Article in English | Artikel in Deutsch | Article en français | Articolo in italiano |
R9 280X TurboDuo OC | R9 280X DC II Top | Radeon R9 280X | |
Chip | Tahiti XT2/L | Tahiti XT2/L | Tahiti XT2/L |
Process | 28 nm | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Transistors | 4.31 billion | 4.31 billion | 4.31 billion |
GPU clock | 880 MHz | 1'070 MHz | 850 MHz |
GPU Boost clock | 1'030 MHz | N/A | 1'000 MHz |
Memory GDDR5 | 3'072 MB | 3'072 MB | 3'072 MB |
Memory clock | 1'500 (6'000) MHz | 1'600 (6'400) MHz | 1'500 (6'000) MHz |
Memory interface | 384 Bit | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 307.2 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
Shader Cores | 2'048 | 2'048 | 2'048 |
TMUs | 128 | 128 | 128 |
ROPs | 32 | 32 | 32 |
TDP | xxx Watt | xxx Watt | 250 Watt |
PCB Type | Reference Design | Custom Design | Reference Design |
Lenght (PCB - Total) | 26.8 - 26.8 cm | 26.8 - 28.7 cm | xx.x - xx.x cm |
Height (PCB - Total) | 11.0 - 13.0 cm | 12.2 - 14.8 cm | xx.x - xx.x cm |
Slots | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Cooler | TurboDuo | DirectCU II | AMD Reference |
Launch Price | $XXX | $XXX | $299 |
Graphics Cards | Performance Index | Power C. (Watts)* | Performance/Watt*10 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti (ASUS DC2T) | 53.55 | 178 | 3.01 |
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN (Ref) | 85.05 | 306 | 2.78 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 770 (ASUS DC2OC) | 70.92 | 257 | 2.76 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 670 (ASUS DC2T) | 62.00 | 227 | 2.73 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti (GBT GHz) | 90.53 | 333 | 2.72 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 (ASUS DC2OC) | 81.66 | 302 | 2.70 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 (ASUS DC2T) | 47.37 | 177 | 2.68 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 (Ref) | 68.36 | 258 | 2.65 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 760 (ASUS DC2OC) | 56.63 | 218 | 2.60 |
AMD Radeon R9 270 (ASUS DC2OC) | 50.00 | 195 | 2.56 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost (Ref) | 40.87 | 169 | 2.42 |
AMD Radeon R9 270X (ASUS DC2T) | 53.85 | 230 | 2.34 |
AMD Radeon HD 7870 (ASUS DC2T V2) | 50.53 | 219 | 2.31 |
AMD Radeon HD 7850 (ASUS DC2T) | 42.39 | 190 | 2.23 |
AMD Radeon HD 7790 (ASUS DC2OC - Ref PCB) | 33.44 | 151 | 2.21 |
ASUS Radeon R9 280X DirectCU II Top | 73.03 | 334 | 2.19 |
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition (ASUS Matrix P.) | 70.75 | 325 | 2.18 |
AMD Radeon R9 280X (ASUS DC2T) | 68.85 | 321 | 2.14 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti (ASUS DC2T) | 30.8 | 151 | 2.04 |
PowerColor Radeon R9 280X TurboDuo OC | 69.43 | 347 | 2.00 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 580 (Ref) | 50.49 | 254 | 1.99 |
AMD Radeon HD 7970 (XFX DD - Ref PCB) | 64.27 | 329 | 1.95 |
AMD Radeon HD 6950 (Ref) | 36.83 | 208 | 1.77 |
AMD Radeon HD 6970 (Ref) | 41.19 | 252 | 1.63 |
AMD Radeon HD 6870 (Ref) | 31.88 | 200 | 1.59 |
AMD Radeon HD 5850 (Ref) | 30.05 | 193 | 1.56 |
AMD Radeon HD 5870 (Ref) | 35.98 | 232 | 1.55 |
AMD Radeon HD 6990 (Ref) | 73.44 | 500 | 1.47 |
*Entire system | More is better | Less is better | More is better |
Graphics Cards | Performance Index | Price (€)* | Performance/€*10 |
AMD Radeon HD 7790 | 33.44 | 91 | 3.67 |
AMD Radeon HD 7870 | 50.53 | 143 | 3.53 |
AMD Radeon R9 270 | 50.00 | 144 | 3.47 |
AMD Radeon HD 7850 | 42.39 | 124 | 3.42 |
AMD Radeon R9 270X | 53.85 | 159 | 3.39 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | 40.87 | 121 | 3.38 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 | 47.37 | 144 | 3.29 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti | 30.80 | 100 | 3.08 |
