 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 (GTX 285) 13'641 105.38 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 13'575 104.87 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 13'506 104.33 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 13'391 103.45 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 13'324 102.93 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 13'256 102.40 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 13'250 102.36 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 13'183 101.84 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 13'157 101.64 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 12'949 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 12'945 100.00 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 12'933 99.91 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 12'715 98.22 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 12'035 92.97 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 11'444 88.40 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 11'257 87.64 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (HD 6550D) 4'045 31.25 %
Intel Core i7-2630QM 4'405 34.03 %
Intel Core i5-2410M 1'989 15.37 %
  more is better


CPU

3DMark Vantage CPU   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 37'752 222.20 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 37'649 221.60 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 33'371 196.42 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 32'154 189.25 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 (GTX 285) 24'035 141.47 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 23'559 138.66 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 21'472 126.38 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 20'171 118.72 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 20'078 118.18 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 19'921 117.25 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 19'285 113.51 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 18'672 109.90 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 18'444 108.56 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 18'605 109.51 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 17'514 103.08 %
Intel Core i7-2630QM 17'367 102.22 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 16'990 100.00 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 16'407 96.57 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 12'791 75.29 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 11'054 67.37 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 9'496 55.89 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (HD 6550D) 9'222 54.28 %
Intel Core i5-2410M 8'509 50.08 %
  more is better


3DMark 11

Total

3DMark 11   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 6'625 114.17 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 6'595 113.64 %
Intel Core i7 920, 2.66 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 5'803 100.00 %
  more is better


CPU

3DMark 11   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 12'596 197.77 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 12'314 193.40 %
Intel Core i7 920, 2.66 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 6'367 100.00 %
  more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - SuperPi / WPrime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - WinRar
Page 3 - Sandy Bridge CPU / Chipset / Overclocking Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - Resident Evil 5
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Street Fighter 4
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Power consumption
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 15 - Conclusion
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2  



Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]

Cinebench

The test procedure consists of two main components: The first test sequence is dedicated to the computer's main processor. A 3D scene file is used to render a photoreaslistic image. The scene makes use of various CPU-intensive features such as reflection, ambient occlusion, area lights and procedural shaders. During the first run the benchmark only uses one CPU (or CPU core) to ascertain a reference value. On computers that have multiple CPUs or CPU cores and on those that simulate multiple CPUs (via HyperThreading or similar technolgies), Cinebench will run a second test using all available CPU power.

1 CPU

Cinebench R10 1 CPU   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 138 sec 61.88 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 141 sec 63.23 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 144 sec 64.57 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 145 sec 65.02 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 147 sec 65.92 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 170 sec 76.23 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 174 sec 78.03 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 178 sec 79.82 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 180 sec 80.72 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 187 sec 83.86 %
Intel Core i5-2410M 195 sec 87.44 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 195 sec 87.44 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 198 sec 88.79 %
Intel Core i7-2630QM 199 sec 89.24 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 203 sec 91.03 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 207 sec 92.83 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 208 sec 93.27 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 223 sec 100.00 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 225 sec 100.89 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 230 sec 103.14 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 237 sec 106.28 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 256 sec 114.80 %
  less is better


X CPU

Cinebench R10 X CPU   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 25 sec 74.55 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 25 sec 74.55 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 30 sec 54.55 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 31 sec 56.36 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 37 sec 67.27 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 37 sec 67.27 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 41 sec 74.55 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 43 sec 78.18 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 43 sec 78.18 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 46 sec 83.64 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 47 sec 85.45 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 48 sec 87.27 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 48 sec 87.27 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 50 sec 90.10 %
Intel Core i7-2630QM 52 sec 94.54 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 52 sec 94.54 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 52 sec 94.54 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 55 sec 100.00 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 63 sec 114.55 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 66 sec 120.00 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 74 sec 134.55 %
Intel Core i5-2410M 94 sec 170.91 %
  less is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - SuperPi / WPrime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - WinRar
Page 3 - Sandy Bridge CPU / Chipset / Overclocking Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - Resident Evil 5
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Street Fighter 4
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Power consumption
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 15 - Conclusion
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2  



Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]

SiSoft Sandra 1

SiSoft Sandra is a theoretical multi purpose benchmark suite which is able to show differences in CPU architectures. We split the tests with SiSoft Sandra into two parts. Therefore on this page you'll find Arithmetic-, Multimedia- and Cryptography-benchmarks.

