Sandy Bridge, this is the codename of Intels latest CPU generation which is based on an overworked Nehalem microarchitecture. We had the chance to test two of the upcoming CPUs, namely the Core i7 2600K and the Core i5 2500K. They both come with an improved graphics core which has been integrated into the same piece of silicium as the CPU itself.
Both models we tested are quad core CPUs
whereas the Core i7 2600K supports hyperthreading and the Core i5 2500K doesn't.
Another difference between the two CPUs is their cache size. Therefore the 2600K
which aims more at the high-end market has been equipped with 8 MByte of L3
cache whereas the 2500K only got 6 MByte.
Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]
Specifications
|
i7 2600K |
i5 2500K |
i7 875 K |
i7 980 X |
Codename |
Sandy Bridge |
Sandy Bridge |
Lynnfield |
Nehalem |
Socket |
LGA 1155 |
LGA 1155 |
LGA 1156 |
LGA 1366 |
Manufacturing |
32 nm |
32 nm |
45 nm |
32 nm |
Transistors |
995 Mio |
995 Mio |
774 Mio |
1.17 Bio |
Die-size |
265 mm2 |
265 mm2 |
296 mm2 |
248 mm2 |
Clock |
3.40 GHz (3.80 GHz Turbo) |
3.30 GHz (3.70 GHz Turbo) |
2.93 GHz |
3.33 GHz |
Cores / Threads |
4C / 8T |
4C / 4T |
4C / 8T |
6C / 12T |
Turbo |
Yes (2.0) |
Yes (2.0) |
Yes (1.0) |
Yes (1.0) |
Bus Speed |
100 MHz |
100 MHz |
133 MHz |
133 MHz |
Memory |
DDR3 |
DDR3 |
DDR3 |
DDR3 |
Memory controller |
Dual Channel |
Dual Channel |
Dual Channel |
Triple Channel |
QPI |
-- |
-- |
4.26 GT/s |
6.4 GT/s |
L1 Execution Cache |
32 KByte |
32 KByte |
32 KByte |
32 KByte |
L1 Data Cache |
32 KByte |
32 KByte |
32 KByte |
32 KByte |
L2 Cache |
256 KByte |
256 KByte |
256 KByte |
256 KByte |
L3 Cache |
8 MB shared |
6 MB shared |
8 MB shared |
12 MB shared |
TDP |
95 Watt |
95 Watt |
95 Watt |
130 Watt |
C1E technology |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Enhanced Intel Speed Step |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Virtualisation |
Vanderpool |
Vanderpool |
Vanderpool |
Vanderpool |
Instruction sets |
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3
SSE4.2, AVX, EM64T |
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3
SSE4.2, AVX, EM64T |
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3
SSE4.2, EM64T |
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3
SSE4.2, EM64T |
Sandy Bridge Specs
Modell | Cores/Threads |
Stock/Turbo | L3-Cache | Grafik | Grafiktakt/Turbo | TDP |
Core i7-2600K |
4C / 8T |
3,4 / 3,8 GHz |
8 MB |
HD 3000 |
850 / 1.350 MHz |
95 W |
Core i7-2600 | 4C / 8T | 3,4 / 3,8 GHz | 8 MB | HD 2000 | 850 / 1.350 MHz | 95 W |
Core i7-2600S | 4C / 8T | 2,8 / 3,8 GHz | 8 MB | HD 2000 | 850 / 1.100 MHz | 65 W |
Core i5-2500K |
4C / 4T |
3,3 / 3,7 GHz |
6 MB |
HD 3000 |
850 / 1.100 MHz |
95 W |
Core i5-2500 | 4C / 4T | 3,3 / 3,7 GHz | 6 MB | HD 2000 | 850 / 1.100 MHz | 95 W |
Core i5-2500S | 4C / 4T | 2,7 / 3,7 GHz | 6 MB | HD 2000 | 850 / 1.100 MHz | 65 W |
Core i5-2500T | 4C / 4T | 2,3 / 3,3 GHz | 6 MB | HD 2000 | 650 / 1.250 MHz | 45 W |
Core i5-2400 | 4C / 4T | 3,1 / 3,4 GHz | 6 MB | HD 2000 | 850 / 1.100 MHz | 95 W |
Core i5-2400S | 4C / 4T | 2,5 / 3,3 GHz | 6 MB | HD 2000 | 850 / 1.100 MHz | 65 W |
Core i5-2300 | 4C / 4T | 2,8 / 3,1 GHz | 6 MB | HD 2000 | 850 / 1.100 MHz | 95 W |
Core i5-2390T | 2C / 4T | 2,7 / 3,5 GHz | 3 MB | HD 2000 | 650 / 1.100 MHz | 35 W |
Core i3-2120 | 2C / 4T | 3,3 / - GHz | 3 MB | HD 2000 | 850 / 1.100 MHz | 65 W |
Core i3-2100 | 2C / 4T | 3,1 / - GHz | 3 MB | HD 2000 | 850 / 1.100 MHz | 65 W |
