Comparisons of two mid-range (roughly) graphics cards with one high-end VGA are almost always good for some really interesting results. Today we're having a look at what two AMD Radeon R9 270 graphics cards can do against one Radeon R9 290X. If you keep in mind, that the R9 290X is just a little more expensive than two R9 270 cards then things could be quite interesting.
First of all,
let us talk about prices. For the sake of argument, let us consider that
the two Radeon R9 270 graphics cards cost 336 Euro and compare that to the
369 Euro you would have to pay for the cheapest reference Radeon R9 290X we can
find. Therefore, this one high-end card is is going to be 9 percent more
expensive than the
two mid-range cards.
To dive a bit deeper into the results, we start with performance differences in
3DMark graphics score where we see that the CrossFire of the two R9 270 is
about a percent faster
than the Radeon R9 290X in case of the graphics score. In the next theoretical test we ran, Unigine Heaven, we
see that the two R9 270 graphics cards are, on average, 32 percent slower than the 290X. In case of games it turns out that, for example in Skyrim,
a
single Radeon R9 290X card is about 47 percent faster than the two R9 270
graphics cards in CrossFire. A
closer look at the Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 shows the other end of the scale, where
the two R9 270 score 12 percent better than the single Radeon R9 290X.
Overall the two R9 270 graphics cards are performing really well on average,
while in the end, the R9 290X
is still 9.2 percent faster than two R9 270 in CrossFire. The bigger problem is that the average value is not even telling half the story. It turns out that in one of the games
we tested, the single card was faster, but then, there are games where the difference is small and, last but not least, there are some titles where the two
R9 270 cards are a lot faster. This in the end makes the performance rather unpredictable.
This comparison is becoming most interesting when having a close look at power
consumption. In idle, the power consumption of our test system is
26 percent higher with two R9
270 compared to one R9 290X and under load conditions the story changes, as the
single Radeon R9 290X graphics card burns 31 percent more power than two
Radeon R9 270 graphics cards. So basically the CrossFire setup under load
burns about 30 percent less power but is just about 9 percent slower.
Comparisons of two mid-range (roughly) graphics cards with one high-end VGA are almost always good for some really interesting results. Today we're having a look at what two AMD Radeon R9 270 graphics cards can do against one Radeon R9 290X. If you keep in mind, that the R9 290X is just a little more expensive than two R9 270 cards then things could be quite interesting.
Article in English
Artikel in Deutsch
Article en français
Articolo in italiano