Arithmetic Benchmark

SiSoft Sandra - Arithmetic - Drystone   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 228.82 GIPS 360.01 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 223.26 GIPS 351.26 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 159.00 GIPS 250.16 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 153.00 GIPS 240.72 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 118.00 GIPS 185.65 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 118.00 GIPS 185.65 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 114.84 GIPS 180.68 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 101.00 GIPS 158.90 %
Intel Core i7-2630QM 86.61 GIPS 136.26 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 82.85 GIPS 130.35 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 82.58 GIPS 129.92 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 76.77 GIPS 120.78 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 76.30 GIPS 120.04 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 73.16 GIPS 115.10 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 71.68 GIPS 112.78 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 69.91 GIPS 109.99 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 68.53 GIPS 107.81 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 65.56 GIPS 103.15 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 63.56 GIPS 100.00 %
Intel Core i5-2410M 45.51 GIPS 71.60 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 44.71 GIPS 70.34 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 41.84 GIPS 65.83 %
  more is better


SiSoft Sandra - Arithmetic - Whetstone   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 141.09 GLFOPS 253.26 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 137.57 GFLOPS 246.94 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 112.24 GFLOPS 201.47 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 108.72 GFLOPS 195.15 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 83.24 GFLOPS 149.42 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 83.00 GFLOPS 148.99 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 71.95 GFLOPS 129.15 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 69.48 GFLOPS 124.72 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 66.70 GFLOPS 119.72 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 64.17 GFLOPS 116.31 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 61.40 GFLOPS 110.21 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 61.29 GFLOPS 110.02 %
Intel Core i7-2630QM 61.01 GFLOPS 109.51 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 60.49 GFLOPS 108.58 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 59.28 GFLOPS 106.41 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 55.71 GFLOPS 100.00 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 55.55 GFLOPS 99.71 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 48.74 GFLOPS 87.49 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 36.88 GFLOPS 66.20 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 33.73 GFLOPS 60.55 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 31.97 GFLOPS 60.98 %
Intel Core i5-2410M 31.82 GFLOPS 50.12 %
  more is better


Multimedia

SiSoft Sandra - Multimedia - Integer   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 351.60 MPixel/s 260.62 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 342.58 MPixel/s 253.93 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 290.50 MPixel/s 215.33 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 279.17 MPixel/s 206.93 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 269.35 MPixel/s 199.65 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 234.54 MPixel/s 173.85 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 222.85 MPixel/s 165.18 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 201.26 MPixel/s 149.18 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 201.00 MPixel/s 148.99 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 157.76 MPixel/s 116.94 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 175.93 MPixel/s 130.40 %
Intel Core i7-2630QM 166.73 MPixel/s 123.59 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 162.22 MPixel/s 120.24 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 162.11 MPixel/s 120.16 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 155.65 MPixel/s 115.37 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 150.19 MPixel/s 111.32 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 148.78 MPixel/s 110.28 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 134.91 MPixel/s 100.00 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 149.22 MPixel/s 90.41 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 116.72 MPixel/s 86.52 %
Intel Core i5-2410M 76.50 MPixel/s 56.70 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 49.72 MPixel/s 39.85 %
  more is better


SiSoft Sandra - Multimedia - Floating point   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 476.00 MPixel/s 456.59 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 467.55 MPixel/s 448.49 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 216.84 MPixel/s 208.00 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 210.19 MPixel/s 201.62 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 154.00 MPixel/s 147.72 %
Intel Core i7-2630QM 153.36 MPixel/s 147.11 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 153.19 MPixel/s 146.94 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 153.00 MPixel/s 146.76 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 132.89 MPixel/s 127.47 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 107.48 MPixel/s 103.10 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 137.16 MPixel/s 131.57 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 135.49 MPixel/s 129.97 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 125.15 MPixel/s 120.05 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 125.10 MPixel/s 120.00 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 119.90 MPixel/s 115.01 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 114.74 MPixel/s 110.06 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 114.44 MPixel/s 109.78 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 104.25 MPixel/s 100.00 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 91.48 MPixel/s 87.75 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 90.02 MPixel/s 86.35 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 82.40 MPixel/s 79.04 %
Intel Core i5-2410M 58.87 MPixel/s 56.47 %
  more is better