Core i3-2100T | 2C / 4T | 2,5 / - GHz | 3 MB | HD 2000 | 650 / 1.100 MHz | 35 W |
Pentium G850 | 2C / 2T | 2,9 / - GHz | 3 MB | HD 2000 | 850 / 1.100 MHz | 65 W |
Pentium G840 | 2C / 2T | 2,8 / - GHz | 3 MB | HD 2000 | 850 / 1.100 MHz | 65 W |
Pentium G620 | 2C / 2T | 2,6 / - GHz | 3 MB | HD 2000 | 850 / 1.100 MHz | 65 W |
Pentium G620T | 2C / 2T | 2,2 / - GHz | 3 MB | HD 2000 | 650 / 1.100 MHz | 35 W |
Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]
Sandy Bridge CPU / GPU / Overclocking
With
Sandy Bridge Intel shows the first major overwork of their Core i7 800 series
CPU architecture. The two CPUs we tested aim at the performance desktop segment
where they can really show what they're capable of. If you compare Sandy Bridge
with Lynnfield you see that the graphics core has now been integrated into the
same piece of silicium like the CPU. To make the graphics core profit as much as
possible Intel equipped Sandy Bridge with a ring architecture. This enables
communication between every single compartment. In plaintext this means that the
graphics core can access data which lies in Level 3 Cache. Furthermore even the
System Agent can control the graphics core to for example change clock speeds.
Furthermore Intel also overworked their TurboBoost technology which now comes in
version 2.0. Now TurboBoost is even more flexible and as we already mentioned it
can also control the GPUs clock speeds.
If one starts
looking for differences between the P67 and P55 Chipset you'll find plenty.
Therefore let us start with the DMI link (Direct Media Interface). With the P67
DMI is a 20 Gb/s interface which allows quick communication between the CPU and
the chipset itself. Compared to the previous generation the DMI link is now ten
times faster. With P67 you also get eight PCI-Express x1 slots instead of six
like with the P55. Also the onboard LAN controller has now been connected to the
chipset via a PCI-Express x1 lan. Very important for owners of high-end SSDs is
that P67 natively comes with up to six SATA3 6Gbps ports.
As we already mentioned with the new core
processors Intel integrated the graphics unit into the same piece of silicium
like the CPU. Therefore all the new Core CPU don't feature a multi chip package
anymore. The differences between HD2000 and HD3000 are mainly between the number
of execution units as well as the clock speeds. HD2000 has got six execution
units whereas HD3000 has been equipped with twelve. Compared to the older
graphics units we find on Lynnfield HD2000 and HD3000 do perform much better.
One reason for this is the Level 3 cache which can be accessed directly. Intel
itself even goes that far that they say that casual gaming should be possible
with HD3000 and HD2000.
Overclocking
It's been a discussion over and
over again at Intel wether they should control overclocking or not. With Sandy
Bridge Intel decided to limit overclocking via the busclock which only leaves
the multiplyer to increase clock speeds. Also the multiplyer can only be changed
if you own a K-Series CPU. With the 2600K for example one is able to increase
the multiplyer all the up to 57 which means that a maximum of 5'700 MHz would be
possible. If we now take into account that on the latest ASUS boards you can
achieve a maximum of 107 busclock you end up with 6'099 MHz. Generally Sandy
Bridge is entirely different in terms of overclocking which is why we're going
to release an article which focuses only on this topic.
Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]
Test setup
Motherboards |
- Intel Socket 1366: ASUS P6T Deluxe
- Intel Socket 1156: P7P55D-E Premium
- Intel Socket 1155: Intel DP67BG
- ASUS Crosshair IV Formula (AMD)
|
CPUs |
- AMD Phenom II X6 1090T, 3.2 GHz
- Intel Core i7 2600K, 3.40 GHz
- Intel Core i5 2500K, 3.30 GHz
- Intel Core i7 980 X, 3.33 GHz
- Intel Core i7 975 XE, 3.33 GHz
- Intel Core i7 965 XE, 3.20 GHz
- Intel Core i7 950, 3.06 GHz
- Intel Core i7 940, 2.93 GHz
- Intel Core i7 920, 2.66 GHz
- Intel Core i7 875, 2.93 GHz
- Intel Core i7 870, 2.93 GHz
- Intel Core i5 750, 2.66 GHz
|
Memory |
- Intel Socket 1155: Kingston HyperX H2O 2133 CL 9-9-9-27, 2 x 2
GByte
- Intel Socket 1366, 1156: Corsair Dominator TR3X3G1600C8D CL
8-8-8-24, 3 x 2 GByte
- AMD: Corsair Dominator TR3X3G1600C8D CL 8-8-8-24, 2 x 2 GByte
|
Graphic
Card |
|
HDD |
- Samsung Spinpoint F1 640 GByte
|
PSU |
- Enermax Revolution 85+ 1050 Watt
|
Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]
3DMark 06
3DMark 06 is getting older these days. Therefore if you are using
really powerful graphic cards you will hit CPU limitation which means that the
graphic card isn't the bottleneck in the system. This is also the reason why in
recent high-end desktop systems 3DMark 06 scales nicely with the CPU and the
graphic card has much less influence on the scores.
Total
3DMark 06 Total |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
20'854 |
136.50 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
20'850 |
136.47 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
20'413 |
133.61 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
20'380 |
133.39 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
18'825 |
123.22 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
18'368 |
120.23 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
17'729 |
116.04 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
17'617 |
115.31 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
17'463 |
114.30 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
17'330 |
113.43 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
16'218 |
106.15 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
16'197 |
106.02 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
15'688 |
102.68 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
15'278 |
100.00 % |
|
more is better |
CPU
3DMark 06 CPU |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
7'466 |
158.35 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
6'715 |
142.42 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
6'710 |
142.31 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
6'053 |
128.38 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
6'007 |
127.40 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
5'908 |
125.30 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
5'539 |
117.48 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
5'529 |
117.26 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
5'329 |
113.02 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
5'166 |
109.57 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
5'118 |
108.54 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
4'715 |
100.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
4'527 |
104.15 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
4'242 |
89.97 % |
|
more is better |
3DMark Vantage
3DMark Vantage is able to squeeze nearly everything out of
a recent system. Therefore the feature liste is also pretty long: DirectX10,
FP16-HDR, motion blur, parallax occlusion mapping, GPU-physics simulation and
different shader effects are being used to even make recent high-end systems
struggle.
Total
3DMark Vantage Total |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHz DDR3-1600 |
14'184 |
109.57 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
13'641 |
105.38 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
13'575 |
104.87 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHz
DDR3-1600 |
13'506 |
104.33 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
13'391 |
103.45 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
13'256 |
102.40 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
13'250 |
102.36 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
13'183 |
101.84 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
12'949 |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHz DDR3-1600 |
12'945 |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
12'933 |
99.91 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
12'715 |
98.22 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
12'035 |
92.97 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
11'444 |
88.40 % |
|
more is better |
CPU
3DMark Vantage CPU |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHz DDR3-1600 |
32'154 |
189.25 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
24'035 |
141.47 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
23'559 |
138.66 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHz
DDR3-1600 |
21'472 |
126.38 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
20'078 |
118.18 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
19'921 |
117.25 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
19'285 |
113.51 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
18'444 |
108.56 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
18'605 |
109.51 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
17'514 |
103.08 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHz DDR3-1600 |
16'990 |
100.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
16'407 |
96.57 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
12'791 |
75.29 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
11'054 |
67.37 % |
|
more is better |
Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]
Cinebench
The test procedure consists of two
main components: The first test sequence is dedicated to the computer's main
processor. A 3D scene file is used to render a photoreaslistic image. The scene
makes use of various CPU-intensive features such as reflection, ambient
occlusion, area lights and procedural shaders. During the first run the
benchmark only uses one CPU (or CPU core) to ascertain a reference value. On
computers that have multiple CPUs or CPU cores and on those that simulate
multiple CPUs (via HyperThreading or similar technolgies), Cinebench will run a
second test using all available CPU power.