AMD Radeon R9 280X | 68.85 | 241 | 2.86 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 760 | 56.63 | 199 | 2.85 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 53.55 | 193 | 2.77 |
AMD Radeon HD 7970 | 64.27 | 232 | 2.77 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 670 | 62.00 | 228 | 2.72 |
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition | 70.75 | 260 | 2.72 |
ASUS Radeon R9 280X DirectCU II Top | 73.03 | 271 | 2.69 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 770 | 70.92 | 266 | 2.67 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 580 | 50.49 | 190 | 2.66 |
AMD Radeon HD 6870 | 31.88 | 126 | 2.53 |
PowerColor Radeon R9 280X TurboDuo OC | 69.43 | 277 | 2.51 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 | 68.36 | 291 | 2.35 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 | 81.66 | 415 | 1.97 |
AMD Radeon HD 6950 | 36.83 | 205 | 1.80 |
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 90.53 | 582 | 1.56 |
AMD Radeon HD 6970 | 41.19 | 310 | 1.33 |
AMD Radeon HD 5850 | 30.05 | 260 | 1.16 |
AMD Radeon HD 5870 | 35.98 | 335 | 1.07 |
AMD Radeon HD 6990 | 73.44 | 708 | 1.04 |
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN | 85.05 | 832 | 1.02 |
* 06/01/2014 | More is better | Less is better | More is better |
General | + | - | |
With the Radeon R9 280X TurboDuo OC, PowerColor is
offering a R9 280X based on a Radeon HD 7970 reference PCB paired up
with their own new cooling solution. Overall, the TurboDuo OC did good
in our testing, performance is the way we expected it to be, cooling performance
is
on a good level, the card is very silent and we like the design of the
cooler. As always we would have liked to see the manufacturer overclock the memory and it would have been nice to get a higher factory overclocking on the GPU. Further improvements could have also been made regarding the price and power consumption under load. |
- Performance
- Cooling performance - Design - Noise levels - Bundle |
- Memory Clock
- Price |
|
Cooling / Noise Level | + | - | |
PowerColor's new TurboDuo cooler did a very good job on the Radeon R9 280X. The cooling performance was on a good level and most of all the noise levels were very good. The card is inaudible in idle and very silent under load. | - Cooling performance
- Noise levels |
||
Performance | + | - | |
Overall the 3D performance is good but as said
previously, we would like PowerColor to push the factory clock further
in order to improve performance of its card and stand out from the
masses because the slight overclock of 30 MHz does only bring roughtly 1
% performance gain. Idle power consumption of the PowerColor card is very good, we measured 46 Watts on the wall, 2 to 3 Watts less than other tested Radeon R9 280X. Unfortunately the card doesn't shine green under load with a rather high result. With the PowerColor card our system draws 347 Watts under FurMark while it draws between 335 and 321 Watts with other R9 280X or even a reference Radeon HD 7970. |
- Performance
- idle power consumption |
- Performance/Price
- Power consumption under load |
|
Recommendation / Price | + | - | |
It looks like PowerColor focussed effort on the
cooler and didn't pay too much attention to the rest for. In
the end it results in a silent and well cooled graphics card but with
high load power consumption and shy factory overclocking. The price has also been overlooked, the TurboDuo OC costs 30 Euros more than the cheapest R9 280X and you can find faster and better cooled cards with custom PCB for less money. |
- Gaming | - Price | |
We gave the Radeon R9 280X TurboDuo OC from PowerColor 3.5 out of 5 stars. | |||