Crytography

SiSoft Sandra - Crytography - AES 256   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 12'750 MB/s 2645.23 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 12'700 MB/s 2634.85 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 11'530 MB/s 2392.12 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 11'000 MB/s 2282.16 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 8'480 MB/s 1759.34 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 5'990 MB/s 1161.83 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 5'780 MB/s 1199.17 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 5'520 MB/s 1145.23 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 5'500 MB/s 1141.08 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 724 MB/s 150.21 %
Intel Core i7-2630QM 641 MB/s 132.99 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 625 MB/s 129.67 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 612 MB/s 126.97 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 579 MB/s 120.12 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 573 MB/s 118.88 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 554 MB/s 114.94 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 530 MB/s 109.96 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 528 MB/s 109.54 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 484 MB/s 100.41 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 482 MB/s 100.00 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 456 MB/s 94.61 %
Intel Core i5-2410M 358 MB/s 74.27 %
  more is better


SiSoft Sandra - Crytography - SHA 256   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 1'740 MB/s 389.26 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 1'700 MB/s 380.31 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 1'400 MB/s 313.20 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 1'380 MB/s 308.72 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 1'220 MB/s 272.93 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 1'032 MB/s 230.87 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 875 MB/s 195.75 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 875 MB/s 195.75 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 887 MB/s 198.43 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 801 MB/s 179.19 %
Intel Core i7-2630QM 734 MB/s 164.21 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 592 MB/s 132.44 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 581 MB/s 129.98 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 570 MB/s 127.52 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 537 MB/s 120.13 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 536 MB/s 119.91 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 522 MB/s 116.78 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 514 MB/s 114.99 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 513 MB/s 114.77 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 492 MB/s 110.07 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 447 MB/s 100.00 %
Intel Core i5-2410M 337 MB/s 75.39 %
  more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - SuperPi / WPrime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - WinRar
Page 3 - Sandy Bridge CPU / Chipset / Overclocking Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - Resident Evil 5
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Street Fighter 4
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Power consumption
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 15 - Conclusion
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2  



Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]

SiSoft Sandra 2

At this point we deliver the values regarding Memory Bandwidth, Memory Latency as well as Memory and Cache Access.

Memory bandwidth

SiSoft Sandra - Memory bandwidth - Integer   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 40.18 GB/s 153.07 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 39.51 GB/s 150.51 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 27.28 GB/s 103.92 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 26.62 GB/s 101.41 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 26.61 GB/s 101.37 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 26.60 GB/s 101.33 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 26.54 GB/s 101.10 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 26.48 GB/s 100.88 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 26.40 GB/s 100.57 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 26.25 GB/s 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 19.64 GB/s 74.82 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 17.63 GB/s 67.16 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 17.63 GB/s 67.16 %
Intel Core i7-2630QM 17.29 GB/s 65.87 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 15.13 GB/s 57.64 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 14.95 GB/s 56.95 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 14.51 GB/s 55.28 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 14.00 GB/s 53.33 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 13.68 GB/s 52.11 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 13.36 GB/s 50.90 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 13.00 GB/s 49.52 %
Intel Core i5-2410M 9.00 GB/s 34.29 %
  more is better


SiSoft Sandra - Memory bandwidth - Floating point[/fr]   [en]Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 40.33 GB/s 153.76 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 39.92 GB/s 152.19 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 27.26 GB/s 103.93 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 26.59 GB/s 101.37 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 26.58 GB/s 101.33 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 26.56 GB/s 101.26 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 26.58 GB/s 101.33 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 26.49 GB/s 100.99 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 26.40 GB/s 100.65 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 26.23 GB/s 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 19.64 GB/s 74.88 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 17.63 GB/s 67.21 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 17.62 GB/s 67.14 %
Intel Core i7-2630QM 17.28 GB/s 65.88 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 15.10 GB/s 57.57 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 15.00 GB/s 57.19 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 14.62 GB/s 55.74 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 14.00 GB/s 53.37 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 13.64 GB/s 52.00 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 13.36 GB/s 50.93 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 13.00 GB/s 49.56 %
Intel Core i5-2410M 9.00 GB/s 34.31 %
  more is better