1 CPU
Cinebench R10 1 CPU |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
144 sec |
64.57 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
145 sec |
65.02 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
147 sec |
65.92 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
174 sec |
78.03 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
178 sec |
79.82 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
180 sec |
80.72 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
187 sec |
83.86 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
195 sec |
87.44 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
198 sec |
88.79 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
203 sec |
91.03 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
207 sec |
92.83 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
223 sec |
100.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
225 sec |
100.89 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
237 sec |
106.28 % |
|
less is better |
X CPU
Cinebench R10 X CPU |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
31 sec |
56.36 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
37 sec |
67.27 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
37 sec |
67.27 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
43 sec |
78.18 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
43 sec |
78.18 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
47 sec |
85.45 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
48 sec |
87.27 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
48 sec |
87.27 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
50 sec |
90.10 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
52 sec |
94.54 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
52 sec |
94.54 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
55 sec |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
63 sec |
114.55 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
66 sec |
120.00 % |
|
less is better |
Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]
SiSoft Sandra 1
SiSoft
Sandra is a theoretical multi purpose benchmark suite which is able to show
differences in CPU architectures. We split the tests with SiSoft Sandra into two
parts. Therefore on this page you'll find Arithmetic-, Multimedia- and
Cryptography-benchmarks.
Arithmetik
SiSoft Sandra - Arithmetik -
Drystone |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
153.00 GIPS |
240.72 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
118.00 GIPS |
185.65 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
118.00 GIPS |
185.65 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
82.85 GIPS |
130.35 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
82.58 GIPS |
129.92 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
76.77 GIPS |
120.78 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
76.30 GIPS |
120.04 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
73.16 GIPS |
115.10 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
71.68 GIPS |
112.78 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
69.91 GIPS |
109.99 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
68.53 GIPS |
107.81 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
65.56 GIPS |
103.15 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
63.56 GIPS |
100.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
44.71 GIPS |
70.34 % |
|
more is better |
SiSoft Sandra - Arithmetik -
Whetstone |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
130.72 GFLOPS |
234.64 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
83.24 GFLOPS |
149.42 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
83.00 GFLOPS |
148.99 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
71.95 GFLOPS |
129.15 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
66.70 GFLOPS |
119.72 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
64.17 GFLOPS |
116.31 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
61.40 GFLOPS |
110.21 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
61.29 GFLOPS |
110.02 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
59.28 GFLOPS |
106.41 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
55.71 GFLOPS |
100.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
55.55 GFLOPS |
99.71 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
48.74 GFLOPS |
87.49 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
36.88 GFLOPS |
66.20 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
31.97 GFLOPS |
60.98 % |
|
more is better |
Multimedia
SiSoft Sandra - Multimedia -
Integer |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
279.17 MPixel/s |
206.93 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
222.85 MPixel/s |
165.18 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
201.26 MPixel/s |
149.18 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
201.00 MPixel/s |
148.99 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
157.76 MPixel/s |
116.94 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
175.93 MPixel/s |
130.40 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
162.22 MPixel/s |
120.24 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
162.11 MPixel/s |
120.16 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
155.65 MPixel/s |
115.37 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
150.19 MPixel/s |
111.32 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
148.78 MPixel/s |
110.28 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
134.91 MPixel/s |
100.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
149.22 MPixel/s |
90.41 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
116.72 MPixel/s |
86.52 % |
|
more is better |
SiSoft Sandra - Multimedia -
Fliesskomma |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
210.19 MPixel/s |
201.62 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
153.19 MPixel/s |
146.94 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
153.00 MPixel/s |
146.76 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
107.48 MPixel/s |
103.10 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
137.16 MPixel/s |
131.57 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
135.49 MPixel/s |
129.97 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
125.15 MPixel/s |
120.05 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
125.10 MPixel/s |
120.00 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
119.90 MPixel/s |
115.01 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
114.74 MPixel/s |
110.06 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
114.44 MPixel/s |
109.78 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
104.25 MPixel/s |
100.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
91.48 MPixel/s |
87.75 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
90.02 MPixel/s |
86.35 % |
|
more is better |
Crytography
SiSoft Sandra - Crytography - AES
256 |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
11'000 MB/s |
2282.16 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
8'480 MB/s |
1759.34 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
5'990 MB/s |
1161.83 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
5'780 MB/s |
1199.17 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
724 MB/s |
150.21 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
625 MB/s |
129.67 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
579 MB/s |
120.12 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
573 MB/s |
118.88 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
554 MB/s |
114.94 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
530 MB/s |
109.96 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
528 MB/s |
109.54 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
484 MB/s |
100.41 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
482 MB/s |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
456 MB/s |
94.61 % |
|
more is better |
SiSoft Sandra - Crytography - SHA
256 |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
1'032 MB/s |
230.87 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
875 MB/s |
195.75 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
875 MB/s |
195.75 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
887 MB/s |
198.43 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
801 MB/s |
179.19 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
592 MB/s |
132.44 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
581 MB/s |
129.98 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
537 MB/s |
120.13 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
536 MB/s |
119.91 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
522 MB/s |
116.78 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
514 MB/s |
114.99 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
513 MB/s |
114.77 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
492 MB/s |
110.07 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
447 MB/s |
100.00 % |
|
more is better |
Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]
SiSoft Sandra 2
At this point we deliver the values
regarding Memory Bandwidth, Memory Latency as well as Memory and Cache Access.
