NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN - Aircooling vs. Watercooling EK-FC TITAN

Published by Marc Büchel on 30.04.14
Page:
« 1 ... 10 11 12 (13) 14 15 16 »

Power Consumption

Stock Clocks - Idle Watt Index
Aircooling GTX TITAN (GPU 837 / Mem 1502 MHz) 47 100.00 %
Watercooling GTX TITAN (GPU 837 / Mem 1502 MHz) 47 100.00 %
  More is better


Overclocking - Idle Watt Index
Aircooling GTX TITAN (GPU 1150 / Mem 1850 MHz) 68 144.68 %
Watercooling GTX TITAN (GPU 1185 / Mem 1850 MHz) 70 148.94 %
  More is better


Stock Clocks - Load Watt Index
Aircooling GTX TITAN (GPU 837 / Mem 1502 MHz) 306 100.00 %
Watercooling GTX TITAN (GPU 837 / Mem 1502 MHz) 318 103.92 %
  More is better


Overclocking - Load Watt Index
Aircooling GTX TITAN (GPU 1150 / Mem 1850 MHz) 324 105.88 %
Watercooling GTX TITAN (GPU 1185 / Mem 1850 MHz) 346 113.07 %
  More is better



Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 10 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 11 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 12 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 4 Page 13 - Power Consumption
Page 6 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - Temperatures
Page 7 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Index
Page 8 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Conclusion



  Items by the same author View this article in PDF format Print article

Navigate through the articles
Previous article ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti DirectCU II OC - Watercooling EK-FC GTX780 DCII vs. Aircooling ASUS R9 290X Matrix Platinum - Watercooling EK FC-R9-290X Matrix vs. Aircooling Next article
comments powered by Disqus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN - Aircooling vs. Watercooling EK-FC TITAN - Graphics cards > Aircooling vs. Watercooling - Reviews - ocaholic