Memory latency

SiSoft Sandra - Memory latency   Percent
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 57 ns 83.36 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 62 ns 93.93 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 62 ns 93.93 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 63 ns 95.45 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 63 ns 95.45 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 64 ns 96.97 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 65 ns 98.48 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 66 ns 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 67.5 ns 102.27 %
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 70.6 ns 106.97 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 68 ns 103.03 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 71.9 ns 108.94 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 72 ns 109.09 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 72.8 ns 110.30 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 73 ns 115.15 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 79 ns 119.70 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 80 ns 121.21 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 81 ns 122.72 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 82 ns 124.24 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 82 ns 124.24 %
Intel Core i5-2410M 88 ns 133.33 %
Intel Core i7-2630QM 92 ns 139.39 %
  less is better


Memory and cache access

SiSoft Sandra - Memory and cache access   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 202.59 GB/s 300.53 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 195.93 GB/s 290.65 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 114.31 GB/s 169.57 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 111.02 GB/s 164.69 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 98.67 GB/s 146.37 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 96.90 GB/s 143.75 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 94.26 GB/s 139.83 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 84.50 GB/s 125.35 %
Intel Core i7-2630QM 83.22 GB/s 123.45 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 78.06 GB/s 115.80 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 77.80 GB/s 115.41 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 74.66 GB/s 110.76 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 72.89 GB/s 108.13 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 71.05 GB/s 105.40 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 71.00 GB/s 105.33 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 67.54 GB/s 100.19 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 67.41 GB/s 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 57.69 GB/s 85.58 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 56.74 GB/s 84.17 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 53.94 GB/s 80.02 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 51.00 GB/s 75.66 %
Intel Core i5-2410M 37.68 GB/s 55.90 %
  more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - SuperPi / WPrime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - WinRar
Page 3 - Sandy Bridge CPU / Chipset / Overclocking Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - Resident Evil 5
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Street Fighter 4
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Power consumption
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 15 - Conclusion
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2  



Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]

Super Pi

Meanwhile Super Pi even in its latest version has become pretty old. Never the less it is able to show scaling to the clock speed nicely.

1M

Super Pi 1.5 XS - 1M   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 9.641 sec 63.78 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 9.891 sec 65.43 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 10.015 sec 66.25 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 10.381 sec 68.67 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 10.392 sec 68.74 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 11.466 sec 75.84 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 11.589 sec 76.66 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 11.700 sec 77.40 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 11.700 sec 77.40 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 12.636 sec 83.59 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 13.177 sec 87.17 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 13.260 sec 87.71 %
Intel Core i7-2630QM 13.572 sec 89.78 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 13.760 sec 91.02 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 13.975 sec 92.45 %
Intel Core i5-2410M 14.118 sec 93.39 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 15.117 sec 100.00 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 19.376 sec 128.17 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 20.717 sec 137.04 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 21.466 sec 142.00 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 21.965 sec 145.30 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 25.319 sec 167.49 %
  less is better


32M

Super Pi 1.5 XS - 32M   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 529.605 sec 66.22 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 535.985 sec 67.02 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 540.806 sec 67.62 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 559.963 sec 70.01 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 572.057 sec 71.53 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 624.875 sec 78.13 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 635.233 sec 79.43 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 635.701 sec 79.48 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 631.426 sec 78.95 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 678.429 sec 84.83 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 683.795 sec 85.50 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 701.328 sec 87.69 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 707.463 sec 88.08 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 734.089 sec 91.79 %
Intel Core i7-2630QM 735.994 sec 92.02 %
Intel Core i5-2410M 743.492 sec 92.96 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 799.781 sec 100.00 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 1170.907 sec 146.40 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 1173.496 sec 146.73 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 1234.602 sec 154.37 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 1294.459 sec 161.85 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 1336.377 sec 167.09 %
  less is better


wPrime

wPrime is based on a multithreaded algorithm to calculate the square root to up to 32 billion digits. Therefore it is possible to put 100 percent load on every core or thread and to see differences between architectures.