Memory bandwidth
SiSoft Sandra - Memory bandwidth
- Integer |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
27.28 GB/s |
103.92 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
26.62 GB/s |
101.41 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
26.60 GB/s |
101.33 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
26.54 GB/s |
101.10 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
26.48 GB/s |
100.88 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
26.40 GB/s |
100.57 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
26.25 GB/s |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
19.64 GB/s |
74.82 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
17.63 GB/s |
67.16 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
17.63 GB/s |
67.16 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
14.95 GB/s |
56.95 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
14.51 GB/s |
55.28 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
13.36 GB/s |
50.90 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
13.00 GB/s |
49.52 % |
|
more is better |
SiSoft Sandra - Memory bandwidth
- Floating point[/fr] |
|
[en]Percent |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
27.26 GB/s |
103.93 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
26.58 GB/s |
101.33 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
26.56 GB/s |
101.26 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
26.58 GB/s |
101.33 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
26.49 GB/s |
100.99 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
26.40 GB/s |
100.65 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
26.23 GB/s |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
19.64 GB/s |
74.88 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
17.63 GB/s |
67.21 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
17.62 GB/s |
67.14 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
15.10 GB/s |
57.57 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
14.62 GB/s |
55.74 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
13.36 GB/s |
50.93 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
13.00 GB/s |
49.56 % |
|
more is better |
Memory latency
SiSoft Sandra - Memory latency |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
57 ns |
83.36 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
62 ns |
93.93 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
63 ns |
95.45 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
63 ns |
95.45 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
64 ns |
96.97 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
65 ns |
98.48 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
66 ns |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
68 ns |
103.03 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
72 ns |
109.09 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
73 ns |
115.15 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
80 ns |
121.21 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
81 ns |
122.72 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
82 ns |
124.24 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
82 ns |
124.24 % |
|
less is better |
Memory and cache access
SiSoft Sandra - Memory and cache access |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
114.31 GB/s |
169.57 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
98.67 GB/s |
146.37 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
96.90 GB/s |
143.75 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
94.26 GB/s |
139.83 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
78.06 GB/s |
115.80 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
74.66 GB/s |
110.76 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
72.89 GB/s |
108.13 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
71.05 GB/s |
105.40 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
71.00 GB/s |
105.33 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
67.54 GB/s |
100.19 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
67.41 GB/s |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
57.69 GB/s |
85.58 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
53.94 GB/s |
80.02 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
51.00 GB/s |
75.66 % |
|
more is better |
Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]
Super Pi
Meanwhile Super
Pi even in its latest version has become pretty old. Never the less it is able
to show scaling to the clock speed nicely. fr]Les résultats de SuperPi varient en fonction de la fréquence du processeur et de la mémoire vive ainsi que par ses timings[/fr]
1M
Super Pi 1.5 XS - 1M |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
10.015 sec |
66.25 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
10.381 sec |
68.67 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
10.392 sec |
68.74 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
11.589 sec |
76.66 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
11.700 sec |
77.40 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
11.700 sec |
77.40 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
12.636 sec |
83.59 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
13.177 sec |
87.17 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
13.260 sec |
87.71 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
13.760 sec |
91.02 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
13.975 sec |
92.45 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
15.117 sec |
100.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
19.376 sec |
128.17 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
21.466 sec |
142.00 % |
|
less is better |
32M
Super Pi 1.5 XS - 32M |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
535.985 sec |
67.02 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
559.963 sec |
70.01 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
572.057 sec |
71.53 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
635.233 sec |
79.43 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
635.701 sec |
79.48 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
631.426 sec |
78.95 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
678.429 sec |
84.83 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
683.795 sec |
85.50 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
701.328 sec |
87.69 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
707.463 sec |
88.08 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
734.089 sec |
91.79 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
799.781 sec |
100.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
1173.496 sec |
146.73 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
1294.459 sec |
161.85 % |
|
less is better |
wPrime
wPrime is based on a
multithreaded algorithm to calculate the square root to up to 32 billion digits.
Therefore it is possible to put 100 percent load on every core or thread and to
see differences between architectures.
32M
wPrime - 32M |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
32.544 sec |
70.55 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
33.522 sec |
72.67 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
33.885 sec |
73.46 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
35.132 sec |
76.16 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHz DDR3-1600 |
35.338 sec |
76.61 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
35.406 sec |
76.75 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
36.786 sec |
79.74 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
38.297 sec |
83.02 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
39.243 sec |
85.07 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
39.965 sec |
86.64 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
40.395 sec |
87.07 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
41.901 sec |
90.85 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
45.771 sec |
99.22 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
46.130 sec |
100.00 % |
|
less is better |
Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]
WinRAR
WinRAR is a well known archivier. It is highly efficient and
it also comes with an integrated benchmark routine. We also do a real world
application be archiving a folder which exists on the hard drive.
Integer Test
WinRAR - Interger Test |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
4'108 KB/sec |
116.74 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
3'998 KB/sec |
113.61 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
3'929 KB/sec |
111.65 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
3'849 KB/sec |
109.38 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
3'738 KB/sec |
106.22 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
3'694 KB/sec |
104.97 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
3'519 KB/sec |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
3'489 KB/sec |
99.15 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
3'465 KB/sec |
98.47 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
3'251 KB/sec |
92.38 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
3'169 KB/sec |
90.05 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
2'905 KB/sec |
82.55 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
2'395 KB/sec |
68.06 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
2'395 KB/sec |
68.06 % |
|
more is better |
Folder compression
WinRAR - Folder compression (669
Files / 32 Folders / 694 MB) |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
88 sec |
59.86 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
104 sec |
70.75 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
116 sec |
78.91 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
122 sec |
82.99 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
130 sec |
88.43 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
135 sec |
91.83 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
138 sec |
93.88 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
141 sec |
95.91 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
147 sec |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
174 sec |
118.37 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
175 sec |
119.05 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
181 sec |
123.13 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
190 sec |
129.25 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
215 sec |
146.63 % |
|
less is better |
Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]
Crysis DirectX10
Crysis is still one of the games which has very high
system requirements. Therefore developer Crytek implemented Direct3D-10-API,
High-Dynamic-Range-Rendering, Parallax Occlusion Mapping, Soft Shadows, Motion
Blur, Depth of Field as well as Soft Particles. We test Crysis by using DirectX10 to show CPU-sacaling especially which low resolutions. If
we look at the high resolutions we are able to spot that the CPUs influence
compared to the graphic card becomes much less important.
Crysis DirectX10
800 x 600, low details
Crysis DirectX10 (800 x 600 low
details) |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
156.42 fps |
124.64 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
153.58 fps |
122.37 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
146.41 fps |
116.66 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
142.24 fps |
113.34 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
136.38 fps |
108.67 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
139.91 fps |
111.48 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
135.65 fps |
108.09 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
132.60 fps |
105.66 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
125.50 fps |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
122.66 fps |
97.74 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
109.52 fps |
87.67 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
107.91 fps |
85.98 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
90.35 fps |
71.99 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
89.77 fps |
71.53 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333
(Intel Graphics HD3000) |
45.31 fps |
36.10 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333
(Intel Graphics HD3000) |
44.10 fps |
35.14 % |
|
more is better |
1920 x 1080, very high details, 16x AA
Crysis DirectX10 (1920 x 1080 high
details, 16x AA) |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
24.65 fps |
125.57 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
19.99 fps |
101.83 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
19.93 fps |
101.53 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
19.92 fps |
101.48 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
19.79 fps |
100.79 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
19.74 fps |
100.58 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
19.72 fps |
100.48 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
19.69 fps |
100.26 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
19.63 fps |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
19.55 fps |
99.59 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
19.35 fps |
98.57 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
19.32 fps |
98.42 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
17.15 fps |
87.37 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
17.03 fps |
86.75 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333
(Intel Graphics HD3000) |
3.78 fps |
19.26 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333
(Intel Graphics HD3000) |
2.02 fps |
10.29 % |
|
more is better |
Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]
PT Boats Knights of Seas DirectX10
PT
Boats Knights of Seas is based on the Direct-3D-10 API, supports multicore CPUs
and comes with a physics engine. Also at this point we see a good scaling of the
CPU at low resolutions and nearly no influence when applying high resolutions.