32M (1 Core)

wPrime - 32M (1 Core)   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 31.201 sec 67.64 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 32.012 sec 69.40 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 32.544 sec 70.55 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 33.522 sec 72.67 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 33.885 sec 73.46 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 34.758 sec 75.35 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 35.132 sec 76.16 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHz DDR3-1600 35.338 sec 76.61 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 35.406 sec 76.75 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 36.786 sec 79.74 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 38.297 sec 83.02 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 39.243 sec 85.07 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 39.965 sec 86.64 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 40.395 sec 87.07 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 41.901 sec 90.85 %
Intel Core i5-2410M 43.384 sec 94.05 %
Intel Core i7-2630QM 43.865 sec 95.09 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 45.771 sec 99.22 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 46.130 sec 100.00 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 49.531 sec 107.37 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 52.761 sec 114.37 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 52.372 sec 113.53 %
  less is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - SuperPi / WPrime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - WinRar
Page 3 - Sandy Bridge CPU / Chipset / Overclocking Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - Resident Evil 5
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Street Fighter 4
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Power consumption
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1  Page 15 - Conclusion
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2  



Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]

WinRAR

WinRAR is a well known archivier. It is highly efficient and it also comes with an integrated benchmark routine. We also do a real world application be archiving a folder which exists on the hard drive.

Benchmark Test

WinRAR - Benchmark Test   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 4'595 KB/sec 130.58 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 4'352 KB/sec 123.67 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 4'287 KB/sec 121.82 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 4'131 KB/sec 117.39 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 4'108 KB/sec 116.74 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 4'051 KB/sec 115.12 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 3'998 KB/sec 113.61 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 3'929 KB/sec 111.65 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 3'849 KB/sec 109.38 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 3'738 KB/sec 106.22 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 3'694 KB/sec 104.97 %
Intel Core i7-2630QM 3'656 KB/sec 103.89 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 3'519 KB/sec 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 3'489 KB/sec 99.15 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 3'465 KB/sec 98.47 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 3'251 KB/sec 92.38 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 3'169 KB/sec 90.05 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 2'905 KB/sec 82.55 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 2'395 KB/sec 68.06 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 2'395 KB/sec 68.06 %
Intel Core i5-2410M 2'318 KB/sec 65.87 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 1'821 KB/sec 51.75 %
  more is better


Folder compression

WinRAR - Folder compression (669 Files / 32 Folders / 694 MB)   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 83 sec 56.46 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 84 sec 57.14 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 88 sec 59.86 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 104 sec 70.75 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 105 sec 71.43 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 113 sec 76.87 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 116 sec 78.91 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 120 sec 81.63 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 122 sec 82.99 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 130 sec 88.43 %
Intel Core i7-2630QM 132 sec 89.79 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 135 sec 91.83 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 138 sec 93.88 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 141 sec 95.91 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 147 sec 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 174 sec 118.37 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 175 sec 119.05 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 181 sec 123.13 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 190 sec 129.25 %
Intel Core i5-2410M 195 sec 132.65 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 215 sec 146.63 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 239 sec 162.59 %
  less is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - SuperPi / WPrime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - WinRar
Page 3 - Sandy Bridge CPU / Chipset / Overclocking Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - Resident Evil 5
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Street Fighter 4
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Power consumption
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1  Page 15 - Conclusion
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2  



Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]


Crysis DirectX10

Crysis is still one of the games which has very high system requirements. Therefore developer Crytek implemented Direct3D-10-API, High-Dynamic-Range-Rendering, Parallax Occlusion Mapping, Soft Shadows, Motion Blur, Depth of Field as well as Soft Particles. We test Crysis by using DirectX10 to show CPU-sacaling especially which low resolutions. If we look at the high resolutions we are able to spot that the CPUs influence compared to the graphic card becomes much less important.