1024 x 768, low details
PT Boats Knights of Seas DirectX10
(1024 x 768 low details) |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
109.7 fps |
146.46 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
99.5 fps |
132.84 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
98.1 fps |
130.97 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
96.9 fps |
129.37 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
91.6 fps |
123.45 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
88.4 fps |
118.02 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
84.5 fps |
112.82 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
82.0 fps |
109.48 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
75.1 fps |
100.27 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
74.9 fps |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
74.8 fps |
99.87 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
74.2 fps |
99.07 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
68.5 fps |
91.15 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
67.0 fps |
89.45 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333
(Intel Graphics HD3000) |
36.3 fps |
48.46 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333
(Intel Graphics HD3000) |
34.1 fps |
45.53 % |
|
more is better |
1920 x 1080, high details, 8x AA
PT Boats Knights of Seas DirectX10
(1920 x 1080 high details, 8x AA) |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
36.0 fps |
107.46 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
35.9 fps |
107.16 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
36.1 fps |
107.76 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
34.9 fps |
104.18 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
34.1 fps |
101.79 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
33.9 fps |
101.19 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
33.7 fps |
100.60 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
33.7 fps |
100.60 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
33.6 fps |
100.30 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
33.6 fps |
100.30 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
33.5 fps |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
33.5 fps |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
30.9 fps |
92.23 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
30.7 fps |
91.64 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333
(Intel Graphics HD3000) |
6.0 fps |
17.91 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333
(Intel Graphics HD3000) |
5.1 fps |
15.22 % |
|
more is better |
Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]
Resident Evil 5 DirectX10
Resident Evil uses nearly every modern rendering technology: HDR,
Hemisphere Lighting, Soft Shadows, Soft Particles, Field- und Motion-Blur oder
auch Alpha to Coverage and static Ambient Occlusion. Furthermore Resident Evil 5
has been optimized for multicore architectures and already comes DirectX11
ready. By using the DirectX10 benchmark we can again
show you CPU-scaling with low resolutions and the compared to the CPU
overproportional influence of the graphics card at high resolutions.
Resident Evil DirectX10
800 x 600, low details
Resident Evil DirectX10 (800 x 600
low details) |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
199.9 fps |
136.92 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
195.0 fps |
135.56 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
185.0 fps |
126.71 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
171.2 fps |
117.26 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
170.0 fps |
116.44 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
163.0 fps |
111.64 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
160.2 fps |
109.73 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
160.2 fps |
109.73 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
154.9 fps |
106.10 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
146.0 fps |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
126.7 fps |
86.78 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
126.1 fps |
86.67 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
110.7 fps |
75.82 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
110.6 fps |
75.75 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333
(Intel Graphics HD3000) |
57.5 fps |
39.38 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333
(Intel Graphics HD3000) |
56.0 fps |
38.36 % |
|
more is better |
1920 x 1080, high details, 8x AA
Resident Evil DirectX10 (1920 x
1080 high details, 8x AA) |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
76.4 fps |
103.52 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
76.0 fps |
102.98 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
75.9 fps |
102.85 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
74.8 fps |
101.36 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
74.3 fps |
100.68 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
74.3 fps |
100.68 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
74.2 fps |
100.54 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
74.1 fps |
100.41 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
74.0 fps |
100.27 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
73.8 fps |
100.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
72.9 fps |
98.78 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
72.1 fps |
81.16 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
60.1 fps |
81.44 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
59.2 fps |
80.22 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333
(Intel Graphics HD3000) |
10.8 fps |
14.63 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333
(Intel Graphics HD3000) |
9.7 fps |
13.14 % |
|
more is better |
Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]
Street Fighter4
Street Fighter 4 comes
with an extra benchmark version which makes testing you system childrens play.
At low resolutions the system requirements are pretty low and we can see
CPU-scaling in the results. At high resolution the graphic card becomes more
important and the CPUs clock speed has less influence on the fps.