Crysis DirectX10

800 x 600, low details

Crysis DirectX10 (800 x 600 low details)   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 196.58 fps 156.64 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 177.77 fps 141.65 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 158.73 fps 126.48 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 156.42 fps 124.64 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 (GTX 285) 153.58 fps 122.37 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 146.41 fps 116.66 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 142.24 fps 113.34 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 136.38 fps 108.67 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 139.91 fps 111.48 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 135.65 fps 108.09 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 132.60 fps 105.66 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 125.50 fps 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 122.66 fps 97.74 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 117.36 fps 93.51 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 112.67 fps 89.78 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 109.52 fps 87.67 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 107.91 fps 85.98 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 106.91 fps 85.19 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (HD 6550D) 91.87 fps 73.20 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 90.35 fps 71.99 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 89.77 fps 71.53 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 (Intel Graphics HD3000) 45.31 fps 36.10 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 (Intel Graphics HD3000) 44.10 fps 35.14 %
  more is better


1920 x 1080, very high details, 16x AA

Crysis DirectX10 (1920 x 1080 high details, 16x AA)   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 39.68 fps 202.14 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 38.69 fps 197.10 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 24.69 fps 125.78 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 24.65 fps 125.57 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 (GTX 285) 19.99 fps 101.83 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 19.93 fps 101.53 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 19.92 fps 101.48 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 19.83 fps 101.02 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 19.80 fps 100.87 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 19.79 fps 100.79 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 19.74 fps 100.58 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 19.72 fps 100.48 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 19.69 fps 100.26 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 19.63 fps 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 19.55 fps 99.59 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 19.35 fps 98.57 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 19.32 fps 98.42 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 19.29 fps 98.27 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 17.15 fps 87.37 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 17.03 fps 86.75 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (HD 6550D) 5.88 fps 29.95 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 (Intel Graphics HD3000) 3.78 fps 19.26 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 (Intel Graphics HD3000) 2.02 fps 10.29 %
  more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - SuperPi / WPrime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - WinRar
Page 3 - Sandy Bridge CPU / Chipset / Overclocking Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - Resident Evil 5
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Street Fighter 4
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Power consumption
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1  Page 15 - Conclusion
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2  



Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]

Resident Evil 5 DirectX10

Resident Evil uses nearly every modern rendering technology: HDR, Hemisphere Lighting, Soft Shadows, Soft Particles, Field- und Motion-Blur oder auch Alpha to Coverage and static Ambient Occlusion. Furthermore Resident Evil 5 has been optimized for multicore architectures and already comes DirectX11 ready. By using the DirectX10 benchmark we can again show you CPU-scaling with low resolutions and the compared to the CPU overproportional influence of the graphics card at high resolutions.

Resident Evil DirectX10

800 x 600, low details

Resident Evil DirectX10 (800 x 600 low details)   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 244.8 fps 167.67 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 233.9 fps 160.21 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 (GTX 285) 199.9 fps 136.92 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 195.0 fps 135.56 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 193.4 fps 132.47 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 185.0 fps 126.71 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 171.2 fps 117.26 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 170.0 fps 116.44 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 163.0 fps 111.64 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 160.2 fps 109.73 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 160.2 fps 109.73 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 154.9 fps 106.10 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 146.0 fps 100.00 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 131.5 fps 90.07 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 128.0 fps 87.67 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 126.7 fps 86.78 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 126.1 fps 86.67 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 110.7 fps 75.82 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 110.6 fps 75.75 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 94.0 fps 64.38 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (HD 6550D) 84.20 fps 57.67 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 (Intel Graphics HD3000) 57.5 fps 39.38 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 (Intel Graphics HD3000) 56.0 fps 38.36 %
  more is better