800 x 600, low details
Street Fighter 4 (800 x 600 low
details) |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
520.13 fps |
137.27 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
497.45 fps |
131.28 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
486.46 fps |
128.38 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
460.91 fps |
121.64 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
444.66 fps |
117.35 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
441.01 fps |
116.39 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
432.45 fps |
114.13 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
425.52 fps |
112.30 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
397.63 fps |
104.94 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
385.73 fps |
101.80 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
378.91 fps |
100.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
345.83 fps |
91.27 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
312.10 fps |
82.37 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
230.69 fps |
60.88 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333
(Intel Graphics HD3000) |
119.68 fps |
31.59 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333
(Intel Graphics HD3000) |
95.83 fps |
25.29 % |
|
more is better |
1920 x 1080, high details, 8x AA, 16x AF
Street Fighter 4 (1920 x 1080 high
details, 8x AA, 16x AF) |
|
Percent |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
98.06 fps |
122.51 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
88.25 fps |
110.26 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
87.93 fps |
109.86 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
90.76 fps |
113.39 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
87.18 fps |
108.92 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
87.10 fps |
108.82 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
85.58 fps |
106.92 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
82.51 fps |
103.08 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
80.46 fps |
100.52 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
80.27 fps |
100.29 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
80.17 fps |
100.16 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
80.12 fps |
100.10 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
80.04 fps |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
61.23 fps |
76.50 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333
(Intel Graphics HD3000) |
10.24 fps |
12.79 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333
(Intel Graphics HD3000) |
7.46 fps |
9.32 % |
|
more is better |
Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]
Power Consumption
Hereby we take the
power consumption under load as well as idle. To generate a load situation we
use SiSoft Sandra's Burn-In Module and measure the whole systems power
consumption. The values we take when the System just booted into Windows and the
load drops.
Idle |
Consumption |
Percent |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333
(Intel Graphics HD3000) |
45 Watt |
34.62 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333
(Intel Graphics HD3000) |
47 Watt |
36.15 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
73 Watt |
56.15 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
74 Watt |
56.92 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
76 Watt |
58.46 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
81 Watt |
62.31 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
85 Watt |
65.38 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
86 Watt |
66.15 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
91 Watt |
70.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
106 Watt |
81.54 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
126 Watt |
96.92 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
130 Watt |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
132 Watt |
101.53 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
134 Watt |
103.08 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
136 Watt |
104.62 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
140 Watt |
107.69 % |
|
less is better |
Load |
Consumption |
Percent |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333
(Intel Graphics HD3000) |
119 Watt |
59.20 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333
(Intel Graphics HD3000) |
133 Watt |
66.17 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333 |
135 Watt |
67.16 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
150 Watt |
74.63 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333 |
146 Watt |
72.64 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133 |
154 Watt |
76.62 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
155 Watt |
77.11 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
179 Watt |
89.05 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
196 Watt |
97.51 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
198 Watt |
98.51 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
201 Watt |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
206 Watt |
102.49 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
211 Watt |
104.98 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
216 Watt |
107.46 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
220 Watt |
109.45 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
248 Watt |
123.38 % |
|
less is better |
Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]
Conclusion
With Sandy Bridge Intel not only shows new CPUs
they also introduce their new socket 1155. Furthermore Intel also seems to have
overworked the memory controller. With the Core i7 2600K is was possible to run
our Kingston memory at 2'133 MHz absolutely stable. As a consequence the system
performed better by quite a margin. Generally Intel did a lot regarding
efficiency which results in more performance per MHz. Also TurboBoost has been
overworked. But this time it was Intels intention to make this feature more
flexible that it for example also supports the integrated graphics core.
The new Core i7 2600K as well as the Core i5 2500K almost
dominate the quad core CPUs we've tested so far. Therefore the Core i7 2600K can
even outperform a Core i7 975XE. Of course looking at memory bandwidth the P67
platform with 1'333 MHz DDR3 memory is slower than the triple channel X58. But
on the other hand if you own memory which allow you to set 2'133 MHz Sandy
Bridge can even outperform a triple Channel interface. If you're looking for
some further evidence that Sandy Bridges performance per MHz has been increased
you can look at the SuperPi results. There you can clearly see that Core i7
2600K as well as Core i5 2500K are in another league.
Especially astonishing is the fact that Core i7 2600K as well as
Core i5 2500K both are mid range CPUs. Intel recommended USD 317 for the Core i7
2600K and USD 216 for the Core i5 2500K which makes both of these CPUs
exceptionally good value for money.
Intels
Core i7 2600K as well as Core i5 2500K definitely are upgrades compared to their
Lynnfield predecessors. If you should already own memory which can achieve very
high clock speeds you'll do everything right in buying a P67 platform. Generally
we can recommend Sandy Bridge CPUs equally for HTPCs as well as gaming systems
one can even find a Sandy Bridge based CPU which suites an office PCs needs.
Therefore the high end market has been the only segment which has not been
upgraded with the release of these CPUs. High end can still rely on the Core i7
980X six core CPU.
Author : Marc Büchel,
m.buechel@ocaholic.ch
Discuss this article in the forum [pagebreak]