1920 x 1080, high details, 8x AA

Resident Evil DirectX10 (1920 x 1080 high details, 8x AA)   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 136.7 fps 185.23 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 133.9 fps 181.44 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 (GTX 285) 76.4 fps 103.52 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 76.0 fps 102.98 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 75.9 fps 102.85 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 75.2 fps 101.90 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 75.0 fps 101.63 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 74.8 fps 101.36 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 74.3 fps 100.68 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 74.3 fps 100.68 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 74.2 fps 100.54 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 74.1 fps 100.41 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 74.0 fps 100.27 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 73.8 fps 100.00 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 73.6 fps 99.73 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 72.9 fps 98.78 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 72.1 fps 97.70 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 69.9 fps 94.72 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 60.1 fps 81.44 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 59.2 fps 80.22 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (HD 6550D) 23.5 fps 31.84 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 (Intel Graphics HD3000) 10.8 fps 14.63 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 (Intel Graphics HD3000) 9.7 fps 13.14 %
  more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - SuperPi / WPrime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - WinRar
Page 3 - Sandy Bridge CPU / Chipset / Overclocking Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - Resident Evil 5
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Street Fighter 4
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Power consumption
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1  Page 15 - Conclusion
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2  



Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]

Street Fighter4

Street Fighter 4 comes with an extra benchmark version which makes testing you system childrens play. At low resolutions the system requirements are pretty low and we can see CPU-scaling in the results. At high resolution the graphic card becomes more important and the CPUs clock speed has less influence on the fps.

800 x 600, low details

Street Fighter 4 (800 x 600 low details)   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 939.64 fps 247.99 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 927.89 fps 244.88 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 595.43 fps 157.14 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 585.21 fps 154.45 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 (GTX 285) 520.13 fps 137.27 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 504.97 fps 133.27 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 497.45 fps 131.28 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 486.46 fps 128.38 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 460.91 fps 121.64 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 444.66 fps 117.35 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 441.01 fps 116.39 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 432.45 fps 114.13 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 425.52 fps 112.30 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 397.63 fps 104.94 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 385.73 fps 101.80 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 378.91 fps 100.00 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 354.12 fps 93.46 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 345.83 fps 91.27 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 312.10 fps 82.37 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 230.69 fps 60.88 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (HD 6550D) 177.10 fps 46.74 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 (Intel Graphics HD3000) 119.68 fps 31.59 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 (Intel Graphics HD3000) 95.83 fps 25.29 %
  more is better


1920 x 1080, high details, 8x AA, 16x AF

Street Fighter 4 (1920 x 1080 high details, 8x AA, 16x AF)   Percent
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 241.98 fps 302.32 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 240.93 fps 301.01 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 107.88 fps 134.78 %
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 106.64 fps 133.23 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 98.06 fps 122.51 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 (GTX 285) 88.25 fps 110.26 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 87.93 fps 109.86 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 90.76 fps 113.39 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 87.18 fps 108.92 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 87.10 fps 108.82 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 86.66 fps 108.27 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 85.58 fps 106.92 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 82.86 fps 103.52 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 82.51 fps 103.08 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 80.46 fps 100.52 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 80.27 fps 100.29 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 80.17 fps 100.16 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 80.12 fps 100.10 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 80.04 fps 100.00 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 61.23 fps 76.50 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (HD 6550D) 26.09 fps 32.60 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 (Intel Graphics HD3000) 10.24 fps 12.79 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 (Intel Graphics HD3000) 7.46 fps 9.32 %
  more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - SuperPi / WPrime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - WinRar
Page 3 - Sandy Bridge CPU / Chipset / Overclocking Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - Resident Evil 5
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Street Fighter 4
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Power consumption
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1  Page 15 - Conclusion
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2  



Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]

Power consumption

Hereby we take the power consumption under load as well as idle. To generate a load situation we use SiSoft Sandra's Burn-In Module and measure the whole systems power consumption. The values we take when the System just booted into Windows and the load drops.

Idle Consumption Percent
Intel Core i5-2410M 12 Watt 9.23 %
Intel Core i7-2630QM 20 Watt 15.38 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 (Intel Graphics HD3000) 45 Watt 34.62 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (HD 6550D) 46 Watt 35.38 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 (Intel Graphics HD3000) 47 Watt 36.15 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 73 Watt 56.15 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 74 Watt 56.82 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 74 Watt 56.92 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 (GTX 285) 76 Watt 58.46 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 76 Watt 58.46 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 81 Watt 62.31 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 85 Watt 65.38 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 86 Watt 66.15 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 91 Watt 70.00 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 106 Watt 81.54 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 126 Watt 96.92 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 128 Watt 98.46 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 130 Watt 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 132 Watt 101.53 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 134 Watt 103.08 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 136 Watt 104.62 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 140 Watt 107.69 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 149 Watt 114.62 %
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 172 Watt 132.31 %
  less is better


Load Consumption Percent
Intel Core i5-2410M 81 Watt 40.30 %
Intel Core i7-2630QM 116 Watt 57.71 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 (Intel Graphics HD3000) 119 Watt 59.20 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 (Intel Graphics HD3000) 133 Watt 66.17 %
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 135 Watt 67.16 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 150 Watt 74.63 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 146 Watt 72.64 %
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 (GTX 285) 154 Watt 76.62 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 155 Watt 77.11 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (HD 6550D) 167 Watt 83.08 %
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 179 Watt 89.05 %
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 181 Watt 90.05 %
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 196 Watt 97.51 %
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) 198 Watt 98.51 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 201 Watt 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 206 Watt 102.49 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 211 Watt 104.98 %
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 214 Watt 106.47 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 216 Watt 107.46 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 220 Watt 109.45 %
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.20 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 243 Watt 120.90 %
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 248 Watt 123.38 %
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) 254 Watt 126.37 %
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX 580) 311 Watt 154.73 %
  less is better



 

Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - SuperPi / WPrime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - WinRar
Page 3 - Sandy Bridge CPU / Chipset / Overclocking Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - Resident Evil 5
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Street Fighter 4
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Power consumption
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1  Page 15 - Conclusion
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2  



Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]

Conclusion

With Sandy Bridge E, Intel presents an entirely new platform in the high-end desktop segment, whereas the new CPUs need to be placed in the Socket LGA 2011 and not in the Socket LGA 1366 like it was with X58. In short Intel has made the same architectural changes like they've already done with Sandy Bridge but this time they did it for their high-end desktop CPUs. The difference between Sandy Bridge E and Sandy Bridge is that the E-models get more of everthing: they get more cores, more threads, more cache and a wider quad channel memory interface. They even get 40 PCI-Express lanes.

Once more it is astonishing: the new Core i7-3960X is able to outperorm any other CPU and claim the first rank in all the benchmarks we made it run through. The Core i7-3930K only had to take a beating in two benchmarks. There was SuperPi 32m where the Core i7-2600K was faster and there was WinRAR where the AMD FX-8150 was able to score better. Intel once more succeeded in creating a CPU that put desktop performance to higher level.

But as always when a CPU is really fast it's also really expensive. Therefore the extreme version, the Core i7-3960X, also comes with an extreme price tag of 999 US-Dollar. But interestingly the Core i7-3930K comes with a very attractive price of 555 US-Dollar. Although this isn't cheap it fills a gap which a lot of desktop enthusiasts are willing to spend their money.

An other downside of these powerful CPUs is the power they draw. When we equipped our test system with Intels flagship CPU Core i7-3960X we almost couldn't believe how much power it needed to operate. In this case we can only say that a user who is going to spend 999 US-Dollar on a CPU wont care about the electricity bill. With the Core i7-3930K things look a bit better but it still need a lot of power to run, which means that Intels Core i7-2600K CPUs are way more energy efficient.

Compared to Intels X58 platform using socket LGA 1366 CPUs the new Sandy Brdige E processors mounted on an X79 chipst with socket LGA 2011 really is an upgrade, performance wise. If you should be looking for maximum performance and you're willing to buy a quad channel memory kit, then this platform is the right way to go. Users who demand for maximum energy efficiency are better off with an LGA 1155 setup.


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - SuperPi / WPrime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - WinRar
Page 3 - Sandy Bridge CPU / Chipset / Overclocking Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - Resident Evil 5
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Street Fighter 4
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Power consumption
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1  Page 15 - Conclusion
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2  


Author : Marc Büchel, m.buechel@ocaholic.ch


Discuss this article in the forum